Kidz Kindy @75

Education institution number:
45321
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
44
Telephone:
Address:

75 Budge Street, Blenheim

View on map

Kidz Kindy @75

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence. 

ERO’s judgements for Kidz Kindy @75 are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whakatō Emerging

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 
Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whakatō Emerging

Whakatō Emerging

2 Context of the Service

Kidz Kindy @75 provides education and care for children under three years old. A newly appointed centre manager, general manager and head teacher lead a newly established team. At the time of the review a small number of children enrolled were Māori

3 Summary of findings

Infants and toddlers experience highly responsive, calm relationships with teachers. Teaching practices promote independence and intentionally give priority to developing oral language. Teachers are responsive to children’s verbal and non-verbal cues. 

Children, and their parents and whānau have some opportunities to contribute to the centre wide curriculum. The newly established team are beginning to develop relationships with parents and whānau. Their goals for their children’s learning are sought regularly. Teachers are yet to use these, and the learning outcomes in Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, when formally planning for children’s individual interests and the wider curriculum. Assessment documentation follows children’s interests, makes learning visible and shows some progression over time. 

Development of the bicultural curriculum is in the early stages. Some te reo Māori is heard throughout day, especially within daily routines. Leaders have identified that this is an area for significant strengthening.

The new leadership team is in the process of developing organisational conditions for improvement. Relational trust is building across the service. Changes to the provision of professional support and learning are being implemented. Teachers actively take responsibility for their own professional learning and development. A range of quality improvement processes such as teacher inquiry, reflection, and self-review, enable teachers to gather and use information on their teaching and to change individual and collective practice. However, the full process of internal evaluation is not understood by the wider team to promote its use to identify what impact these changes are having on children’s outcomes.

4 Improvement actions

Kidz Kindy @75 will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Identify the service’s learning priorities for children, alongside parents and whānau, to strengthen the localised curriculum.
  • Build shared understanding within the teaching team of the learning outcomes of Te Whāriki and how these can be used within planning, assessment, and evaluation of children’s learning. 
  • Strengthen relationships with whānau Māori to understand what success looks like for their tamariki and identify strategies to promote this.
  • Strengthen the team’s collaborative understanding of, and engagement in, internal evaluation. 

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kidz Kindy @75 completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

6 Action for Compliance 

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliance: 

  • Ensuring daily checks of equipment, premises, and facilities for hazards to children contain all areas required by the licensing criterion, and accident/incident records are analysed to identify hazards and appropriate action is taken (HS12). 

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

30 November 2023 

7 About the Early Childhood Service 

Early Childhood Service NameKidz Kindy @75
Profile Number45321
LocationBlenheim
Service type Education and care service
Number licensed for 23 children, including up to 15 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 80-99%
Service roll30
Review team on siteOctober 2023 
Date of this report30 November 2023
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, February 2019  

Kidz Kindy @75 - 07/02/2019

1 Evaluation of Kidz Kindy @75

How well placed is Kidz Kindy @75 to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Kidz Kindy @75 is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kidz Kindy @75 is one of two early learning centres owned by the same licensee. The centres operate in close proximity to each other. This centre is licensed for 23 children. It caters for the care and education of children under three years old from a culturally rich community.

Since the March 2017 ERO report there has been a change in the ownership and the leadership of the service. There have also been changes to the teaching team. A centre manager oversees the operation of both services. Most of the staff are qualified and registered teachers.

The 2017 ERO report identified a need to improve management systems. The new owner and staff have made progress in addressing all areas identified in the report. They have developed a shared philosophy and ways of working across both of the centres. Transitions between the centres are well managed.

This review was part of a cluster of two early learning centre reviews in the Kidz Kindy Service.

The Review Findings

Leaders show a strong commitment to the philosophy and goals of the service. They promote shared understandings among teachers to ensure that the philosophy is clearly reflected in practice.

Leaders and teachers carefully consider children at the centre of their decision making. They are aware of their responsibility to advocate and provide equitable and positive outcomes for all children. Children with additional needs are well supported to succeed in their learning.

Leaders and teachers foster positive, reciprocal relationships with children, parents and whānau. They value the language, culture and identity of families and the contributions that families make to the programme and their children's learning.

Teachers provide a broad rich curriculum for children. They recognise, value and promote the unique characteristics of infants and toddlers. Teachers establish caring, sensitive and nurturing interactions to foster children's sense of wellbeing and belonging. Children benefit from flexible, predictable routines that are responsive to their individual interests, strengths and needs. They are well supported to develop oral language, independence and social skills.

Children are actively involved in a wide range of interesting learning experiences and activities that promote their curiosity and the excitement of discovery. Teachers make purposeful use of the environment and provision of resources to encourage children's participation in the learning programme and exploration of the natural world.

