Japanese Kindergarten

Education institution number:
10145
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Japanese ECE service
Total roll:
23
Telephone:
Address:

38 Pembroke Crescent, Glendowie, Auckland

View on map

Japanese Kindergarten

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Not meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified non-compliance with regulatory standards that must be addressed.

Background

The Japanese Kindergarten is a small centre providing a programme focused on the Japanese language and culture. A maximum of eight children attends each day and most children attend one day a week. The qualified centre manager supports a teaching assistant.

Summary of Review Findings

The service curriculum is consistent with the prescribed curriculum framework that applies to the service but requires some inclusion of te reo me ngā tikanga Māori. A philosophy statement guides the service’s operation. The service provides a language-rich environment that supports children’s learning. Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. The service curriculum respects and supports the right of each child to be confident in their own culture and encourages children to understand and respect other cultures.

Ongoing monitoring of premises and facilities, health and safety, and governance and management practices are required to sustain regulatory compliance.

Actions for Compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • children being given the opportunity to develop knowledge and an understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, C5.

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Ensuring that premises, furniture, furnishings, fittings, equipment, and materials are kept safe, and maintained in good condition (PF5, HS1).
  • Reducing the risk of injury from glass by ensuring that any windows or other areas of glass accessible to children are either made of safety glass or covered by an adhesive film designed to hold the glass in place in the event of it being broken (PF7).
  • Ensuring that equipment and materials are stored in safe spaces (PF8).
  • Ensuring a tempering valve or other accurate means of limiting hot water temperature is installed for the requirements of HS13 to be met (PF24).
  • Having a separate mattress that a sick child can use to lie down comfortably away from other children (PF27).
  • Having a first aid kit that complies with requirements (PF28).
  • Ensuring that there are a sufficient number of mattresses available if more than one child wants to sleep (PF29).
  • Ensuring that there is a sufficient amount of bedding available if more than one child wants to sleep (PF31).
  • Identifying a designated assembly area for evacuation purposes outside the building to keep children safe from further risk (HS5).
  • Documenting checks of equipment, premises, and facilities on every day of operation and having in place a documented risk management system that identifies hazards to the safety of children as being eliminated, isolated or minimised (HS12).
  • Ensuring that the temperature of warm water delivered from any taps that children can access independently is no higher than 40°C and comfortable for children at the centre to use (HS13).
  • Ensuring that water stored in any hot water cylinder is kept at a temperature of at least 60°C (HS14).
  • Maintaining a record of parental acknowledgement that approved medication has been administered to children (HS28).
  • Having a policy and procedure in place in regard to alcohol and other substances for staff, volunteers, parents, and visitors to the centre (HS33).
  • Providing information to parents about the amount and details of the expenditure of any Ministry of Education funding received by the service, and any planned reviews and consultation (GMA3).
  • Providing parents of children attending the service and adults providing education and care with opportunities to contribute to the development and review of the service’s operational documents (GMA4).
  • Implementation of a schedule of planned policy review and recorded outcomes of the review process (GMA6).

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends the Ministry follows up with the service provider to ensure that non-compliances identified in this report are addressed promptly.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Phil Cowie

Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)

Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

15 November 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Japanese Kindergarten

Profile Number

10145

Location

Glendowie, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

8 children over 2 years of age

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

35

Ethnic composition

NZ European/Pākehā 2, Japanese 30, other ethnic groups 3

Review team on site

August 2021

Date of this report

15 November 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, December 2017; Education Review, February 2014.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Japanese Kindergarten - 07/12/2017

1 Evaluation of Japanese Kindergarten

How well placed is Japanese Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

The Japanese Kindergarten is a small centre that provides an immersion programme, focused on Japanese language and culture, for eight children each day. The majority of children attend one day a week for full day or sessional care.

All children who attend the centre have Japanese cultural backgrounds, and are between two and five years of age. The centre has a waiting list for places, with some parents eager for their children to attend for more days during the week. Children play and learn in a mixed-age group. The owner/operator has NZ teaching qualifications. She employs two Japanese speaking, and trained early childhood teachers.

ERO's 2014 report noted settled children, and respectful and responsive interactions between teachers and children. These positive aspects are still evident in the programme. The report identified development priorities that included annual and strategic planning. It also recommended that the owner seek professional development about current research in early childhood teaching and management. The owner has made good progress in addressing these priorities.

The Review Findings

The centre programme is focused on learning in a full immersion Japanese language and cultural setting. Children are warmly welcomed at the start of the session, and encouraged to make choices about where they want to play. Teachers speak Japanese only in these conversations. Children settle quickly, play peacefully with others, and talk freely to teachers and their peers. They speak in Japanese, with varying levels of expertise, and are responsive to teachers' questions and suggestions.

Children are eager participants in the programme. The learning programme provides a blend of teacher-led and child-initiated play. Children have opportunities to listen to skilled story-telling by teachers, to join in musical experiences, and to be creative. Teachers use a thematic approach to help children to learn about traditional Japanese creative crafts, and extend their Japanese vocabulary.

The early childhood curriculum, Te Whāriki, includes the expectation that all children will learn about the dual cultural heritage of New Zealand. While this is not yet a strength in this already bilingual centre, teachers strive to include te reo Māori in meaningful contexts. The owner plans to develop this aspect of the programme.

Relationships with parents are open and inclusive. The owner regularly shares information about children's development with parents, both formally and informally. She invites parents' input into the programme. Parents comment about, and contribute to, planning for individual children. The recent development of portfolios for children is helping teachers to plan the programme. Portfolios are valued by both children and their parents.

Key Next Steps

ERO identified areas of the centre's operation that need attention. These include:

  • upskilling the teaching team about New Zealand's bicultural expectations as outlined in Te Whāriki, and including reference to te Tiriti o Waitangi in the centre's philosophy

  • continuing to work with an external mentor to strengthen teachers' understanding about current good practices in New Zealand early childhood education.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Japanese Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Japanese Kindergarten will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

7 December 2017

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Glendowie, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10145

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

8 children over 2 years of age

Service roll

41

Gender composition

Boys 26 Girls 15

Ethnic composition

Japanese/Pākehā
Japanese
Japanese/Chinese
other Japanese

19
11
7
4

Percentage of qualified teachers

50-79%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

October 2017

Date of this report

7 December 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

February 2014

Education Review

February 2011

Education Review

December 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.