Lower Hutt City Childcare Centre

Education institution number:
60225
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
47
Telephone:
Address:

2 St Albans Grove, Lower Hutt CBD, Lower Hutt

View on map

Lower Hutt City Childcare Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Lower Hutt City Childcare Centre is a community-based early childhood service supported by a charitable trust. A recently appointed centre manager runs the day-to-day operations of the service, supported by two head teachers. The service regained its full licence in June 2021 after addressing areas of non-compliance in governance and management, health and safety, and premises and facilities.

Summary of Review Findings

The service curriculum is inclusive and informed by assessment, planning and evaluation aligned to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. It provides children with a range of experiences and opportunities to support their interests and needs.

The design and layout of the premises support the provision of different types of indoor and outdoor experiences. Governance and management implement suitable human resource practices, teacher appraisal and internal evaluation. They promote opportunities to collaborate with parents and whānau about the service operations. An increased level of monitoring of health and safety practices is required.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include strengthening the quality of planning and assessment for learning, particularly in relation to:  

  • clearly aligning children’s learning to Te Whāriki learning outcomes

  • consistent acknowledgment of children’s cultures, languages and identities

  • intentionally evaluate the effectiveness of teaching on outcomes for children.  

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • a current Fire Evacuation Scheme approved by the New Zealand Fire Service

  • heavy furniture, fixtures, and equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage are secured in the over two years learning area, including the sleep room

  • consistent records that show daily hazards are undertaken in the under two room

  • a record of training and/or information provided to adults who administer medicine to children (other than their own) while at the service.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008; HS4, HS6, HS12, HS29.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

23 March 2022 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Lower Hutt City Childcare Centre

Profile Number 60225
Location Lower Hutt

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

47 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

56

Ethnic composition

Māori 3, NZ European/Pākehā 39, Pacific heritages 4, Other ethnic groups 10

Review team on site

January 2022

Date of this report

23 March 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review February 2018, Education Review June 2014

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Lower Hutt City Childcare Centre - 15/02/2018

1 Evaluation of Lower Hutt City Childcare Centre

How well placed is Lower Hutt City Childcare Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Lower Hutt City Childcare Centre is a long-established, community-based early childhood service. It operates as a not-for-profit centre supported by a charitable trust.

A management committee made up of families and the supervisor undertakes a governance role. The supervisor is also responsible for daily operation. The service is licensed for a maximum of 47 children, including 15 children aged up to two years. Renovations to the inside and outside areas have recently been completed.

The centre philosophy reflects the values of members and families. It supports new teachers to the service to know the teaching team beliefs.

In the 2014 ERO report, next steps included improving teaching and learning, considering success for Māori children as Māori, and developing programme planning. There has been improvement in these areas.

The Review Findings

Children show a strong sense of belonging. They are empowered to take ownership of their learning by making decisions and choices. Children and adults are respectful of each other. A positive tone prevails. Children are seen as competent and confident learners. They are given space to develop their learning and time to play at their own pace.

Assessment, planning and evaluation processes have been revised since 2014. Clear expectations have been developed to guide teacher practice. An improved focus on outcomes for children and how teachers notice, recognise and respond to learning is evident.  Children's interests are central to the planning and implementation of the service's curriculum.

A wide selection of numeracy and literacy experiences is available. Children engage independently and with teachers to enjoy these opportunities. Routines are flexible to respond to individual needs. Group times are well-considered.

The newly renovated area for up to 2 year olds promotes an environment that is responsive to the needs and attributes of the youngest learners. Teachers deliberately support children's learning and well-being through taking time to learn about their home routines and family expectations.

The service's response to cultural inclusion is ongoing and well considered. Teachers establish a culture in which children are valued, celebrated and affirmed. Significant improvement in the bicultural curriculum is evident and supports all children to grow as New Zealanders in Aotearoa. Leaders agree continuing to develop a shared understanding of a programme that focuses on te ao Māori and reflects the local community is a next step.  

Teachers' strengths are acknowledged and they are encouraged to use their expertise for the benefit of the service. A next step is for leaders to further promote and provide opportunities for leadership to be built, shared and distributed.

The centre manager seeks opportunities to professionally interact with other early learning service providers. A priority for the governance team is to review the appraisal system to support teacher development and to meet the Education Council requirements.

Understanding and use of self review and internal evaluation should be strengthened to further promote high quality outcomes for children. 

Key Next Steps

ERO has identified through its external evaluation that the service manager and trustees should continue to:

  • review all aspects of the teacher appraisal system that support development and meets accountabilities
  • build leadership for teaching and learning
  • develop processes that support trustees to clarify their roles and responsibilities. 

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Lower Hutt City Childcare Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist.  In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration. 

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Actions for compliance

ERO found an area of non-compliance in the service related to governance and management. The service provider must ensure:

  • that the service is effectively governed and managed in accordance with good management practices, including all staff are appraised with a robust system for development of management and teaching roles and that meets the Education Council requirements

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA 7].

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Lower Hutt City Childcare Centre will be in three years.

Alan Wynyard
Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

15 February 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Lower Hutt

Ministry of Education profile number

60225

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

47 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

46

Gender composition

Boys 25, Girls 21

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other ethnicities

  9
27
10

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:6

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

December 2017

Date of this report

15 February 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2014

Supplementary Review

April 2011

Supplementary Review

February 2010

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.