BestStart Bains Avenue

Education institution number:
30073
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
18
Telephone:
Address:

7 Bains Avenue, Hamilton Central, Hamilton

View on map

Montessori @ The School House - 13/12/2017

1 Evaluation of Montessori The School House

How well placed is Montessori The School House to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Well placed with an action plan.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Montessori The School House is owned and operated by the BestStart education and care umbrella organisation. It is located in an historic house in the Hamilton suburb of Claudelands and is licensed for 40 children from two years old to school age. There are currently 43 children on the roll including eight Māori. The centre offers both sessional hours and full-day services from 8:00am to 5:00pm, Monday to Friday.

Centre leaders, the manager and head teacher, are qualified Montessori teachers. They are supported by a professional services manager (PSM) and a business manager from the BestStart organisation. Some teachers are participating in Montessori training. There are four teachers with early childhood qualifications and two support staff. BestStart provides effective governance for the service.

Children from diverse nationalities learn in two separate, age-based areas. The Bambini room caters for children from two to three years old and the Casa room for children from three to school age.

Since the 2015 ERO report there have been significant and ongoing changes to professional leadership, centre management and the teaching team. The 2015 report identified the need for improvements to the programme, assessment and planning, strategies to positively guide children's behaviour, implementing bicultural practices, enriching the outdoor environment and improving teaching interactions. Good progress has been made with children's assessment. Bicultural practices that value and respect Māori culture are now evident. Many of the remaining areas continue to need strengthening and embedding. Professional leaders have developed an action plan to address these areas with the new teaching team.

The recently reviewed philosophy aims to provide a Montessori-inspired curriculum that promotes children's independence, underpinned by a profound respect for each child, their family and the teachers.

The Review Findings

Children are learning in a calm and well-ordered indoor environment. They access good quality, age-appropriate Montessori materials. Children learn about and celebrate the cultures of the world.

Older children enjoy making choices and interacting with equipment that challenges their thinking. They benefit from respectful interactions with teachers. They are learning self-management skills and some children demonstrate high levels of independence. Early concepts of literacy, mathematics, science, cultural and sensorial experiences are shared through a systematic and sequential process at the child's own pace. Māori cultural values are evident through centre displays, respect for tikanga practices, equipment and materials and cultural celebrations such as Matariki.

A particular feature of the curriculum are the weekly walks for small groups of older children to a nearby, bush-filled gully. This has enriched the outdoor experiences for these children and resulted in close links with the local community involved in the maintenance and restoration project. One teacher has strong links to the history of this area and is supporting children and teachers to deepen their appreciation of Papatuanuku and the natural world.

Children's learning and development is well documented. Attractive individual portfolios, digital portfolios, centre displays and regular teacher summaries of learning are available. Parents share their aspirations for children's learning at formal meetings with teachers and through frequent informal conversations. A strength is the multicultural staff who are able to speak with some parents in their own languages.

Next steps for strengthening the programme are for teachers to:

  • find ways to further integrate the language, culture and identity of each child in assessment, planning and the environment

  • review centre routines to better align with best practice indicators in early child and Montessori settings.

The newly established teaching team has formed professional and collegial relationships amongst BestStart leaders, parents and whānau and staff. They work positively with specialist agencies to respond to children with additional needs. Teachers are committed to ongoing professional learning and development to support the implementation of a Montessori-inspired curriculum. ERO observed some examples of good teaching practice. However, strategies to positively manage children's behaviour need to be consistently evident in all teacher interactions with children, particularly in the Bambini room.

The newly appointed centre manager is well supported by the PSM through a planned induction process. She is setting clear direction for the re-introduction of a Montessori curriculum and models respectful practice in her interactions with children.

BestStart leaders continue to provide ongoing support for the service. A particular challenge is sustaining continuity for children and families through the many changes of staff over a number of years. The service benefits from governance support that includes:

  • up-to-date policies and frameworks to guide centre operations and meet regulatory requirements

  • comprehensive induction for new staff

  • regular visits, reporting and documented feedback from the PSM and business manager

  • relevant and regular appraisal, professional learning, development and mentoring to build teacher capability within a Montessori context

  • regular and targeted self review that leads to development and improvement.

Leaders recognise the need for ongoing improvement and have developed an action plan that aligns to the key next steps for improvement identified by ERO .

Key Next Steps

ERO identified a number of areas that need to be implemented and embedded in order to fulfil the intent of the service philosophy and improve outcomes for children. Leaders and teachers need to:

  • provide a wider range of equipment and materials, readily accessible by children, particularly in the outdoor environment

  • implement teaching practices that promote quality outcomes for children and reflect Montessori philosophy and best practice in early childhood education.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Montessori The School House completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Montessori The School House will be in three years. ERO will monitor progress in line with the action plan.

