Jemmas Homebased Childcare Auckland

Education institution number:
10209
Service type:
Homebased Network
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
42
Telephone:
Address:

31 Arabian Drive, Papamoa, Tauranga

View on map

Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland - 20/01/2021

1 Evaluation of Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland

How well placed is Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland is a family owned business operating in the North Island, including networks in Auckland. A quarter of the children enrolled are Māori. Educators provide programmes in their homes for up to four children at a time. The service's philosophy is based on Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and Christian values.

The management team includes two owners, a general manager, team leader and office administrator. The three coordinators, who are registered teachers, have been appointed in the past three years. Coordinators regularly visit children in the educators' homes and support educators to provide for children's learning and wellbeing.

Many positive outcomes identified in ERO's 2017 report continue to be evident, including coordinators providing good guidance to educators to support children's learning.

This review was one of two reviews of Jemma's homebased services in Auckland.

The Review Findings

The service's documents show that children form friendships within their home care groups and have regular opportunities to socialise with others in playgroup settings. Educators provide a wide range of homebased learning opportunities for children.

Children appear settled and engaged within the home and community environments. They are active participants in their learning. Educators and coordinators know children well and respond to their individual needs, interests and abilities. 

Partnerships with parents have been strengthened through the service's response to COVID-19. Parent/whānau perspectives contribute to the curriculum and support positive connections with educators and coordinators. Educators and coordinators work together to record children's learning. These good practices could be strengthened by increasing the extent to which children's cultures and languages are acknowledged and recognised in curriculum records. Assessment and planning could also be more responsive to the specific requirements of infants and toddlers.

Coordinators are developing collaborative ways of working. Their monthly records show they mentor and grow educator's knowledge and skills to support children's learning well. Coordinators could now focus on how they might contribute to the growth of each other's professional practice through reflective analysis and feedback.

The service has been working with an external provider to strengthen their internal evaluation practices. It could now be useful to develop specific improvement goals for the Auckland networks, that link to the strategic direction of the wider organisation.

Key Next Steps

Key next steps are for coordinators to:

  • increase the acknowledgement of children's cultures and languages, and the recognition of the specific requirements of infants and toddlers in individual curriculum records
  • continue to strengthen bicultural practices to increase children's knowledge of Māori as tangata whenua and to support success for tamariki Māori
  • more closely monitor the implementation of the service's health and safety policies and procedures.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland completed an ERO Home-based Education and Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration. 

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake. 

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services Northern

Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

20 January 2021 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Home-based Education and Care Service

Location

Henderson, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10209

Institution type

Homebased Network

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

60 children, including up to 60 aged under 2

Service roll

49

Standard or Quality Funded

Quality

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
Filipino
other ethnicities

12
17
 9
11

Number of qualified coordinators in the network

3

Required ratios of staff educators to children

Under 2

1:2

Over 2

1:4

Review team on site

September 2020

Date of this report

20 January 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

May 2017

Education Review

December 2012

Education Review

March 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to the draft methodology for ERO reviews in Home-based Education and Care Services: July 2014

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed
  • Well placed
  • Requires further development
  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service. 

Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland - 10/05/2017

1 Evaluation of Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland

How well placed is Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Jemmas Homebased Childcare and Education Service West Auckland is a privately owned and operated service. It is licensed to provide all day home-based education and care for 60 children, seven days a week. Educarers provide programmes for a maximum of four children at a time in their homes, including two children up to two years of age. Educarers in this service have a range of early childhood qualifications.

This is one of seven networks in the North Island and the owners are committed to delivering a high quality service. The service's philosophy promotes learning through play, and embraces cultural diversity and Christian values. A grandparent programme encourages and supports the education and care of children by their grandparents, under the guidance of Jemma's policies and procedures.

Two coordinators, who are qualified teachers, have been in their leadership role for about a year. Coordinators bring a variety of relevant skills and experiences to their position. Their main role is to regularly visit children in the educarers' homes and support educarers to provide for children's learning and wellbeing.

