Kaikoura Playcentre

Education institution number:
65302
Service type:
Playcentre
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
20
Telephone:
Address:

Kaikoura Playcentre The Esplanade, Kaikoura

View on map

Kaikoura Playcentre - 09/08/2017

1 Evaluation of Kaikoura Playcentre

How well placed is Kaikoura Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further
development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kaikoura Playcentre operates under the guidance of the Canterbury Playcentre Association. It is a parent cooperative with parents encouraged to be involved in all aspects of the playcentre programme and management.

Kaikoura Playcentre operates three morning sessions a week. It has a close relationship with the adjoining primary school. Many of the families work in the tourist industry or local farms and often live in the area for a short time. The playcentre provides a meeting place for families with young children.

Parents have made significant progress in meeting the recommendations in the 2013 ERO report. They have established close partnerships with the wider Maori community. Te reo and tikanga Maori are well integrated into all aspects of centre operations. The association has strengthened its relationship with the playcentre and is providing more regular and ongoing support. This has improved the quality of parent involvement in the playcentre and learning opportunities provided for children.

This review was part of a cluster review of ten playcentres in the Canterbury Playcentre Association.

The Review Findings

Children are well supported to be confident, motivated and independent learners. They purposefully select activities and resources from the well-presented and inviting learning environment. Adults effectively extend children's learning by their involvement in the play. They let children take the lead and make good use of questioning, clarifying and suggestions to make learning meaningful and challenging.

Children are respected, valued and included. Adults use a range of effective ways to involve children in decisions for their wellbeing, learning and the playcentre. This helps children to confidently share their ideas and seek the opinion of others.

Te Ao Maori is successfully interwoven into all aspects of playcentre life. The parents have established strong partnerships with the local Marae and the Department of Conservation. Maori beliefs, values and tikanga are actively sought and embedded into the programme, celebrations and relationships. Children are proud of New Zealand's bicultural heritage and have high expectations that their world will include the two cultures equally.

Children with diverse needs and their families are well supported, valued and included in the programme and the playcentre. Parents of these children share their expertise and use this to successfully guide the ways other adults work and support the children in the programme. Children with diverse needs know that they belong and are important members of the playcentre family.

Infants and toddlers are active and confident explorers. They fully participate in the programme and are well supported by the parents and older children.

Parents make effective use of assessments and programme planning to know about individual children, their interests and what helps them learn. Parents value the knowledge that they all bring and find ways to use this knowledge to promote the learning of all children. More consistency in goal setting for children, use of teaching strategies and evaluating the outcomes for children would strengthen the usefulness of assessment and evaluation further.

Parents are actively involved in all aspects of playcentre operations. They effectively use association personnel, systems, guidelines and practices to provide a good foundation for centre operations. They also make very good use of the playcentre parent training programme and benefit from the regular visits from the centre support and education teams. Internal evaluation is well established and is regularly used by parents to identify what is going well and where further improvements can be made.

The centre support and education teams provide efficient and timely support and guidance for the playcentre. The parent education programme has become more accessible to parents. Noticeably more parents are participating in all levels of the training and are making good use of this new knowledge in the playcentre. The centre support team is successfully sharing useful knowledge and practices across the centres.

The Canterbury Playcentre Association has made significant progress since the 2014 ERO cluster review. It has implemented a strategic plan that effectively identifies goals, plans and progress. The association has high expectations for every child to experience high quality education and all parents to be actively involved in parent education and the management of playcentres. It has established some very useful systems and practices to ensure sustainability and improvement of the organisation and the playcentres. This includes effective evaluation and monitoring of the quality of education for parents and improved outcomes for children.

The key next step for the association is to review how well the individual playcentre's philosophies are meeting the changing contexts of the playcentres.