Leaders value and make good use of teachers' strengths, interests and passions to enhance the curriculum. They promote collaborative ways of working to build emergent leadership capacity and teacher capability. Ongoing observation, assessment and planning of everyday activities builds a picture of what children know, understand, feel, are interested in and can do.

Leaders and teachers are building a reflective culture that is focused on continuous improvement and positive outcomes for all children.

Key Next Steps

The new centre owner and leaders have made significant progress in developing a number of new initiatives to support effective management and curriculum practices.

Centre leaders have identified, and ERO's evaluation has confirmed, that the key next steps are to strengthen:

  • the provision of a bicultural curriculum
  • consistency of effective internal evaluation processes and practices
  • appraisal and attestation processes.

ERO has identified that assessment, planning and evaluation documentation needs to be further developed to build consistency of best practice across the teaching team.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kidz Kindy @75 completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

During the on-site stage of the review ERO identified that category 3 medication was not always authorised by parents on the daily medication schedule. Leaders were responsive to this finding and initiated an assurance process before the end of the on-site stage of the review.

Leaders must ensure that there is evidence of written authority from parents for the administration of medication in accordance with the requirement for category 3 medication [Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Services 2008, HS25, Reg 46]

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Kidz Kindy @75 will be in three years.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review and Improvement Services

Te Waipounamu - Southern Region

7 February 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationBlenheim
Ministry of Education profile number45321
Licence typeEducation & Care Service
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for23 children, over the age of three years old, including 15 under two years old
Service roll37
Gender compositionGilrs 22, Boys 15
Ethnic compositionMāori 
Pākehā
Other ethnicities
11 
20
6

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:4Better than minimum requirements
Over 21:4Better than minimum requirements
Review team on siteNovember 2018
Date of this report7 February 2019

Most recent ERO reports

 

Education ReviewMarch 2017
Education ReviewAugust 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Beavertown Early Learning Centre Preschool - 28/03/2017

1 Evaluation of Beavertown Early Learning Centre Preschool

How well placed is Beavertown Early Learning Centre Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

The service provider has yet to put in place effective management practices that promote high quality learning and teaching for all children. The leaders need to improve management systems and practices and aspects of the curriculum to provide better learning and teaching outcomes.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Beavertown Early Learning Centre Preschool is one of two centres managed by the owner. The centres operate in close proximity to each other. Prior to the centre being relicensed in March 2013 under the Education (Early Childhood) Regulations 2008, it was restructured to cater better for children’s needs.

The Preschool now provides education and care mostly for infants and toddlers under two in a mixed aged setting. Since the 2013 ERO review there have been a number of staff changes including the centre manager. A number of staff are qualified early childhood teachers. Families from an increasingly-diverse range of cultures attend the centre.

The Review Findings

Children and families are warmly welcomed into the centre where positive relationships with children, parents and whānau are fostered.

Staff are nurturing, supportive and attentive to children's emerging interests. Interactions are unhurried so children are able to make their own choices about their play.

The centre has spacious outdoor areas that provide children with many opportunities to explore, discover, and experience the natural world. The centre environment and visits outside of the centre provide children with a good range of learning opportunities.

Children under two years old have many opportunities to move freely and explore their environment.

Transitions into the centre and beyond are well planned and flexible to meet child and family needs. Children with additional learning needs are well supported. Teachers work closely with their families and external agencies.

Teachers are increasing bicultural practices. Children have opportunities to hear some te reo Māori. Teachers incorporate aspects of tikanga Māori into daily programmes.

Key Next Steps

The leaders/managers need to improve management systems and practices to provide a better quality of service.

They need to establish an effective management structure that includes:

  • strategic planning that is closely linked to the centre's philosophy and vision

  • a well understood, planned and implemented programme of internal evaluation

  • a robust staff appraisal process that meets the Education Council criteria for registered teachers

  • a useful and well understood assessment and programme planning process

  • continued development and embedding of bicultural perspectives to improve Māori success for Māori.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Beavertown Early Learning Centre Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to governance and management, curriculum and health and safety.

To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • governance and management

  • assessment and planning

  • aspects of health and safety.

[Education (ECS) Regulations 2008, (GMA6), 43, (1a), (6) (C2), (HS31)]

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service, in consultation with the Ministry of Education, develops a plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Beavertown Early Learning Centre Preschool will be within two years.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Deputy Chief Review Officer, Southern - Te Waipounamu

28 March 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Blenheim

Ministry of Education profile number

45321

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

23 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

30

Gender composition

Girls 13; Boys 17

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Pacific

Other Ethnicities

13

12

3

2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+ Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets minimum requirements

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

December 2016

Date of this report

28 March 2017

Most recent ERO report

 

Education Review

August 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.