Morningside Kindergarten

Education institution number:
5074
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
32
Telephone:
Address:

31 Taylors Road, Mount Albert, Auckland

View on map

Morningside Kindergarten - 10/04/2017

Here is the latest report for the Governing Organisation that this service is part of.

 

1 Evaluation of Morningside Kindergarten

How well placed is Morningside Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Morningside Kindergarten in Mount Albert, Auckland is licensed for up to 40 children from two to five years of age. Full day and sessional options are available for families and most children attend for three half or three full days.

The kindergarten philosophy emphasises children learning through play. Core values that guide Morningside Kindergarten's recently reviewed philosophy include the development of the Māori concept of manaakitanga.

Since the 2014 ERO review there have been a number of staff changes. A new head teacher was appointed at the beginning of 2017. The kindergarten team comprises a head teacher and four other registered teachers, two of whom job share, a teaching assistant, a teacher aide, and an administrator.

The kindergarten is well established and has a history of positive ERO reports. The 2014 report recognised a number of positive features, including welcoming and inclusive relationships, a commitment to bicultural practices, and good levels of literacy support. These features are still evident. Teachers have responded well to the recommendations in the last report and have explored ways to respond to children's individual interests. They have also continued to strengthen and use self review to achieve positive outcomes for children.

The kindergarten is part of the Auckland Kindergarten Association (AKA), which provides a governance and management framework and support personnel, in a range of different roles.

This review was part of a cluster of nine kindergarten reviews in the Auckland Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

Children and families are warmly welcomed into the kindergarten and have a strong sense of belonging and wellbeing. Teachers make good efforts to settle new children. Parents who spoke to ERO, value the care, nurturing and the way teachers build children's confidence in all aspects of the programme.

Children are seen as competent and capable learners. They are able to sustain imaginative play and are empowered to make decisions about their learning within a flexible routine. They are free to choose activities based on interests and preferences. Strong friendships enable children to develop social competency skills through opportunities to problem solve, share and negotiate their play.

Children are able to freely access internal and external play areas. Significant work has been done remodelling the spacious inside learning environment. This has resulted in a stimulating and inviting learning environment for children to explore and learn. The learning programme caters for children's different ages and their contributions and achievements are appropriately celebrated. The outdoor learning environment promotes appropriate challenges and a sense of risk-taking for children.

Teachers take time to listen and understand children. This supports teachers to develop a deeper knowledge of children's interests and needs. Teachers use effective practices to promote children's thinking and reasoning skills. Children are well supported when they are ready to go to school.

The kindergarten programme is broad and includes contributions from parents and whānau to extend children's experiences. A new planning format has been introduced which is being refined. Teachers plan collaboratively and are developing shared expectations about programme planning. The kindergarten is part of the Enviroschools Programme.

Children are offered good opportunities to feel proud of their cultural heritage. Teachers are engaging parents respectfully to find out more about children's different backgrounds, interests and experiences. Teachers continue to develop bicultural practices and their understandings of te ao Māori. The experienced and capable head teacher shows a commitment to strengthening bicultural practices in the kindergarten.

Parents who spoke to ERO during the review appreciate the frequent opportunities they have to talk with teachers about their child's progress and development. They value the interactive digital communication and portfolios showing their child's learning and involvement. Learning stories are starting to show the developing complexity of children's learning over time. Continuing to build learning partnerships with parents remains a focus for teachers.

The head teacher is well supported by the Auckland Kindergarten Association to continue to build the leadership capacity of the team.

Kindergarten operations are guided by a comprehensive strategic plan and a shared vision, linked to the AKA’s strategic goals. A Quality Improvement Process (QIP) also aligns with AKA and kindergarten strategic plans. It enables the AKA and teachers to monitor quality and promote ongoing improvement. The AKA continues to review its management and leadership structure. It has begun a process of internal evaluation to establish how effectively the four pillars of its strategic plan are resulting in more positive outcomes for children, their families, and the organisation.

