Good Seeds Childrens Centre

Education institution number:
25054
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
55
Telephone:
Address:

201 Buckland Road, Mangere, Auckland

View on map

Good Seeds Childrens Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Good Seeds Childrens Centre is one of three centres operated by the Good Seeds Trust group. Governance is provided by an operations manager and the CEO of the Trust. There have been significant staffing changes since ERO’s previous report in 2021. The community is ethnically diverse. Most of the children attending are Māori or of Pacific heritage. 

Summary of Review Findings

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to nurture reciprocal relationships. They provide a language rich environment that supports children’s learning. 

The service curriculum is inclusive and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. Children’s preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning. A range of experiences and opportunities are provided to children to enhance and extend their learning and development. 

Consistent implementation of systems and practices is required to ensure that regulatory standards are maintained.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Having and implementing a procedure for the changing of nappies that ensures safe and hygienic practices (HS3).
  • Carrying out all relevant emergency drills on an, at least, three monthly basis and keeping a record of these (HS8).
  • Keeping a medication record which includes the required written authority from parents (HS28).
  • Having evidence of parental permission and approval of adult: child ratios for excursions in the van before the excursion takes place (HS17).
  • Keeping a record of all injuries, illnesses and incidents that occur at the service, which includes evidence that parents have been informed (HS27).
  • Ensuring that before a person is employed or engages as a children’s worker, a complete safety check is undertaken which includes a risk assessment and valid policy check (GMA7A).
  • Having an annual plan which includes who is responsible for completion of the key tasks the service intends to undertake. (GMA8).

Next ERO Review 

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation. 

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

22 November 2023 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameGood Seeds Childrens Centre
Profile Number25054
LocationMangere, Auckland
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for80 children, including up to 10 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 80-99%
Service roll83
Review team on siteSeptember 2023
Date of this report22 November 2023
Most recent ERO report(s)Akanuku | Assurance Review, November 2021; Education Review, May 2018

General Information about Assurance Reviews 

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate. 

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice. 

Good Seeds Childrens Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesNot meeting
Health and safetyNot meeting
Governance, management and administrationNot meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified areas of non-compliance with regulatory standards that are an unacceptable risk to children.

Background

Good Seeds Childrens Centre is one of the three services owned by a not-for-profit organisation, Good Seed Trust. An area manager provides support to the centre leader, three qualified kaiako and eight unqualified staff, including family engagement support workers. A third of the children are Māori. Most of the children attending have Pacific heritage.

Summary of Review Findings

Children are provided with opportunities to develop knowledge and an understanding of Te Tiriti o Waitangi. The service curriculum respects and supports the right of each child to be confident in their own culture and encourages children to understand and respect other cultures.

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. A range of experiences and opportunities to extend learning and development is provided for children.

Consistent implementation and review of the service’s policies and practices is required to ensure compliance with licensing requirements. An increased level of monitoring of health and safety practices is required.

Actions for Compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • having a space where a sick child can be temporarily kept at a safe distance from other children (to prevent cross infection), lie down comfortably and be supervised
  • documenting how evaluation of emergency drills has informed the annual review of the service’s emergency plan
  • ensuring all children’s workers who have access to children are safety checked in accordance with the Children’s Act 2014.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, PF27, HS8, GMA7A.

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Ensuring that bedding intended for children to sleep on is covered with non-porous material that protects the child from becoming soiled and allows for easy cleaning (PF30).
  • Providing clean, individual bedding for sleeping or resting children (PF31).
  • Having a current fire evacuation scheme approved by Fire and Emergency New Zealand (HS4).
  • Securing heavy equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage (HS6).
  • Having evidence of review of the emergency management plan on at least an annual basis and implementation of improved practices as required (HS7).
  • Recording the analysis of accident and incident records to identify hazards and to take appropriate action (HS12).
  • Ensuring that when children leave the premises on an excursion, evidence of parental approval of adult:child ratios and the signature of the person responsible giving approval for the excursion to take place is documented (HS17).