Since the 2012 ERO report, the owner has relocated the head office to Tauranga and replaced the Management Board with a Governance Board. The service administrator and coordinators report to the board monthly. In 2016 an external provider worked with coordinators to develop a strategic plan. The board also employed an external supervisor to coach and mentor the coordinators.

The service has a history of positive ERO reports. Many strengths identified in the 2012 ERO report continue to be evident. Strengthening self-review processes to focus on learning outcomes for children is an ongoing focus.

This review was one of two home-based reviews of Jemmas Auckland services. 

The Review Findings

Positive relationships between educarers, children and their families/whānau and collaborative team work continue to provide a sound foundation for promoting positive learning outcomes for children. Coordinators have developed a collaborative leadership model and work effectively to support each other.

The administrator and coordinators promote effective communication, partnerships and a strong sense of whanaungatanga. Coordinators make regular contact with educarers. They note that children display a strong sense of belonging in their home-based setting and this is clearly evident in learning records. Parents report high levels of satisfaction with the education and care that their children receive. Educarers are very satisfied in their work and with the support they receive.

Coordinators provide effective support and guidance to educarers. They model good practice and focus on how educarers can extend children's learning. Coordinators and educarers could now record specific professional learning goals that they will work on together and regularly document progress towards achieving these goals.

Educarers and coordinators know children well. They use Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, to plan programmes that respond to children's individual interests and dispositions. They ensure that the specific care needs of infants and toddlers are met. Resources are provided to extend and provide challenge for children's learning.

Journals provide a rich record of each child's learning. Coordinators and educarers, and often parents, contribute to these records. Coordinators could further support educarers and parents to extend children's learning by ensuring that the next steps they record children are clear and specific.

Educarers value children's home languages and cultures, and where possible support children's bilingual development. Coordinators are more intentionally supporting educarers to incorporate Aotearoa/New Zealand's bicultural heritage into their programmes. They consult with whānau Māori about their aspirations for their child's learning and respond positively to the information that is shared. They are planning to evaluate the bicultural curriculum in order to further strengthen it.

Educarers and parents have access to a wide variety of books and resources through the service's libraries. Supporting children's language development and making links between home and the service is a focus. Educarers make good use of community facilities. Children regularly participate in playgroups and outings that extend their learning opportunities. The service contributes to the cost of many of these experiences.

Coordinators are committed to ongoing improvement and are supported by the owner to attend regular professional learning and development. Coordinators have recently participated in a significant review of their appraisal process. They collate evidence to show how they meet the Education Council's requirements.

Managers and coordinators have improved internal evaluation procedures and practices. They have some very good systems for monitoring health and safety requirements. The owner and administrator annually visit educarers' homes with coordinators to nurture relationships and to observe how the service's expectations are being met.

Staff have collaborated to develop strategic goals that align with the service's philosophy. This process has supported coordinators to develop a shared sense of purpose and a deeper understanding of the service's philosophy, vision and values. Coordinators could now report progress towards meeting strategic goals in their monthly reports to the board.

Key Next Steps

To improve the quality of education and care, managers and coordinators agree to continue to strengthen the service's:

  • internal evaluation practices

  • bicultural curriculum and support for tamariki Māori to succeed as Māori.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland completed an ERO Home-based Education and Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

To improve current practices, managers should review policies and procedures to ensure that links with the requirements of the Vulnerable Children's Act 2014 are explicit. 

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Jemmas Homebased Childcare & Education Service West Auckland will be in three years.

Steffan Brough

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

10 May 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Home-based Education and Care Service 

Location

Henderson, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

10209

Institution type

Homebased Network

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

60 children, including up to 60 aged under 2

Service roll

44

Standard or Quality Funded

Quality

Gender composition

Boys 26 Girls 35

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Indian
British/Irish
Filipino
Chinese
other

6
41
3
2
2
2
5

Number of qualified coordinators in the network

2

Required ratios of staff educators to children

Under 2

1:2

Over 2

1:4

Review team on site

February 2017

Date of this report

10 May 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

December 2012

Education Review

Mach 2009

Education Review

October 2005

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to the draft methodology for ERO reviews in Home-based Education and Care Services: July 2014

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.