Kids Klub Childcare Centre

Education institution number:
10129
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
22
Telephone:
Address:

118 Chivalry Road, Glenfield, Auckland

View on map

Kids Klub Childcare Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyNot meeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified non-compliance with regulatory standards that must be addressed. 

Background

Kids Klub Childcare Centre has been under the same ownership for the past 23 years. A qualified owner leads a team of three registered teachers and three unqualified staff. The teaching team reflects the diverse ethnicities of the community. A small number of Pacific children attend this service. 

Summary of Review Findings

A philosophy statement guides the service’s operation. It expresses the service’s beliefs, values, and attitudes about the provision of early childhood education and care. The curriculum is consistent with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. A language-rich environment is provided to enhance children’s learning. 

Teachers support children’s developing social competence and understanding of appropriate behaviour. They engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. Positive steps are taken to respect and acknowledge the aspirations held by parents and whānau for their children. 

Better monitoring of systems and practices relating to premises and facilities, health and safety and governance and management, is needed to maintain regulatory standards.

Actions for Compliance 

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • having a current fire evacuation scheme approved by Fire and Emergency New Zealand

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS4. 

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided​ ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Ensuring there is a first aid kit that complies with the requirements of appendix 1 (PF28).
  • Ensuring all relevant emergency drills are carried out on at least a three-monthly basis. Having evidence of how evaluation of these drills has informed the annual review of the service’s emergency plan (HS8). 
  • Checking sleeping children for warmth, breathing, and general wellbeing at least every 5-10 minutes, or more frequently according to individual needs. Having evidence of these checks being undertaken (HS9).
  • Ensuring that all hazards to the safety of children are eliminated, isolated or minimised (HS12). 
  • Ensuring water stored in any hot water cylinder is kept at a temperature of at least 60°C (HS14). 
  • Consistently recording all injuries, illness, and incidents, including the time of the incident and evidence that parents have been notified/informed (HS27). 
  • Having a schedule showing the timelines for planned reviews and evaluations (GMA6). 
  • Having an annual plan identifying the ‘who’ in relation to key tasks, and how key tasks will have regard to the Statement of National Education and Learning Priorities (GMA8). 

Recommendation to Ministry of Education 

ERO recommends the Ministry follows up with the service provider to ensure that non-compliances identified in this report are addressed promptly.

Next ERO Review 

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation. 

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

12 December 2023

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NameKids Klub Childcare Centre
Profile Number10129
LocationGlenfield, Auckland
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for20 children, including up to 20 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 50-79%
Service roll22
Review team on siteNovember 2023
Date of this report12 December 2023
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, June 2020; Education Review, May 2016

 

General Information about Assurance Reviews 

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate. 

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice. 

Kids Klub Childcare Centre - 04/06/2020

1 Evaluation of Kids Klub Childcare Centre

How well placed is Kids Klub Childcare Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Kids Klub Childcare Centre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kids Klub Childcare Centre operates in a modified house and is licensed to provide for 20 children, including 20 under two years of age. Programmes are provided in a mixed-age environment. Specific staff have responsibility for babies and toddlers. The children are from an ethnically diverse local community.

The owner, who is a registered teacher, has managed the centre for 20 years. She is assisted by both registered and unregistered teachers, some of whom work at the centre part-time.

The centre's philosophy is consistent with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and influenced by a broad range of approaches. It acknowledges each child's uniqueness and the importance of working in partnership with families.

The 2016 ERO report commented positively about warm relationships and positive interactions that supported children's language development. Areas for development included the assessment of children's learning and programme planning, and aspects of centre management. There has been some progress in these areas.

The Review Findings

The education and care programmes for children at Kids Klub Early Childcare Centre promote positive learning outcomes for children. Children benefit from teachers who engage them in supportive relationships and meaningful interactions. They are settled and confidently approach adults. Programmes enable children to make decisions about their play.

The learning environments are well resourced, and children make good use of available equipment to support their play. Children readily move between the indoor and outdoor area and teachers help them to access additional resources to follow their interests.

Children under two are well cared for. Teachers follow the routines of the individual child. There is good communication between parents and the teachers who take additional responsibility of the younger children. Regular conversations with parents are supplemented by a diary that records what is happening for the child at the centre and at home.

The centre has an inclusive culture and children with additional learning needs are supported. Teachers have knowledge of some of the children's home languages and cultures. They support them and their families as they become more familiar with the English language and the culture of Aotearoa New Zealand. Aspects of tikanga and te reo Māori are integrated into the programme. The centre manager is supporting teachers to build their capability and confidence in these areas.

The older children have many opportunities through their Wild Cats programme to develop early literacy and numeracy skills. Teachers could now review the extent to which this learning is occurring in the context of play. They could also explore how this programme might promote more collaborative and complex play that encourages children and teachers to revisit learning.

Some progress has been made to strengthen the recording of the assessment of children's learning and programme planning. The wall display of children's interests is a good way to share information with all staff and with parents. It is important that teachers keep this information up-to-date. The manager could strengthen these processes by setting clear guidelines to support unqualified staff to contribute more to children's portfolios and programme planning.