Key Next Steps

The association, parents and ERO agree that the key next steps for Kaikoura Playcentre are to:

  • improve consistency in assessment and planning
  • extend internal evaluation to focus more on outcomes for children
  • more regularly monitor, evaluate and report progress in achieving the strategic plan goals.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kaikoura Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service's systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Kaikoura Playcentre will be in three years.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Deputy Chief Review Officer Southern (Te Waipounamu)

9 August 2017

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO's reports provide information for parents and communities about each service's strengths and next steps for development. ERO's bicultural evaluation framework NO Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Kaikoura

Ministry of Education profile number

65302

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

29

Gender composition

Boys:   18

Girls:    11

Ethnic composition

Maori
Pakeha
Other

9
16
4

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%      50-79%              80%+
Based on funding rates

N/A

Under 2

Reported ratios of staff

1:1

requirements

Better than minimum

to children

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

April 2017

Date of this report

9 August 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

March 2013

Education Review

April 2012

 

Education Review

May 2008

 3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO's Evaluation Framework

ERO's overarching question for an early childhood education review is 'How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?' ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Nga Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere — how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Arahi — how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Matauranga —whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako— how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake — self review and of whanaungatanga — partnerships with parents and whanau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Maori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Nga Pou Here refer to ERO's Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO's Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed —The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed — The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development —The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO's website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service's context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Kaikoura Playcentre - 08/03/2013

1 Background

Introduction

A supplementary review is undertaken at the discretion of a National Manager, Review Services in the Education Review Office (ERO).

A supplementary review evaluates the extent and effectiveness of actions a centre has taken towards addressing issues specified in a previous education review and/or any additional areas identified since that review.

Terms of Reference

This supplementary review is based on an evaluation of the performance of the Kaikoura Playcentre governing body and management in relation to areas identified in the April 2012 ERO report or issues identified since that review. The terms of reference for this review are to investigate:

  • planning and assessment practices
  • self review
  • incorporating Māori perspectives
  • association support and centre sustainability.

2 The Education Review Office (ERO) Evaluation

Kaikoura Playcentre is one of 49 centres administered by the Canterbury Playcentre Association. The association’s education and centre support teams provide support for the centre. The parents’ cooperative is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the centre. The centre operates for two morning sessions each week for children aged from birth to school age.

The centre parents have made significant progress in improving the areas identified in the April 2012 ERO review report. They have established effective child assessment, planning and evaluation practices to improve learning outcomes for children. Self review is becoming well established. It is resulting in improvements to the programme and children’s learning opportunities. Bicultural perspectives are evident in the programme and the parents have plans to continue to increase te reo and tikanga Māori.

The playcentre association has increased its support for the centre. More parents are involved in the parent education programme. Their understanding of playcentre has increased and they are making good use of the information to improve children’s learning. The additional support from the association will need to be continued to ensure parents remain committed and the playcentre is sustained.

Positive and caring relationships between children and parents, evident at the time of the 2012 ERO review report, have been maintained. The playcentre is well organised, presented and resourced as also identified in the April 2012 ERO report.

Future Action

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

3 Findings

Planning and assessment practices

Background

The April 2012 ERO report identified that the parent group was in the early stages of re-establishing planning and assessment practices. Parents needed to focus on recording children’s learning and using the information to plan and provide programmes for children.

Areas of progress

The parents have made significant progress. They have made good use of the playcentre association parent training courses and guidelines for child assessment, planning and evaluation. Assessment and planning records provide useful and regular information about individual children’s learning and development. Child profiles identify children’s learning and progress. Programme plans are beginning to include useful information to help parents extend the learning of individual and small groups of children. Attractive wall displays give suggestions that help parents to support the learning of all children. The displays also suggest a range of ways that parents can contribute to assessment, planning and programme evaluation.

Area for further improvement

The parents are beginning, and need to continue, to increase the information in the child profiles about next steps for learning. They should particularly focus on the ways that parents can support this learning in their work with children during the programme.

Self review

Background

The April 2012 ERO report identified that the self-review purposes and practices needed to be better understood by the parent group. Processes for regular and useful self review that improved learning for children needed to be put in place.

