Nayland Primary School

Nayland Primary School

Te Ara Huarau | School Profile Report

Background

This Profile Report was written within twelve months of the Education Review Office and Nayland Primary working in Te Ara Huarau, an improvement evaluation approach used in most English Medium State and State Integrated Schools. For more information about Te Ara Huarau see ERO’s website. www.ero.govt.nz

Context 

Nayland Primary is located in Stoke, Nelson and provides education for students in Years 1 to 6. The school has established Level 2 Māori immersion provision.

Nayland Primary’s strategic priorities for improving outcomes for learners are:

  • positive progress in learning - equity and excellence

  • strong sense of identity

  • demonstrate resilience, integrity, confidence and empathy

  • successful relationships.

You can find a copy of the school’s strategic and annual plan on Nayland Primary’s website.

ERO and the school are working together to evaluate how effectively the implementation of literacy practices is providing consistency for teaching and learning across the school and supporting the accelerated progress of those learners who need it.

The rationale for selecting this evaluation is to ensure:

  • the achievement of those students who most need it, particularly Pacific students, is accelerated

  • there is consistency in teacher practice to enable students to progress through the school and ensure prior learning is built on

  • sustainability of good practice across the teaching teams, particularly for new staff.

The school expects to see continued rates of improved literacy over time. There will be a shared understanding and clear expectations for a balanced literacy programme that is consistently applied across the school.

Strengths

The school can draw from the following strengths to support its goal to evaluate how effectively the implementation of literacy practices is providing consistency for teaching and learning across the school and supporting the accelerated progress of those learners who need it:

  • well-established support systems led by knowledgeable and collaborative leaders

  • rigorous expectations and structures for knowing about children’s learning strengths and needs

  • well-thought-out programmes, practices and resources for teachers, students and families to promote best practice and strengthen learning partnerships.

Where to next?

Moving forward, the school will prioritise:

  • supporting teacher development through targeted professional learning and development to build capacity, provide clear expectations and consistency of practice across the school

  • identifying priority students and putting in place systems to accelerate their progress with regular monitoring and evaluation of teaching and learning.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. ERO will support the school in reporting their progress to the community. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

7 June 2023 

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.  educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Nayland Primary School

Board Assurance with Regulatory and Legislative Requirements Report 2022 to 2025

As of November 2022, the Nayland Primary School, School Board has attested to the following regulatory and legislative requirements:

Board Administration

Yes

Curriculum

Yes

Management of Health, Safety and Welfare

Yes

Personnel Management

Yes

Finance

Yes

Assets

Yes

Further Information

For further information please contact Nayland Primary School, School Board.

The next School Board assurance that it is meeting regulatory and legislative requirements will be reported, along with the Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report, within three years.

Information on ERO’s role and process in this review can be found on the Education Review Office website.

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

7 June 2023 

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Nayland Primary School

Provision for International Students Report

Background

The Education Review Office reviews schools that are signatories to the Education (Pastoral Care of Tertiary and International Learners) Code of Practice 2021 established under section 534 of the Education and Training Act 2020.

Findings

The Nayland Primary School has attested that it complies with all aspects of the Code. No international students were enrolled at the time of the ERO review.

Clearly defined roles and responsibilities ensure that provision for supporting international students is well understood. Detailed policies and procedures provide parents and students with detailed information about the school and expectations for their learning and wellbeing.

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

7 June 2023 

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Nayland Primary School - 25/11/2019

School Context

Nayland Primary School is situated in the Nayland suburb of Nelson. It caters for students in Years 1 to 6. The roll of 421 students includes 16% Māori and 4% Pacific.

The school’s overarching vision is for ‘confident learners, connected community, achieving brilliance and kia kaha’.

The school’s strategic goals focus on:

  • a responsive curriculum underpinned by relationship-based learning and effective teaching
  • educationally powerful connections and relationships with its community
  • assessment for learning, evaluation, inquiry, knowledge building and innovation to support learning
  • strong peer-to-peer interactions.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, schoolwide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • achievement in reading, writing and mathematics
  • achievement and progress for priority learners
  • wellbeing.

Teachers have participated in the Ministry of Education funded Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L), Accelerated Learning in Mathematics (ALiM) and the Accelerated Learning in Literacy (ALL) professional learning and support programmes.

The school has achieved the Green Gold EnviroSchools award. It is an active member and contributes to the leadership of Te Kāhui Ako o Omaio ki Tahunanui (Community of Learning).

