Magic Garden Over 2's Care & Education Centre - 27/03/2015

1. Evaluation of Magic Garden Over 2's Care & Education Centre

How well placed is Magic Garden Over 2's Care & Education Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.


Magic Garden Over 2's Care & Education Centre on Auckland’s North Shore, is one of three centres in the Magic Garden complex. It continues to provide high quality care and education for children from two to three and a half years old. The well established service has been overseen by the same owner/manager and long serving teachers for many years. The centre occupies well maintained premises with very good facilities for staff. Nutritious meals are prepared on site by the centre’s cook. The owner/manager regards the three licences as a single entity in many aspects resulting in administrative and operational systems that are common across the centres.

Successive ERO reports have commented on the positive and affirming relationships among teachers, children and families. The child-centred programme nurtures children’s well being, sense of belonging and provokes children’s thinking through trusting relationships with peers and teachers. These positive factors continue to be significant features of the centre.

The centre has responded very well to the 2012 ERO report. Teachers have continued to develop their understanding of bicultural practice. The centre is forging a unique identity through a newly established kapa haka group and centre waiata developed with Māori whānau support.

The centre philosophy embraces Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum and integrates aspects of Reggio Emilia and Pikler approaches in the programme. A recently designed ‘Priorities for Learning’ document guides teaching and learning. Teachers in the over two centre have also developed their own philosophy that includes promoting discovery, respect and serenity. Managers and teachers are in the process of reviewing the philosophy to further embrace other theoretical approaches.

Most of the enrolled children transition in from the adjacent infants and toddlers centre and move on to the over three centre.

The Review Findings

Children engage in sustained play, have fun, and are enthusiastic learners. The centre is extensively resourced and has a wide variety of learning areas that invite young children to investigate and explore. Their natural creativity and curiosity are affirmed, as is their ability to lead and join in storytelling and imaginative play. Teachers encourage children to use literacy, mathematics, and science as part of their play. Children are confident, caring and trusting with adults and other children. They play and learn at a relaxed pace in an attractive, harmonious environment.

Teachers’ professional capabilities are fostered through appraisal, distributed leadership and ongoing professional development. Teachers are reflective, work collaboratively and benefit from the owner/manager’s effective professional leadership. They are dedicated and improvement focused.

Teachers plan and implement a high quality curriculum. Planning is influenced by current theories and research and is responsive to children’s interests. Children’s assessment portfolios are highly valued records of learning and development. Parents are provided with good information about the curriculum and are encouraged to contribute their ideas and aspirations for their child's learning.

Teachers understand and provide well for the special characteristics and interests of two and three year old children. Sensitive and supportive teaching practices affirm and build on the strengths children bring. Teachers acknowledge children’s cultural backgrounds and include children’s home languages in greetings and conversations. Bicultural practices and use of te reo Māori is woven through aspects of the programme. Children’s transitions through the centre are carefully managed and are responsive to individual children’s and family needs.

The owner/manager has very effective management practices, policies and procedures to inform centre operations. Self review is robust and guides decision making. Parent and community partnerships are integral to the centre. Parents have the opportunity to contribute to self review across the centre. A centre focus on community involvement and valuing families underpins centre operations.

Key Next Steps

The centre manager and ERO agreed that teachers could continue to:

  • embed practices for reflection and evaluation of their teaching on outcomes for children
  • enhance bicultural knowledge and practice.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Magic Garden Over 2's Care & Education Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Magic Garden Over 2's Care & Education Centre will be in four years.

Dale Bailey Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

27 March 2015

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2. Information about the Early Childhood Service


Northcross, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number


Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children, including up to 4 aged under 2

Service roll


Gender composition

Boys 25 Girls 20

Ethnic composition


NZ European/Pākehā




Latin American

other European








Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates


Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2


Meets minimum requirements


Over 2


Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2015

Date of this report

27 March 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

May 2012


Education Review

March 2009


Education Review

February 2006

3. General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.