Key Next Steps

The head teacher and teachers agree with ERO that the key next steps for the kindergarten are to continue to:

  • refine and embed new planning and evaluation processes
  • use the new structure of learning stories to show the role of the teacher more explicitly and what impact this has on an individual child's learning journey
  • build learning partnerships with parents and whānau
  • develop ways to include bicultural dimensions into kindergarten practices and documentation.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Morningside Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

 

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

 

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Morningside Kindergarten will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

10 April 2017

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationMt Albert, Auckland
Ministry of Education profile number5074
Licence typeFree Kindergarten
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for40 children, over 2 years of age
Service roll59
Gender compositionGirls 35 Boys 24
Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Pakistani

Afghani

Samoan

Chinese

Korean

Tongan

other

8

27

4

3

3

2

2

2

8

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenOver 21:10Meets minimum requirements
Review team on siteFebruary 2017
Date of this report10 April 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education ReviewFebruary 2014
Education ReviewFebruary 2011
Education ReviewNovember 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Morningside Kindergarten - 28/02/2014

1 Evaluation of Morningside Kindergarten

How well placed is Morningside Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Morningside Kindergarten is located on the grounds of Mt Albert Primary School and offers education and care for a maximum of 40 children over the age of two years. At the beginning of 2013, the kindergarten changed its operating hours to the kindergarten day model (KDM). This enables children to attend sessions that match school hours, or for mornings only. The kindergarten philosophy emphasises the importance of children learning through play, and of working collaboratively with children, parents and the wider community.

The kindergarten operates as part of the Auckland Kindergarten Association (AKA). The Association provides policy, procedural and operating guidelines. It also provides the five qualified teachers with regular, topical professional development and on-going support from a Professional Services Manager (PSM).

Teachers are supported by a teacher aide and an office administrator. The whānau support group of parents assists the kindergarten with fundraising and social events.

The kindergarten serves a culturally diverse community and enrolments include children of Pacific and Asian heritage.

Teachers have responded positively to previous ERO recommendations to further explore ways to understand parents' aspirations and respond to these goals in the kindergarten curriculum.

This review was part of a cluster of eight kindergarten reviews in the Auckland Kindergarten Association.

The Review Findings

Children settle easily to self-chosen activities when they arrive. They are warmly welcomed and have good relationships with staff. Teachers engage them in conversations about their interests and help them to further extend and develop their play. Teachers encourage children's leadership skills by providing opportunities for tuakana teina relationships where older children support and model for younger children.

The inclusive learning programme reflects teachers' stated philosophy. It is strongly influenced by Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Parent participation in the learning programme is valued and encouraged. Children's portfolios are a good record of children's involvement and interests.

The learning environment contributes to positive experiences for children. They have free access to a wide variety of learning resources indoors and outdoors. The outdoor area promotes physical activity and fosters scientific concepts. There are major renovations to the kindergarten building planned for 2014.

A feature of the kindergarten’s programme is the inclusion of the principles of environmental sustainability. Teachers are collectively participating in the Enviro-schools professional learning. They are aligning the principles of this programme with their Tiriti o Waitangi based curriculum. The development of the kindergarten’s ‘super heroes’ approach aligned to sustainability principles has motivated children's engagement with the programme.

Teachers are committed to raising children’s awareness of the bi-cultural heritage of New Zealand and to incorporating te reo Māori in the programme throughout the day. Parents report children's increasing use of te reo Māori at home. Teachers gather parents’ educational aspirations and information about children’s cultural background at enrolment and use this information to affirm children's cultural identity.

Children experience good levels of literacy support during the programme. There are many opportunities for children to read with adults and their peers and to experiment with writing when playing. The programme promotes good opportunities for creative and dramatic play. Teachers provide parents with useful information about ways to support their children when transitioning to school and teachers have good links to the school on the kindergarten’s boundary. These strategies promote effective transitions to school.

The Auckland Kindergarten Association continues to provide strong governance for kindergartens. The recent establishment of nine focus groups provides a forum for head teachers to extend their leadership skills and contribute to the ongoing development of the Association. Strengthening self review in kindergartens remains a focus for PSMs, with workshops planned to involve whole teaching teams. AKA leaders agree to explore the current appraisal process to make links between teacher reflections and positive outcomes for children more transparent.

Key Next Steps

In order to build on current good practice the PSM and teachers agree that their key next steps are to consider further ways of:

  • making children’s language, culture and identity explicit in assessment portfolios
  • responding to and extending children's interests.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Morningside Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Morningside Kindergarten will be in three years.

Dale Bailey National Manager Review Services Northern Region

28 February 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Mt Albert, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

5074

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children, including up to 0 aged under 2

Service roll

60

Gender composition

Boys 34 Girls 26

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Indian

Niue

Samoan

other Asian

other Pacific

other

4

23

8

4

4

12

3

2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

November 2013

Date of this report

28 February 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

February 2011

 

Education Review

November 2007

 

Education Review

October 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.