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

The school is effective in achieving excellent and equitable outcomes for many students. The overall achievement information reported by the school for 2018 shows that nearly all children were achieving school expectations within The New Zealand Curriculum (NZC) levels in reading, and most in mathematics and writing. Māori students’ overall achievement is similar to that of their peers within the school.

Leaders are taking steps to address an ongoing difference for boys in literacy, who are achieving much lower when compared to girls.

Students with additional needs are making good progress towards individual achievement goals.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

The school is developing its effectiveness in accelerating the learning for those students who need it.

School collated learning information shows that, of the students whose learning is targeted for improvement, many make expected progress, and some make accelerated progress. School leaders are aware of the need to increase the effectiveness of the school’s response to students who need to accelerate their learning.

Established interventions that withdraw children from their classrooms for additional support are showing a positive impact on increasing rates of progress for those who need it.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Positive relationships are clearly evident across the school. Students are highly engaged and enthusiastic participants in their learning. Effective and deliberate teaching strategies are designed to respond to students’ needs. Purposeful and authentic learning tasks are evident. Students understand the purpose of learning and are empowered to make choices and decisions about its direction. They have a range of opportunities to develop their leadership capabilities.

Leaders and teachers identify students who are at risk of underachievement, and respond through a range of programmes and initiatives. Students with high, complex and additional needs are well catered for. External agencies and expertise are accessed as appropriate after consultation with families.

Leaders and teachers have built effective learning-focused relationships with students, parents, whānau and the community. Parents are actively involved in supporting a range of school events and activities. Kāhui Ako learning community initiatives have the potential to show a positive impact for students.

Teachers are well supported to improve their effectiveness through a robust appraisal process. Teacher inquiry focuses appropriately on lifting outcomes for priority learners. A well-considered induction and mentoring programme supports new and beginning teachers. Professional learning is responsive to teachers’ needs and is suitably aligned to the Kāhui Ako and the school’s strategic priorities for improvement.

Senior leaders are collaborative and work cohesively to enact the school’s vision and strategic priorities for improvement. They have successfully developed a positive environment that is conducive to learning. Teachers across the school have opportunities to develop their leadership capacity. Student and parent voice is increasingly valued and used to inform decision making. Organisational systems and processes are coherently aligned to whole school and Kāhui Ako strategic goals.

A range of useful assessment tools supports teachers to make overall judgements in relation to expected NZC curriculum level performance. Collated learning information is well analysed to show achievement, progress and accelerated progress for individuals and groups in reading, writing and mathematics. School-developed matrices are used well to plan and assess student progress in other learning areas. Reports of children’s achievement and progress to their parents have been improved. Leaders are taking steps to develop a process to ensure the accuracy and dependability of teachers’ judgements through moderation within the school.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Leaders and teachers should further develop a shared understanding and capability in evidenced-based internal evaluation. This will enable them to better determine the impact and worth of strategies and interventions on improving outcomes for students.

The school should continue to further develop and strengthen the localised school curriculum. Future reviews, involving whānau, families and the community, should consider how well it:

  • is meaningful and relevant

  • reflects local history, whakapapa, stories, context and places of significance

  • responds to students’ culture, language and identity

  • meets the school’s bicultural and Treaty of Waitangi obligations

  • includes shared expectations of effective teacher practice

  • responds to the needs and accelerates learning for priority students

  • implements the values and strategies of PB4L consistently across the school.

3 Other Matters

Provision for international students

The school is a signatory to the Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students (the code) established under section 238f of the Education Act 1989.

The school has attested that it complies with and meets all aspects of the code. At the time of this review there was one international student.

4 Board Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration and certification
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.

5 ERO’s Overall Judgement

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO’s overall evaluation judgement of Nayland Primary School’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Well placed.

ERO’s Framework: Overall Findings and Judgement Tool derived from School Evaluation Indicators: Effective Practice for Improvement and Learner Success is available on ERO’s website.

6 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • sustained high levels of achievement
  • positive, learning-focused relationships with students, families and the community
  • cohesive and collaborative leadership that enacts the school vision and develops good conditions for learning
  • effective processes that support teachers to improve their practice.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are in:

  • further developing a shared understanding and capability in evidenced-based internal evaluation to determine the impact of actions on improving outcomes
  • continuing to review the localised curriculum to strengthen how well it responds to context and children’s cultural needs, and accelerates the progress of priority learners.

Actions for compliance

During the onsite stage of the review, ERO identified non-compliance in relation to the school’s policies and procedures.

In order to address this, the board of trustees must:

Review and develop a range of policies that better support children’s physical and emotional safety and align with the requirements of current legislation, particularly the Children’s Act (2014) and the Health and Safety at Work Act (2015).