The manager has accessed external support to strengthen staff internal evaluation capability. Staff have begun to evaluate some aspects of centre operations. Other aspects of centre management need further work.

The owner has acknowledged the strengths and interests of staff who support her in her roles as centre leader and manager. They take lead roles in tasks such as policy review, programme planning and setting up the environment.

Key Next Steps

Some of the next steps identified in the 2016 ERO report still need to be addressed. These include:

  • strengthening the appraisal process to ensure that registered staff are appraised against the standards for the teaching profession
  • strengthening strategic planning to guide ongoing improvement so that development happens in a timely fashion
  • clearly documenting the tasks that need to be done each year in the centre's annual plan
  • ensuring that all policies and procedures are current and easily available to staff.

Recommendation

ERO recommends that the centre manager continues to engage external advisory support to build on recent progress and to improve management capability.

ERO has requested from the service provider, an action plan that shows how the priorities for improvement will be addressed. ERO will request progress updates against the plan.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kids Klub Childcare Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)

Northern Region - Te Tai Raki

4 June 2020

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationGlenfield, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number10129
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for20 children, including up to 20 aged under 2 years
Service roll19
Gender compositionBoys 12 Girls 7
Ethnic compositionMāori 
NZ European/Pākehā 
Chinese
Indian
other ethnic groups
1



8
Percentage of qualified teachers0-49%
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:3Better than minimum requirements
Over 21:6Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteNovember 2019
Date of this report4 June 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewMay 2016
Education ReviewMarch 2013
Education ReviewFebruary 2010

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed
  • Well placed
  • Requires further development
  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Kids Klub Childcare Centre - 16/05/2016

1 Evaluation of Kids Klub Childcare Centre

How well placed is Kids Klub Childcare Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kids Klub Childcare Centre is located in Glenfield, North Shore. The owner/manager has been operating the centre for seventeen years. The centre is licensed for 20 children, including a maximum of 20 under 2 years of age. Plans are currently underway to extend the building and centre licence to cater for up to 40 children. The owner/manager and centre supervisor hold full practising certificates.

The centre philosophy promotes education in a homely environment. It values children's independence and has a positive ERO reporting history. Previous ERO reports acknowledge its welcoming and friendly environment and well-resourced programme. These aspects continue to be evident.

The staff has undergone significant change with the departure of several long-serving team members. A new supervisor and two teachers have been appointed to the teaching team since the last ERO review. Given these changes in personnel, centre leaders are prioritising working together as a new team to build shared understandings and collaborative practice to support effective teaching and learning. These recent changes have also impacted on the extent to which the centre has been able to progress the areas for development that were identified in the 2013 ERO report.

The Review Findings

Children are settled and enjoy engaging in mixed age play for much of the day. They have caring, warm relationships with their peers and teachers. Children freely access the indoor and outdoor areas. They experience uninterrupted play and opportunities for early literacy and mathematics learning, physical activity, science and imaginative play. Older children are challenged to question and explore ideas through projects and inquiries. The varied programme offered helps to develop children's social skills and encourages their curiosity through play.

Infants and toddlers experience nurturing care and support in a calm environment. The owner/manager models good teaching practice in her responsive interactions with the youngest children. She constantly chats with children and children have good opportunities to develop their language skills.

Te reo Māori is integrated naturally into conversations. The next step is to support all teachers' confidence in using te reo Māori and delivering a bicultural curriculum for children.

Centre leaders are beginning to build teachers' shared understanding of an emergent curriculum through collaborative planning. Teachers are developing their analysis and interpretation of children's learning. Leaders agree that the centre should access external professional development as part of ongoing work to strengthen teachers' capability in programme planning, assessment and evaluation.

Self review is in the early stages of development. Teachers have focused on improving the learning environment and have begun to use a recording template to help them link centre self review to children's learning. Centre leaders seek parent and whānau feedback and use this information to help teachers respond to parents' aspirations for their children and to support management decisions. The use of external advice and guidance to further progress centre self review and build teachers' reflective practice would be beneficial for strengthening both planned and emergent self-review.

Centre administration and management documentation are areas for improvement. Developments should include regularly reviewing and maintaining up-to-date strategic and annual planning, policies, procedures and guidelines for centre operations. The teacher appraisal process is also in need of refinement to reflect recent changes in Education Council requirements.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders agree that centre priorities for improvement include:

  • accessing professional learning and development to support the development of self review and strategic and annual planning that improves outcomes for children
  • using external professional development and networking to strengthen programme planning and assessment
  • providing individualised professional learning for teachers.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kids Klub Childcare Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Kids Klub Childcare Centre will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

16 May 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationGlenfield, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number10129
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for20 children, including up to 20 aged under 2
Service roll23
Gender compositionGirls 13 Boys 10
Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Chinese

Australian

Dutch

Indian

South African

South American

other ethnicities

2

5

4

2

2

2

2

2

2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:4Better than minimum requirements
Over 21:8Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteFebruary 2016
Date of this report16 May 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewMarch 2013
Education ReviewFebruary 2010
Education ReviewFebruary 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.