Clifton Terrace Model School

Education institution number:
2826
School type:
Full Primary
School gender:
Co-Educational
Definition:
Model School
Total roll:
63
Telephone:
Address:

15 Clifton Terrace, Kelburn, Wellington

View on map

Clifton Terrace Model School - 06/05/2019

School Context

Clifton Terrace Model School in central Wellington caters for students in Years 1 to 8. The current roll of 68 students includes three who identify as Māori and nine as Pacific. Four students are English language learners.

Decision-making at the school is underpinned by core values, which emphasise learning and discovery; relationships, cultures and inclusivity; and self-confidence and leadership. These values are used to promote the school mission: ‘to inspire in each pupil a thirst for leaning, drawing on the rich opportunities available to a small inner-city school.’

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, schoolwide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • student achievement in reading, writing and mathematics
  • attendance.

The school is led by a teaching principal. It is part of the Enviroschools’ network and has earned their gold award, as well as a gold SchoolGen award for sustainable practices. Recent professional development has been focused on digital fluency, cultural competencies and raising achievement in literacy.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

Achievement data from 2018 shows that most students achieved at and above curriculum expectations in reading and writing. The large majority achieved similar levels in mathematics. The number of children achieving well in reading has increased since 2016. Māori and Pacific students achieve at the same levels as their peers.

In writing and mathematics there has been disparity over time for boys when compared to girls. In writing, boys’ achievement has increased 2017 and 2018.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

The school is accelerating achievement for many students at risk of not achieving.

In 2018, half of target students made accelerated progress in reading, two-thirds in writing and one-quarter in mathematics.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Students benefit from a rich and engaging curriculum that is strongly grounded in arts, languages and the local community. Regular outings into the surrounding community and wider city give meaningful contexts to learning. Environmental sustainability experiences are maximised as opportunities to promote students’ critical and innovative thinking.

Successfully fostering learner agency and leadership is a key strength of the school. Students are innovative, competent and focused learners. Self-management is well promoted. Learners are well equipped to challenge themselves with meaningful inquiries and use a wide range of digital tools to enhance learning.

A strong sense of community is purposefully maintained by teachers, leaders and trustees. They value families’ expertise and ensure their active contribution to decision-making and curriculum design. Children’s home contexts and diverse cultures, languages and identities are well known by staff. These are celebrated and meaningfully integrated into teaching and learning. Māori students are well supported through culturally responsive partnerships between their whānau and the school.

Te reo me ngā tikanga Māori are highly valued, and embedded in school practices. Students are well supported to understand and value Te Tiriti o Waitangi through meaningful, authentic experiences. Specialists in te reo and kapa haka further promote teachers’ and students’ learning in this area.

Teachers know their learners very well, and make good use of assessment to inform students’ next steps. Highly collaborative practices support the tracking and targeting of students at risk of not achieving. Where specialist support is appropriate, the school works effectively alongside external agencies, parents and students to implement specific strategies.

Internal evaluation promotes continual improvement across school practices and processes. A good range of evidence, including student and parent voice, is gathered to effectively guide decision making. The impact of new initiatives is monitored through useful evaluative practices.

Teacher appraisal is improvement focused, and effectively promotes collective responsibility for schoolwide plans. Systematic teacher inquiry processes and professional learning opportunities are aligned to the school vision, values, goals and targets.

Leadership has successfully built relational trust and effective collaboration at every level of the school, as well as with the wider community and education sector. Cohesive systems, shared understandings and a clear focus on students are in place to support ongoing improvements and learner success.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Leaders have identified, and ERO agrees, that continuing to address disparity of outcomes for boys in writing and mathematics is an ongoing priority. ERO affirms school plans to continue engaging in relevant professional learning to refine teacher practice, alongside use of well-established targeting and monitoring systems, to enhance positive outcomes.

3 Board Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration and certification
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

4 ERO’s Overall Judgement

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO’s overall evaluation judgement of Clifton Terrace Model School’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Strong.

ERO’s Framework: Overall School Performance is available on ERO’s website.

5 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • a rich, highly localised curriculum that promotes student leadership and engagement
  • culturally responsive and effective teaching practice that responds to individual learners
  • improvement-focused internal evaluation and inquiry processes
  • stewardship and leadership that foster collaboration and community learning partnerships.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, a priority for further development is in:

  • continuing to address disparity of outcomes for boys in writing and mathematics.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review and Improvement Services Southern

Southern Region

6 May 2019

About the school

Location

Wellington

Ministry of Education profile number

2826

School type

Full primary (Years 1 to 8)

School roll

68

Gender composition

Girls 34, Boys 34

Ethnic composition

Māori 3

NZ European/Pākehā 38

Asian 14

Pacific 9

Other ethnic groups 4

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

No

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

March 2019

Date of this report

6 May 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review April 2015

Education Review May 2011

Clifton Terrace Model School - 02/04/2015

Findings

The school has high quality systems and processes that support students’ learning. The co-principals' approach to ongoing improvement is highly evident. Students enjoy learning in an inclusive environment where individual needs are recognised and effectively responded to. The holistic curriculum is well developed. Staff and students work collaboratively.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in four-to-five years.

1 Context

What are the important features of this school that have an impact on student learning?