The developed policies need to be fully reviewed and updated every three years (or sooner if appropriate). Compliance with these policies should be regularly reported to the board.

Since the onsite stage of the review, the school has responded promptly to address these areas of non-compliance.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Director Review and Improvement Services Te Tai Tini

Southern Region

25 November 2019

About the school

Location

Nelson

Ministry of Education profile number

3208

School type

Contributing Primary School (Years 1-6)

School roll

421

Gender composition

51% Male, 49% Female

Ethnic composition

Māori 16%

NZ European/Pākehā 66%

Asian 6%

Pacific 4%

Other ethnic groups 8%

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

Yes

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

September 2019

Date of this report

25 November 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review August 2015

Education Review March 2012

Nayland Primary School - 20/08/2015

Findings

School priorities are student centred and focused on positive learning and wellbeing outcomes. The curriculum effectively engages students in learning. Parent involvement is actively supported and encouraged. Teachers are very aware of, and increasingly responsive to students’ home cultures. Students’ voice is valued. Next steps include building students ongoing independence in managing their learning.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

1 Context

What are the important features of this school that have an impact on student learning?

The board, leaders and staff have successfully retained, and in many instances built on, the strengths identified in the previous report. For instance, relationships and partnerships with other schools have been further strengthened with a greater focus on professional collaboration and student wellbeing.

A key feature of the school is the shared vision and values that are being increasingly used to determine the school’s future direction.

The board has made purposeful and innovative use of buildings to provide increased opportunities to meet as a whole school, support school related groups, and to provide additional learning spaces.

There is a collective approach to following the principles of maintaining and working towards a more sustainable environment. This is evident in the visually attractive presentation and care of the school grounds and through the school’s curriculum.

The school’s progress towards addressing the recommendation in the 2012 ERO report is evident in the robust way student learning and wellbeing information is being managed and shared by teachers and leaders.

The board actively supports parent involvement in the school. Its well-considered focus on resources strongly supports more inclusive learning opportunities for students.

2 Learning

How well does this school use achievement information to make positive changes to learners’ engagement, progress and achievement?

The school makes increasingly effective use of student information to promote engagement and progress, particularly for those at risk of not achieving.

Leaders and teachers have developed clear guidelines for making more consistent National Standards judgements about students learning in reading, writing and mathematics. This is enabling teachers to identify those students who are not achieving at expectations and to put plans in place to improve their progress.

Syndicate teams regularly review the actions teachers are taking to raise achievement for all students who are below the National Standards. Teachers change learning programmes based on this review. They share ideas and discuss other strategies likely to make a difference. Information is shared with senior leaders who contribute their thoughts and provide additional readings and useful resources.

Teachers also closely monitor and reflect on their practice to better meet the needs of specific focus students in each class. They actively seek students’ views about their learning and have increased parent-school communication to raise students’ learning outcomes. Early results indicate that this approach is effective in accelerating student progress.

Senior leaders consult with teachers about the usefulness of student assessment processes. They make appropriate use of this information to refine practices and inform professional development decisions.

A Ministry of Education supported intervention programme for writing has made a considerable difference to a small group of students’ progress and achievement. The board has made available funding for additional groups of students to take part in the programme.

Teachers make well-considered, suitable provision for students with special needs. A useful register helps provide a school-wide view of needs and provision. It enables many student needs to be met within the classroom. Trustees show commitment to special needs provision through additional resourcing.

Students are aware of their learning goals. They know what they are working towards.

Areas for review and development

Senior leaders recognise a need to improve the clarity of planning and reporting annual student achievement targets to ensure student progress and achievement is recognised, celebrated and improved.

Leaders are investigating ways to ensure teachers’ National Standards judgements for reading, writing and mathematics are consistent with those from other education providers. ERO agrees this is an important next step.

3 Curriculum

How effectively does this school’s curriculum promote and support student learning?

The school’s curriculum effectively engages students in learning and is helping to promote their progress and achievement. The shift in achievement is most evident in reading and mathematics where overall achievement is very good. The school is currently focused on lifting students’ progress in writing.

Teachers provide students with a well-balanced and responsive curriculum that successfully integrates key aspects of the New Zealand Curriculum. Leaders and staff are well-supported in planning for students by clear expectations and guidelines for effective teaching practice.

