Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark

Education institution number:
5448
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
46
Telephone:
Address:

228 Queenspark Drive, Burwood, Christchurch

View on map

Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark - 05/08/2019

1 Evaluation of Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark

How well placed is Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark is one of 69 early learning services governed and managed by Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Association Incorporated, trading as Kidsfirst Kindergartens.

The kindergarten provides for the education and care of young children from two years to school age. All teachers/kaiako are qualified and certified early childhood education teachers/kaiako. The association education manager (EM) provides consistent professional advice and guidance to support the effective operation of the service.

The kindergarten's vision is to promote a stimulating and empowering environment for children regarding biculturalism, learning, inclusion, responsiveness to children's needs, and partnerships with parents and the community.

ERO's previous report noted that the leaders and teachers needed to continue to strengthen assessment, programme planning and evaluation documentation. While some progress has been made, further work needs to be done in these areas.

This review was part of a cluster of eight kindergartens governed and managed by the Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

Strong, responsive relationships among and with teachers, children, whānau and the wider community support the learning and wellbeing of children. Teachers establish reciprocal and respectful relationships with each family, supporting children’s sense of belonging. They value and acknowledge parents' and whānau aspirations for their children. There are close links with the neighbouring school that effectively support children's transition to school. Children are settled, engaged, and building social and emotional competence.

Leaders and teachers value children’s language, culture and identity. Teachers are learning about local hapū and iwi, their history, sites of significance and kawa, and incorporating this into the programme in a meaningful and respectful manner. Kaupapa Māori concepts such as manaakitanga, and whanaungatanga are integral to curriculum decisions. Teachers seek ways to maintain children’s connections to their cultural identity. They work hard to use children’s first language, supported by prompts in the environment, resources, and thoughtful use of information and communication technologies. Children and their families know their culture is valued in the kindergarten.

The programme is increasingly responsive to the diverse needs and interests of children. The physical environment offers challenges that invite children to explore and become fully involved in a wide variety of activities. Teachers work collaboratively to organise and manage the learning environment and routines to support children's learning. They have adapted the programme for the wide age range of children and provide opportunities for children to take on leadership roles.

The Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Association has a well-developed and clearly understood vision. It is underpinned by targeted strategic and annual planning systems. There are close links between the kindergarten plans, internal evaluation, appraisal and professional development. Teachers are well supported by association managers and leaders to achieve the priorities of the kindergarten and to promote high quality learning outcomes for all children.

Since the last review, a restructure has enabled a key focus on education excellence within the kindergartens, and innovation and collaboration within the association and in the wider early childhood community. Key staff make a significant contribution to supporting other early learning services in Te Waipounamu / South Island.

The association has a very strong commitment to providing high quality professional development to build on leadership capacity and teacher capability. Association leaders have high expectations for teaching, learning and equitable outcomes for all children. This includes promoting understandings of and respect for te ao Māori at all levels of the organisation. The association's internal evaluation practices are being well used to inform decision making and support the strong focus on continuous improvement.

Key Next Steps

ERO and centre leaders agree that the next steps for the kindergarten are to:

  • strengthen evaluative thinking in planning, assessment and internal evaluation
  • make intentional teaching clearer in documentation
  • review and revise the kindergarten's vision and curriculum priorities, in consultation with children and whānau, so that they are more specifically focused on valued outcomes for Queenspark kindergarten children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Director Review and Improvement Services Te Tai Tini

Southern Region

5 August 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Christchurch

Ministry of Education profile number

5448

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children, two years of age and over

Service roll

56

Gender composition

Boys 36, Girls 20

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
Other ethnicities

6
40
10

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2019

Date of this report

5 August 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

February 2014

Education Review

June 2010

Education Review

September 2005

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark - 18/02/2014

1 Evaluation of Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark

How well placed is Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark is located in east Christchurch. This review was a part of a cluster of 11 kindergartens governed and managed by the Canterbury Westland Kindergarten Association Incorporated, trading as Kidsfirst Kindergartens.