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends that the Ministry reassess the licence issued to this service provider. ERO will not undertake a further review of this service until the Ministry of Education is satisfied that the service meets regulatory standards.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Phil Cowie
Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

24 November 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameGood Seeds Childrens Centre
Profile Number25054
LocationMangere, Auckland
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for80 children, including up to 10 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers80-99%
Service roll82
Ethnic compositionMāori 21, NZ European/Pākehā 1, Cook Island Māori 17, Samoan 13, Niuean 12, Tongan 10, Asian 5, other ethnic groups 3
Review team on siteJuly 2021
Date of this report24 November 2021
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, May 2018; Education Review, October 2014

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Good Seeds Childrens Centre - 04/05/2018

1 Evaluation of Good Seeds Childrens Centre

How well placed is Good Seeds Childrens Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Good Seeds Childrens Centre is located in Mangere, Auckland, in the grounds of the Shiloh Church. It is licensed for 80 children, including 10 aged up to two years. Families attending the centre come from diverse cultures, with the majority being of Māori or Pacific heritage. The centre is one of two operating under the Good Seed Trust.

The Good Seed Trust, which is an independent non-profit making organisation provides a framework of operational policies and procedures to support the day-to-day management of the Mangere and Mt Wellington centres. They have a strong commitment 'to equip families to live abundant lives, ensuring success and positive learning outcomes for all'. A significant feature of the centre is the Family Support team who work closely with staff and families.

The recently reviewed centre philosophy includes Christian values and recognises core principles of aroha, manaakitanga and whanaungatanga. It supports an environment that enables children to become C.U.T.E (confident, unique and thriving with enquiring minds). The vision statement 'strengthening families, transforming communities' underpins centre operations.

ERO's 2014 report noted the respectful, positive and cooperative relationships in the centre that are still very evident. ERO also identified areas for development, including internal evaluation, clarifying leadership roles and responsibilities, and support for beginning teachers. Centre leaders have made some progress in addressing these next steps.

The Review Findings

Children, parents and whānau are warmly welcomed into the centre. Teachers know their centre community well and provide parents with opportunities to share their aspirations for their children. They recognise Māori as tangata whenua and are responsive to families' diverse cultures.

Children are happy and settled in the centre environment and choose from a variety of activities inside and in the outdoors. Children are keen to learn. They participate in sustained, collaborative and individual play in a well-resourced environment.

Teachers are sensitive to the needs of babies and toddlers, who experience caring and nurturing practices. Responsive adult interactions support children to be confident in their surroundings. It is timely to review the learning environment to better support positive outcomes for infants and toddlers. Teachers should improve children's access to learning resources, including those that reflect Māori and Pacific cultures.

Teaching practices are affirming, nurturing and supportive of all children. Teachers discuss children's learning and plan collaboratively for individual and group interests. Teaching practices are inclusive, and a strong emphasis is placed on children's and whānau wellbeing. Continuing to build teachers' capability to extend children's language and thinking is a priority for centre leaders. Aligning the programme planning with the centre philosophy and continuing to review the use of digital devices as a teaching tool are also next development steps.

Leaders and teachers carefully consider transitions into and beyond the centre. Four vans are provided by the service to collect children who require transportation. Teachers have developed strong relationships with local schools. They work alongside parents to support a smooth transition for each child.

Leaders strongly promote the services' vision and associated goals. They support individual and whole-centre professional development, including engaging the Family Support team where relevant. Teacher appraisal processes align with the future direction of the service. The appraisal system needs to be aligned with Education Council requirements and applied to all teachers.

The centre is well governed and managed. Management systems are understood by staff. The Trust and centre strategic plans are documented and would be strengthened by the regular evaluation of progress, linked to outcomes for children. Leaders could also consider reviewing Trust and management roles in order to build leadership capacity across the senior management structure.

Key Next Steps

Key next steps agreed to by the Trust and centre leaders include:

  • strengthening learning partnerships with parents to further inform programme planning
  • continuing to develop internal evaluation across all aspects of centre operations to improve outcomes for children
  • building centre-wide leadership capacity and strengthening teaching practices to extend and challenge children's thinking.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Good Seeds Childrens Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Good Seeds Childrens Centre will be in three years.

Julie Foley

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

4 May 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationMangere, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number25054
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for80 children, including up to 10 aged under 2
Service roll110
Gender compositionGirls 55% Boys 45%
Ethnic compositionMāori 
Samoan
Tongan 
Cook Islands Māori
Niuean 
other
28% 
26%
18%
14%
10%
4%

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:3Better than minimum requirements
Over 21:9Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteMarch 2018
Date of this report4 May 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewOctober 2014
Education ReviewSeptember 2011
Education ReviewAugust 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.