Lynda Pura-Watson

Deputy Chief Review Officer

Te Tai Miringa - Waikato / Bay of Plenty Region

13 December 2017

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Hamilton

Ministry of Education profile number

30073

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children, including up to 0 aged under 2

Service roll

43

Gender composition

Boys 23 Girls 20

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Indian
African
Other European
Chinese
Fijian
Other

8
4
8
5
5
4
3
6

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

October 2017

Date of this report

13 December 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2015

Education Review

July 2012

Education Review

May 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Montessori @ The School House - 08/06/2015

1 Evaluation of Montessori @ The School House

How well placed is Montessori @ The School House to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Montessori School house requires further development.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Montessori @ The School House is owned and operated by Kidicorp Limited. It is located in the Hamilton suburb of Claudelands and is licensed for 40 children aged from 2 to 6 years. There are currently 35 children on the roll, 6 of whom identify as Māori. The centre offers sessional hours and full day services and is open from 8.00 am to 5.00 pm Monday to Friday.

The centre follows the Montessori philosophy of independence, self management and decision-making. Scaffolded learning is promoted and encouraged through a well-prepared indoor environment. The centre operates two classrooms – the Bambini room is for children 2 to 3 years and the Pre-school room for children 3 to 6 years.

The centre has gone through a number of changes in the last year. A new centre manager has been appointed as well as a new Kidicorp professional services manager. The teaching and administration team is also predominantly new.

The children at the centre come from a diverse range of ethnic and cultural backgrounds. A high number have English as a second language. The centre celebrates the children’s cultures by honouring events such as Diwali, Chinese New Year, Matariki, Easter, Christmas and the Muslim festival Eid.

All teaching staff are either qualified Montessori teachers or progressing through their Montessori training. Most teachers are registered early childhood teachers.

The Review Findings

Children follow a programme that covers the defined areas of the Montessori curriculum including: practical life, sensorial (sensory development and refinement), language (literacy), culture (geography, botany, science, zoology etc) and mathematics. ERO observed some aspects of the Montessori approach to teaching and learning termed the “prepared environment” in the centre. Materials and activities are set out in an orderly and sequential manner. Only one of each activity is available to promote turn taking and patience. Natural and real materials such as wood and glass are used and the environment is uncluttered and features displays of classical artwork and cultural artefacts.

Teachers are at the early stages of planning a programme that compliments and enriches the learning supported by Montessori activities and equipment. ERO observed some children demonstrating high levels of:

  • independence and self management
  • literacy and numeracy knowledge
  • fine motor skills
  • concentration, resilience and sustained activity.

Staff are currently reviewing centre routines (such as morning tea and mat times) so they are more in line with Montessori philosophy and best practice.

Children and parents are formally and warmly welcomed into the centre. ERO observed respectful relationships between teachers and children. Children were generally respectful to each other and worked within their individual working spaces. Some challenging behaviours were observed and these required closer supervision and the use of better positive guidance strategies.

Generally, teachers have a good working knowledge of Montessori equipment and how to prepare the inside environment to support sequential learning and development in literacy and numeracy. Teachers use the Kidicorp on-line portal 'Story Park' to share learning stories and survey parent aspirations. Transitions into the centre are well managed with a staged approach and transitions within the centre are flexible to suit each child’s needs.

The new centre manager is strongly supported in her role to build leadership capability within her new team. Her commitment to community involvement in children’s learning has had a positive impact on the programme. Some examples are the regular conservation excursions and involvement in the local tree-planting event. In collaboration with the professional services manager, the centre manager has revised the centre’s annual plans in order to address the areas for development identified through focused self review.

Good use is made of professional development learnt through attendance at a recent Montessori conference. This experience has supported positive team building within the centre.

The centre has a shared vision underpinned by the Montessori approach to teaching and learning. They have maintained a strong connection with Montessori Aotearoa New Zealand (MANZ). The centre benefits from the management structure of the Kidicorp organisation and their systems and policies. The new management team is working hard to embed new systems to ensure an improved quality service is provided for all children.

Key Next Steps

ERO has identified a number of areas for development that are likely to have a significant impact on outcomes for children. Centre management and ERO agree that it is now necessary for the centre to plan to support teachers to continue to improve in the following areas: There is a need to:

  • plan and implement a rich Montessori-based programme that is responsive to the strengths and needs of every child
  • develop assessment processes that clearly identifies and extends children’s learning
  • track and monitor children’s learning so that teaching moments can be extended through specifically using Montessori teaching processes
  • develop a greater repertoire of positive guidance strategies particularly for children portraying more challenging behaviours
  • implement Montessori teaching practices that encourages rich oral language interaction and development
  • develop an outdoor environment that encompasses and reflects a stronger emphasis on Montessori philosophy
  • develop and implement bicultural practices that further extends knowledge and understanding across the centre programme
  • more critically reflect on practice to promote professional discussions about quality teaching and learning based on Montessori philosophy and practice.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Montessori @ The School House completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

Development Plan Recommendation

ERO recommends that the service consult with the Ministry of Education and plan to address the key next steps and actions outlined in this report.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Montessori @ The School House will be within two years.

Dale Bailey,

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern,

8 June 2015

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Hamilton

Ministry of Education profile number

30073

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children, none aged under 2

Service roll

35

Gender composition

Girls 14

Boys 21

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Asian

African

Middle Eastern

Other

6

8

7

4

4

6

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80% Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:9

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

April 2015

Date of this report

8 June 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

July 2012

 

Education Review

May 2009

 

Education Review

April 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.