Features of the school’s curriculum include the way teachers are:

  • making meaningful connections to students experiences by including authentic and rich learning contexts in planned programmes

  • increasing the effective use of digital technologies, and other good quality resources, to motivate and engage students in their learning

  • encouraging and promoting opportunities for students to work independently in groups and consolidate new learning

  • actively using students' and parents' views to make decisions about curriculum development and teaching practice.

There has been a deliberate and planned approach by senior leaders to ensure staff has a good working knowledge and understanding about being appropriately responsive to students’ home cultures. Teachers are more effectively engaging with students and their families to further support learning at home and in the classroom. The school’s inclusive culture is contributing to cultural symbols and language becoming more visible in the environment and students developing a stronger sense of belonging.

Areas for review and development

The board and senior leaders agree the next steps to further improve and increase student ownership of their learning is to:

  • support students to become more independent in making decisions about their learning goals, progress and recognising their own levels of achievement

  • make the school’s approach to integrated studies more explicit to students so they can become increasingly confident as self-managing learners.

How effectively does the school promote educational success for Māori, as Māori?

The school is effectively promoting education success for Māori as Māori.

The school has successfully gathered parents of Māori students’ aspirations for their children to succeed as Māori. This is now being used to:

  • provide direction to school leaders and staff about ways the school can increase the use of language and culture within the curriculum

  • enable leaders to provide better support for whānau to help their children’s learning at home, particularly with te reo and tikanga Māori.

Whānau participation in the school whānau group has increased and there is strong support from the principal to ensure the momentum is sustained. The development of the Tātaiako Plan clearly identifies key actions the school will implement to ensure teachers will encourage and promote educational success for Māori students, as Māori.

Recent initiatives to closely monitor and track the progress and achievement of students are likely to improve outcomes for Māori students.

4 Sustainable Performance

How well placed is the school to sustain and improve its performance?

The school is well placed to continue sustaining and improving its performance. The board and staff work well together. School priorities are clear with appropriate strategic goals that are student centred and focused on positive learning and wellbeing outcomes.

Trustees receive regular informative reports on students’ progress towards meeting the boards’ annual achievement targets. School leaders ensure professional development is well linked to the focus of these targets to accelerate student achievement.

The board are well informed and this is supporting them to be effective in their governance role. A significant feature of the school is the way the board seeks other perspectives and external advice to inform decision-making.

The principal and senior leadership work collaboratively. They have established common goals and a shared understanding about the future direction of the school. They recognise and make good use of individual strengths. The board is strategic in its appointment processes and management of staff. Student needs are the basis of decision-making.

The school has developed strong connections with parents, regularly seeking their views and communicating with them about what is happening at school and ways to support students’ learning.

Senior leaders promote a positive, collaborative team culture amongst staff. Robust discussions are encouraged to promote new ideas and ways of thinking about education and student learning. Self review shows that a high percentage of students have positive relationships with their teachers and know teachers care about their learning and wellbeing.

The principal effectively builds the leadership capacity of staff, providing useful professional development and mentoring of staff. Performance management systems also support teachers to strengthen their practice.

Areas for review and development

The board, leaders and teachers would benefit from strengthening the evaluative aspect of self reviews including:

  • the board’s review its own performance and governance action plans

  • use of analysed student achievement data and feedback in curriculum and syndicate reviews.

Provision for international students

The school is a signatory to the Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students (the Code) established under section 238F of the Education Act 1989. The school has attested that it complies with all aspects of the Code.

At the time of this review there was an international student attending the school and since the previous 2012 ERO report several international students have attended.

Students receive appropriate pastoral care with regular contact with parents. Provision for extra learning support is in place, especially for English language development.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration

  • curriculum

  • management of health, safety and welfare

  • personnel management

  • financial management

  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)

  • physical safety of students

  • teacher registration

  • processes for appointing staff

  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions

  • attendance.

Conclusion

School priorities are student centred and focused on positive learning and wellbeing outcomes. The curriculum effectively engages students in learning. Parent involvement is actively supported and encouraged. Teachers are very aware of, and increasingly responsive to students’ home cultures. Students’ voice is valued. Next steps include building students ongoing independence in managing their learning.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Chris Rowe
Deputy Chief Review Officer Southern (Acting) 

About the School

Location

Nelson

Ministry of Education profile number

3208

School type

Contributing (Years 1 to 6)

School roll

445

Number of international students

1

Gender composition

Boys 50%, Girls 50%

Ethnic composition

Pākehā
Māori
Asian
Pacific

80%
14%
  4%
  2%

Review team on site

June 2015

Date of this report

20 August 2015

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review
Education Review
Education Review

March 2012
December 2008
November 2005