Massey Playcentre

Education institution number:
22009
Service type:
Playcentre
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
36
Telephone:
Address:

5 Sunpark Place, Massey, Auckland

View on map

Massey Playcentre - 31/01/2019

1 Evaluation of Massey Playcentre

How well placed is Massey Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Massey Playcentre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Massey Playcentre operates as a parent cooperative and is licensed for 30 children, including 15 under the age of two years.

Programmes for children are underpinned by the Playcentre philosophy of parents and children playing and learning together. Massey Playcentre members recognise parents as first educators of their children. They aim to support each other to provide the best environment for children to learn and grow, and to build relationships within the community.

The centre is part of the newly established Northern North Island Playcentre Region. Regional systems support centre members to manage their centres and to provide educational programmes for their children. Playcentre personnel also provide adult education programmes for parents/whānau to achieve Playcentre qualifications.

ERO's 2015 report identified a number of areas for development including bicultural practices, integrating science into the programme, strengthening relationships with local schools and completing the outdoor environment. Centre members have responded positively and worked well towards strengthening these aspects of practice.

This review was part of a cluster of 12 reviews in the Northern North Island Playcentre region.

The Review Findings

Children lead the programme. They benefit from the provision of a rich learning environment which is spacious and well resourced, both indoors and outdoors. Easy access to resources allows children to explore new activities and experiences, and rediscover old favourites. Children are settled and engaged.

Infants and toddlers are well integrated into the daily programme. Play areas have been thoughtfully arranged with these young children in mind. All children benefit from the mixed-age setting and the opportunities for tuakana/teina relationships.

The Playcentre philosophy is well enacted. Parents are positive, supportive and responsive to children's ideas and requests. They enable children to sustain their play through the provision of resources and conversations that support play-based learning. Children have a good sense of belonging in the Playcentre environment.

Parents provide good opportunities for children to learn about the bicultural heritage of Aotearoa. Centre leaders model the use of te reo Māori in conversations with children and other adults. Some families who have English as an additional language, use their home languages during session times, maintaining and supporting children's sense of cultural identity.

Children's portfolios are good records of their participation in centre sessions and excursions. Learning stories capture their interests and strengths clearly and well. Links to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, have become more evident over time. Science is now well integrated throughout the programme.

Parents work collaboratively. They provide good role models for children's developing oral language and social competence. There is good commitment to ongoing adult education. A distributed leadership model involves centre members taking on different roles and responsibilities, ensuring the centre's sustainability.

Well aligned strategic and annual plans are guiding the centre's future direction. The purpose of internal evaluation is well understood by centre members. A robust process guides the review of relevant areas of practice and promotes positive outcomes for children.

A regional structure is replacing individual Playcentre Associations. Newly appointed regional personnel are making good progress in building on existing systems, and establishing effective regional management structures for supporting centres. Centre support workers are guided by regional support coordinators. Systems are being developed for monitoring the quality of programmes for children, adult education levels, and health and safety requirements.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders agree that key next steps for centre improvement include:

  • making the centre philosophy more specific to the centre's unique context and more aligned with the aims of current centre members

  • continuing to develop programme planning processes that promote children's more complex thinking and learning.

The Northern North Island Playcentre regional manager (acting) and support personnel agree that key next steps for the region include:

  • implementing and embedding the revised Playcentre adult education programme

  • establishing a framework to evaluate the effectiveness of centre support systems, roles and processes.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Massey Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Massey Playcentre will be in three years.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services Northern

Northern Region

31 January 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Massey, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

22009

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

34

Gender composition

Boys 19 Girls 15

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Samoan
other ethnic groups

4
18
4
8

Review team on site

November 2018

Date of this report

31 January 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

April 2015

Education Review

June 2012

Education Review

May 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Massey Playcentre - 30/04/2015

1 Evaluation of Massey Playcentre

How well placed is Massey Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Massey Playcentre is located in a quiet residential area adjacent to a park. It has been dedicated to parents and children learning together for over 50 years. The parent led cooperative offers four sessions per week to children from birth to six years old. The centre operates under the organisational umbrella of the Te Akoranga Playcentre Association. A liaison worker and other elected Association officers provide support for the centre. Association members deliver the Playcentre adult education programme to help parents/whānau build their understanding about children’s learning.

Massey Playcentre philosophy reinforces the value of parents/whānau and children learning with and alongside each other. Centre members promote the importance of developing a holistically confident child. They are aware of the need to maintain good levels of qualifications and have a high number of parents involved in training across all course levels.

The 2012 ERO report noted that children and families benefit from an inclusive and welcoming environment that supports learning opportunities for children in a mixed age setting. It also recognised that adults support children to play collaboratively and to make independent decisions about their play and social needs. These features continue to be evident throughout the centre.

Centre members have responded well to the recommendations in ERO’s 2012 report. They have explored ways to promote conversations that extend children’s learning and thinking and are continuing to strengthen documentation of children’s learning to inform programme planning and review. Centre members have addressed concerns identified in ERO’s 2012 report relating to hazards in the environment.

The Review Findings

Children at Massey Playcentre benefit from positive learning opportunities where they co-construct their learning alongside adults. Adults are skilled at providing appropriate guidance and assistance to extend children’s play. They are responsive to children’s preferences and cues and often promote tuakana/teina relationships.

Children enjoy a positive, well resourced environment. The large, natural area outdoors features established trees and grass slopes that provide many opportunities for exploration and physical challenge. This environment is complemented by the availability of the neighbouring park. Children move freely between the indoor and outdoor environments. They make good use of the spacious indoor areas and large covered deck to play with their peers.

Centre members have a very good understanding of their role as facilitators of children’s learning. They display a good knowledge of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and provide opportunities for literacy and numeracy to be integrated throughout the programme. There is an emphasis on providing children with experiences to be creative and expressive. Centre members agree that they could consider further ways for children to revisit learning through their portfolios and access to displays.

Families know each other well and provide opportunities to celebrate each others’ cultures. There is evidence of bicultural practices in the centre. Some sessions are well supported with te reo and tikangi Māori. Adults now need to continue to develop this across all sessions.

Centre members bring varied skills and knowledge to their role at the centre. There is an organisational culture that supports ongoing improvement for individuals and centre-wide systems. Adults are reflective and self review is both planned and spontaneous. Consultative processes help inform programme planning and improvements to the environment. A re-development of the entire outdoor learning environment is planned to commence this year. Adults agree to consider refining their self-review documentation in order to strengthen reflective practice.

Association management practices are well established. Good systems are in place to sustain quality practice and improve outcomes for children. A recent policy review has been completed and implemented. Centre members are encouraged to become involved in centre management and have opportunities to develop leadership skills. They are enthusiastic and committed to promoting the centre in the wider community. They uphold a child focus and endorse the importance of children’s play as essential for their holistic development.

Key Next Steps

Centre members agree that the key next steps for the centre include:
  • embedding bicultural practices across all sessions
  • implementing the next development stage of the outdoor learning environment
  • researching how to effectively integrate science into the programme
  • strengthening relationships with local schools in order to promote smooth transitions for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Massey Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Massey Playcentre will be in three years.

Dale Bailey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

30 April 2015

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Massey, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

22009

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

40

Gender composition

Boys 21

Girls 19

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Samoan

Cook Island

Indian

other European

4

20

5

2

2

7

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2015

Date of this report

30 April 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2012

 

Education Review

May 2009

 

Education Review

March 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.