Since the 2010 ERO review, the teaching team, including the head teacher, has changed. The education service manager (ESM) has remained the same. She has provided consistent support to the different teaching teams and the community. The current teachers work well together. They are enthusiastic, strongly focused on providing positive outcomes and treat children and their families with respect.

Children’s sense of belonging is well supported through the transitions into and within the service and when they move to school. The head teacher has developed purposeful links with the neighbouring school to help foster successful transitions for children.

The Review Findings

Teachers actively foster positive relationships with children, parents and whānau. Children benefit from comforting and caring interactions with teachers. Teachers help children to develop confidence in themselves as capable, independent learners. They grow children's leadership skills. Children’s efforts and successes are acknowledged and celebrated. Teachers and children enjoy each other’s company and have fun together.

Teachers value the language, identity and culture of all children and their families. They work with families in sensitive and respectful ways.

Teachers and parents share information to support children’s wellbeing and learning at the kindergarten and at home. Parent views and contributions to the programme are appreciated by teachers.

Children are well supported to direct their own learning, and to contribute to decisions about the programme, resources and environment. Their views are respected and valued. Teachers are skilful in the ways they recognise and respond to children’s interests. There is a good balance between the excited buzz and the calm, settled hum of learning.

Teachers are very good at listening to children’s views and acting on them in thoughtful ways. They involve children in interactions and conversations that extend their comprehension and verbal language skills. Teachers encourage children to think more deeply and investigate their ideas.

Teachers provide a good selection of resources that reflect the context of children’s learning. They set resources up in ways that encourage children to make their own discoveries. Children are actively involved in a wide range of interesting experiences such as:

  • imaginative play, creative activities and physical challenges
  • learning about the natural world and sustainable practices
  • increasing use of information and communication technologies.

Literacy and numeracy are strongly promoted and woven into the learning programme. Children are very well prepared for school within the daily programme.

Children have many opportunities to learn about bicultural practices that are respectful and meaningful to the Māori culture. Teacher’s professional learning of te reo and tikanga Māori has been well used with children who are developing their own skills in this area.

The association is strongly focused on providing a consistent approach to building on, and supporting teachers’ professional practice. In particular, teachers are well supported in developing their understanding of te ao Māori and making this more evident in documentation and practices.

The association has high expectations for teaching and learning. The use of recently developed indicators is helping to identify and spread good practice. Appraisal is used effectively to recognise teachers' strengths and where further developments may be necessary to improve teaching and learning.

Leadership is a strength of the kindergarten. The ESM, head teachers and teachers have a shared understanding of, and commitment to, the kindergarten’s vision. They are making good use of systematic, planned approaches to self review.

Teaching practices are strengthened through well-targeted professional development. The strengths and interests of teachers are recognised and used well. Teachers are making very good use of kindergarten processes and practices to improve the quality of teaching and learning opportunities for children.

The association provides effective governance and management for all of its kindergartens. The long-term vision and goals for all kindergartens are determined by the governing board. Each individual kindergarten establishes its own plan incorporating the board's goals. The association responded appropriately to the circumstances of Canterbury and Westland communities by removing all fees.

Each kindergarten is supported by education support managers (ESMs) who make regular visits and provides well-targeted professional development. In particular, teachers are well supported in developing their understanding of te ao Māori and making this more evident in documentation and practices. This remains an area for further development in this kindergarten.

The association has high expectations for teaching and learning. The use of recently developed indicators of good practice is helping to identify and spread effective practice. Appraisal is used effectively to recognise areas of strength and where further developments may be necessary.

Key Next Steps

The leaders and teachers have identified, and ERO agrees, that they will continue to strengthen assessment, programme planning and evaluation documentation.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Kidsfirst Kindergartens Queenspark will be in four years.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services Southern Region

18 February 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Queenspark, Christchurch

Ministry of Education profile number

5448

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children, aged over two years

Service roll

49

Gender composition

Boys 26; Girls 23

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Pacific

Other ethnicities

7

38

2

2

Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80% Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

November 2013

Date of this report

18 February 2014

Most recent ERO reports 

Education Review

June 2010

 

Education Review

September 2005

 

Accountability Review

January 2001

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.