Areas of progress

The centre parents have made significant progress. The parents have made effective use of the playcentre association guidelines for self review. The process clearly identifies areas for programme review, what is going well and what needs to be improved in these areas. The parents have developed some useful action plans for assessment, planning and evaluation and bicultural perspectives in the programme. As a result, significant progress has been made.

The parents have formed a self-review committee. The playcentre reviews are attractively displayed and show evidence of an in-depth self-review process that is resulting in improved outcomes for children.

Area for further improvement

The association and centre parents need to make sure the good self-review practices are sustained when changes of membership occur within the parent group.

Incorporating Māori perspectives in the programme

Background

The previous ERO report identified the need for parents to increase the bicultural knowledge, understanding and practices in the programme.

Areas of progress

The parents have made significant progress. They are making better use of the local Kaikoura environment to include bicultural perspectives into the centre programme. Wall displays often include te reo and tikanga Māori. The parents are beginning to sing waiata and use simple te reo Māori at the parent meetings and within the programme.

Area for further improvement

The parents have identified, and ERO agrees, that the next steps include strengthening partnerships with Māori families attending the centre and living in the wider local community.

Association support and centre sustainability

Background

The previous ERO report identified that the centre parents were not always well supported by the association. Parents were not very involved in the playcentre parent education programme. This was affecting the quality of the programme for children’s learning and systems for maintaining a safe and healthy environment for children.

Areas of progress

The playcentre is currently sustainable and well supported by local families and the association. The level of association support has increased since the previous ERO review. Parents are making good progress in completing the parent education courses. New families have enrolled at the centre and are becoming involved in the operation of the centre and the parent training programme.

Procedures for monitoring health and safety have improved. The centre provides an attractive and inviting environment for children and families.

Area for further improvement

The association, centre parents and ERO agree that the association needs to continue to provide additional support, particularly increasing parents’ access to the parent education programme within their community.

4 Future Action

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services

Southern Region

About the Centre

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Centres) Regulations 1998

Number licensed for

20 children, including up to 6aged under two

Roll number

27

Gender composition

Girls 15; Boys 12

Ethnic composition

New Zealand European/Pākehā 20
Māori 4
Other ethnicities 3

Review team on site

November 2012

Date of this report

8 March 2013

Previous ERO reports

Education Review April 2012

Education Review May 2008

Education Review June 2004

To the Parents and Community of Kaikoura Playcentre

This supplementary review evaluates the quality of education and care received by the children and the performance of the centre’s management in relation to specific terms of reference.

The Education Review Office [ERO] evaluation of Kaikoura Playcentre follows.

Kaikoura Playcentre is one of 49 centres administered by the Canterbury Playcentre Association. The association’s education and centre support teams provide support for the centre. The parents’ cooperative is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the centre. The centre operates for two morning sessions each week for children aged from birth to school age.

The centre parents have made significant progress in improving the areas identified in the April 2012 ERO review report. They have established effective child assessment, planning and evaluation practices to improve learning outcomes for children. Self review is becoming well established. It is resulting in improvements to the programme and children’s learning opportunities. Bicultural perspectives are evident in the programme and the parents have plans to continue to increase te reo and tikanga Māori.

The playcentre association has increased its support for the centre. More parents are involved in the parent education programme. Their understanding of playcentre has increased and they are making good use of the information to improve children’s learning. The additional support from the association will need to be continued to ensure parents remain committed and the playcentre is sustained.

Positive and caring relationships between children and parents, evident at the time of the 2012 ERO review report, have been maintained. The playcentre is well organised, presented and resourced as also identified in the April 2012 ERO report.

Future Action

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

When ERO has reviewed an early childhood centre we encourage management to inform their community of any follow-up action they plan to do. You should talk to the management or licensee if you have any questions about this evaluation, the full ERO report or their future intentions.

If you would like a copy of the full report, please contact the centre or see the ERO website, http://www.ero.govt.nz.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services

Southern Region