Haywood Cottage Montessori

Education institution number:
46521
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
32
Telephone:
Address:

42 Huffey Street, Geraldine

View on map

Haywood Cottage Montessori

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama- indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most (PDF 3.01MB) are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. The Akarangi Quality Evaluation Judgement Rubric (PDF 91.30KB) derived from the indicators, is used to inform the ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Haywood Cottage Montessori are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

ERO’s judgement

What the service knows about outcomes for learners

Whāngai Establishing

Ngā Akatoro Domains

ERO’s judgement

He Whāriki Motuhake

The learner and their learning

Whakaū Embedding

Whakangungu Ngaio

Collaborative professional learning builds knowledge and capability

Whāngai Establishing

Ngā Aronga Whai Hua

Evaluation for improvement

Whāngai Establishing

Kaihautū

Leaders foster collaboration and improvement

Whāngai Establishing

Te Whakaruruhau

Stewardship through effective governance and management

Whāngai Establishing

2 Context of the Service

Haywood Cottage Montessori is a rural centre providing education and care for children from two-years old to school age. The owner manages the service and leads a team of qualified teachers to develop and implement the curriculum. Montessori philosophy underpins teaching and learning.

3 Summary of findings

Children are supported to grow into capable and competent learners, experiencing a curriculum based on Montessori philosophy and the principles and strands of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. They are encouraged to contribute by taking responsibility for everyday tasks. Their wellbeing is nurtured through daily rituals. Integrated learning experiences encourage physical, emotional, and social wellbeing.

The daily programme provides opportunities for children to choose between teacher presentations, real work moments and spontaneous play. Children direct their own learning and have free access to intentionally designed indoor and outdoor environments. Ongoing group inquiries support them to take ownership of their learning and build their capabilities.

Leadership and teachers are building their capability to provide a culturally responsive curriculum for all children. Te reo Māori and aspects of te ao Māori, such as waiata and pakiwaitara (te ao Māori legends) are beginning to be integrated into the curriculum. Te reo me tikanga Māori have yet to be deeply embedded. Some te ao Māori values such as whanaungatanga (relationships) and manaakitanga (care and reciprocity) are highly valued and woven into daily practices. These encourage children to care for each other and work together.

Each child’s learning and progress is recorded and shared with them and their families. Children highly value their profile books and regularly read and revisit these learning records. This strengthens their identity as learners. Assessment, planning, and evaluation practices are not yet consistent amongst all teachers to determine how well children are progressing in terms of the learning outcomes in Te Whāriki. 

Strong curriculum leadership based on extensive knowledge about the Montessori philosophy and principles, provides a clear vision and expectations of the approach to the new teaching team. Appropriate tools and methods are beginning to be used for evaluation to support improvement. However, internal evaluation does not yet sufficiently focus on promoting ongoing improvement for learners. 

4 Improvement actions

Haywood Cottage Montessori will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning. These are to:

  • strengthen the integration of te reo me tikanga Māori into the curriculum to support children to develop an understanding and appreciation of New Zealand’s bi-cultural heritage

  • support teachers understanding in the use of Te Whāriki learning outcomes and how these can be used to determine how well children are learning and progressing over time

  • build the collective capability of the teaching team to use internal evaluation, including gathering a wider range of evidence to inform evaluative reasoning and returning to the quality indicators to judge the effectiveness of their practice on outcomes for children.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Haywood Cottage Montessori completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management, and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

8 April 2022 

6 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Haywood Cottage Montessori

Profile Number

46521

Location

Geraldine

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 0 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

26

Ethnic composition

Māori 1, NZ European/Pākehā 21, Other ethnic groups 4

Review team on site

October 2021

Date of this report

8 April 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, November 2017.

 

Haywood Cottage Montessori - 16/11/2017

1 Evaluation of Haywood Cottage Montessori

How well placed is Haywood Cottage Montessori to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Haywood Cottage Montessori is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Haywood Cottage Montessori is a small, rural centre providing education and care for children from two-years old to school age. The centre opened in August 2014. This is its first education review.

The two teachers are qualified and certified early childhood teachers. The owner works as the head teacher of the centre and has a Montessori qualification. She is strongly committed to the Montessori philosophy and recognises the importance of incorporating Te Whāriki, Early Childhood Curriculum into the daily programme.

The centre is part of Te Awa Whiri Kāhui Ako I Community of Learning (CoL).

The Review Findings

Children are actively involved in a calm, unhurried environment where teachers give them time to make decisions and learn from watching their peers. They experience respectful, caring relationships with each other and their teachers. Children confidently choose from a wide range of activities in the thoughtfully prepared, very well resourced indoor and outside areas.

Children have many leadership opportunities. They are familiar with the daily routines and centre rituals. Children clearly show they understand the expectations. Teachers sensitively foster children's growing confidence as learners and purposefully develop their independence skills to build each child's sense of belonging and wellbeing.

Teachers engage in thoughtful, shared interactions with children. They use a range of intentional strategies that include purposeful discussions and questioning to guide children’s learning. Mathematics and the creative arts are intentional aspects of the learning programme. Teachers are increasingly integrating te reo and tikanga Māori into the daily learning programme. 

The centre is welcoming and inclusive of families. Transition into the centre is carefully managed to meet the needs of the child and family. The head teacher has a positive relationship with the local school. Children and families experience a well-managed, thoughtful transition process that supports their successful entry into school.

Parents have many opportunities to discuss their children’s learning and wellbeing with teachers. They are actively involved in the centre and encouraged to contribute their skills and knowledge to support children's learning and sense of belonging.

The owner has established a number of useful operational systems and processes. These need to be embedded in centre practice.

Key Next Steps

The centre owner and ERO agree, that the key next steps to improve outcomes for children are to:

  • strengthen assessment, planning and evaluation processes and practices by:
    -evaluating individual learning, teaching strategies and the impacts of the prepared environment; and
    -developing a documented approach to group planning and evaluation
  • consolidate internal evaluation processes and practices by further developing a more coherent, evaluative approach
  • fully implement the recently-introduced staff appraisal system
  • further develop strategic and annual action plans.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Haywood Cottage Montessori completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. 

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Haywood Cottage Montessori will be in three years.

Jane Lee
Deputy Chief Review Officer Southern (Acting)

Te Waipounamu - Southern Region

16 November 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Geraldine, South Canterbury

Ministry of Education profile number

46521

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

27 children, two years and over

Service roll

22

Gender composition

Boys 14: Girls 8

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other ethnicities

  2
18
  2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

October 2017

Date of this report

16 November 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

No previous ERO reports

 

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.