Clifton Terrace Model School is a small, full primary in central Wellington. Of the 67 students, four identify as Māori and ten as Pacific. All students learn Spanish and the school is a sister school with one in Mexico. As a model school, a close relationship is maintained with teacher training programmes at Victoria University of Wellington.

The school operates a shared management system with two co-principals. New teaching staff have commenced in 2015. The school continues with its holistic focus that considers the whole child and includes science, the arts, culture and place. Students have an inclusive learning environment.

In November 2014, a new board of trustees was elected. An external facilitator is assisting with board training in 2015.

Environmental education continues to be a focal point. A key area of professional development in 2013 and 2014 was e-learning and use of digital technology. During this time the school infrastructure was developed and staff skills increased.

2 Learning

How well does this school use achievement information to make positive changes to learners’ engagement, progress and achievement?

Achievement information is used well to identify students’ learning needs, to plan appropriately to address underachievement and to extend those who are able. The need to accelerate students at risk of not achieving is addressed through individualised programmes and the school’s participation in Accelerated Literacy programmes.

National Standards data are reported to the board. End-of-year 2014 student achievement information showed that most students achieved at and above in relation to National Standards in reading and mathematics. The percentage is lower for writing and this is an area of focus for 2015. Data showed Māori and Pacific students achieved well. Parents are well informed about their children’s progress through parent-teacher discussions, written reports and regular communication.

Teachers have continued to develop their moderation processes since the May 2011 ERO report, to ensure that teachers’ overall judgements in relation to the National Standards are reliable. School leaders are working with other schools, in 2015, to moderate these judgements across a wider group of teachers and students.

Students' diverse learning needs are well catered for. Strategies used by staff include intensive support through explicit classroom teaching, specific programmes and specialist assistance where appropriate. Responses to students' special needs are closely monitored.

Learning conversations between students and with teachers are evident at all year levels. Students are enthusiastic about their learning. They understand and talk confidently about the purpose. A strategic goal for 2015 is to further develop students’ understanding of how they learn. ERO’s evaluation supports the direction to increase student ownership of their progress and achievement.

The co-principals make good use of school achievement data to set annual targets. Making these targets more specific is likely to put emphasis on teachers accelerating the progress of underachieving students. Such specificity should also strengthen monitoring and evaluating progress against the targets.

3 Curriculum

How effectively does this school’s curriculum promote and support student learning?

The broad curriculum promotes and supports student learning. A carefully considered approach has been taken to review of curriculum. High quality implementation plans clearly outline shared expectations for teaching and learning. The curriculum embodies the school’s core values. A strong focus on students and teachers working collaboratively is evident.

Students experience a wide variety of authentic learning experiences. Community members regularly visit the school and share their expertise. Students make good use of city facilities, including the library and art galleries.

Student use of inquiry is evident and well embedded. Students talk confidently and proudly about their inquiry work. They enjoy opportunities to research topics of relevance to them.

The place of digital technologies in learning is emphasised. Learning within literacy and mathematics programmes is effectively supported by students' use of these tools.

Students have a range of leadership opportunities. Responsibility is encouraged, especially amongst senior students, to empower them and develop confidence for their next stages of education.

The curriculum includes a well-considered bicultural emphasis. The co-principals expect that students respect and value each other’s cultures and make connections between Māori culture and their own. Manaakitanga is valued.

Transition processes into school, and learning pathways and transition to secondary school, are effective.

How effectively does the school promote educational success for Māori, as Māori?

Expectations that staff ensure school cultural practices acknowledge Māori principles, perspectives and practices are clearly stated. Emphasis on promoting Māori students' success as Māori through culture, language and identity is well documented. Tuakana teina relationships are evident in students' interactions and shared learning.

Tikanga is integral part of school hui. School agreements (framed by students and staff) reinforce shared understandings and expectations for promoting Māori students' educational success, as Māori. Ako is evident.

4 Sustainable Performance

How well placed is the school to sustain and improve its performance?

The school is very well placed to sustain and improve its performance. Shared leadership is well established and continues to work effectively. The co-principals work collaboratively in a deliberate and strategic manner to promote improved outcomes for students.

Professional development is well considered and identified areas for further development are evidence-based.

Teachers’ inquiry into their practice is undertaken in a considered manner and linked to appraisal. Teachers actively share the process and outcomes of their inquiries with each other.

Trustees recognise the importance of professional development to build shared understanding of their governance roles. Trustees have engaged an external facilitator to ensure that high quality processes are maintained.

Self review continues to be highly effective. Strong communication systems are in place as these are recognised as central to improved and sustained school performance. The strategic and annual plans are well aligned to the school charter and improvement focused.

A high level of parent engagement is evident and building partnerships for learning continues to be a priority.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance.

Conclusion

The school has high quality systems and processes that support students’ learning. The co-principals' approach to ongoing improvement is highly evident. Students enjoy learning in an inclusive environment where individual needs are recognised and effectively responded to. The holistic curriculum is well developed. Staff and students work collaboratively.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in four-to-five years.

Joyce Gebbie

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central

2 April 2015

About the School

Location

Wellington

Ministry of Education profile number

2826

School type

Full Primary (Years 1 to 8)

School roll

67

Gender composition

Females 36, Males 31

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Pacific

Other European

Indian

Latin American

4

41

10

5

4

3

Review team on site

February 2015

Date of this report

2 April 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

Education Review

Education Review

May 2011

June 2007

June 2004