Lupesina Aoga Amata Preschool - 26/06/2015

1 Evaluation of Lupesina Aoga Amata Preschool

How well placed is Lupesina Aoga Amata Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

The centre needs further support to improve the programme for children, develop sustainable and effective self review systems and to strengthen leadership capacity.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.


Lupesina Aoga Amata Preschool is a bilingual Samoan centre located on the grounds of Glendene School in West Auckland. The centre is licensed for 50 children, including 10 up to two years of age. It works closely with Glendene School to support children to transition positively from early childhood to primary school.

The centre’s philosophy is aligned to the principles of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. The philosophy also values parent partnership with teachers as key to children’s learning.

The service is owned by an incorporated society and governed by a board of trustees. Members of the board include staff members and a parent representative. A centre director oversees the daily operations and administration of the service.

The centre opened in 2010 and was first reviewed by ERO in 2012. Since then its roll has increased and is now operating at full capacity. The centre has 14 staff that include five qualified early childhood education (ECE) teachers.

The 2012 ERO report identified that the centre was providing a culturally responsive curriculum in the Samoan language and culture, and in te ao and te reo Māori. These good practices have been sustained. However, managers and teachers have made little progress in the areas ERO identified as needing improvement.

The Review Findings

Teachers' relationships with parents and whānau are responsive, reciprocal and respectful, supporting children to have a strong sense of belonging. Teachers support children to play inclusively and cooperatively with other children.

Children are settled and actively participate in the activities provided by teachers. They independently access resources and have some opportunities to make decisions about their play. Teachers model Samoan language and culture, and include aspects of te reo and tikanga Māori in the programme.

Infants and toddlers have a separate room. Their care routines are individualised to their needs. Teachers in this room are affectionate and help promote children’s exploration and language development. As teachers build their knowledge of effective education for this age group, they should provide more stimulating and developmentally appropriate programmes.

Teachers are developing programmes that involve children participating in teacher-directed activities. Teachers should be planning activities that follow children’s interests and are aligned toTe Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Older children are provided with formalised learning activities. Teachers should now promote literacy, mathematics and science as part of children's play.

The learning environment is well defined and, after morning tea, children can choose between indoor and outdoor play. The large outdoor playground is popular with children. The inside walls and doors of the building are in need of a good clean. The board should also prioritise renewing some of the outdoor equipment and indoor resources. A wider variety of good quality resources is needed to challenge and extend children’s learning and play.

Key Next Steps

The centre director agrees that teachers will need support to develop:

  • a systematic approach to planning for and assessing children’s learning over time
  • robust self review processes to evaluate teaching practices and promote better learning outcomes for children
  • shared understandings of what effective teaching looks like in relation to current early childhood educational theories.

The centre director recognises that she and board must act with urgency to:

  • support centre leaders to build their leadership capacity
  • implement appraisal processes for teachers aligned to the Registered Teacher Criteria
  • develop the centre’s strategic and annual plans in consultation with teachers and parents, and to formally document key actions made to achieve the centre’s goals.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Lupesina Aoga Amata Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to the quality of the curriculum, leadership and self review. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • plan programmes that are clearly responsive to children’s individual strengths and interests
  • establish formal and regular self-review practices to guide ongoing improvement and sustainable good practice
  • ensure suitable personnel management practices are implemented and a high quality professional mentoring programme is developed to support provisionally registered teachers
  • implement appraisal procedures using the Registered Teacher Criteria. Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, C2, GMA 6, 7, Education (Registration of Early Childhood Services Teachers) Regulations 2004, Part 10 of Education Act 1989.

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service, in consultation with the Ministry of Education, develop an action plan to address the key next steps and actions for compliance outlined in this report.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Lupesina Aoga Amata Preschool will be within two years.

Dale Bailey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

26 June 2015

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service


Glendene, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number


Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll


Gender composition

Boys 28

Girls 24

Ethnic composition







Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80% Based on funding rates


Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2


Better than minimum requirements


Over 2


Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

April 2015

Date of this report

26 June 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)


Education Review

March 2012

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.