Oasis Preschool Mapua

Education institution number:
65138
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
39
Address:

2 Toru Street, Mapua

View on map

Oasis Preschool Mapua

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Oasis Preschool Mapua are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whakaū Embedding

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 

Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whakaū Embedding

Whakaū Embedding

2 Context of the Service

Oasis Preschool Mapua is one of three privately-owned services in the Tasman area. Two separate learning areas cater for children from aged six months until they start primary school. Two team leaders are supported by the centre owners and an evaluation and policy manager. A small number of Māori children attend the service.

3 Summary of findings

Children are empowered as capable and independent learners. The inclusive, rich curriculum is underpinned by Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and the service philosophy and learning priorities. Infants and toddlers experience a calm, slow pace that gives them space and time to lead their own learning. Kaiako know children well and are responsive to their non-verbal cues, gestures, and emerging language.

Assessment information is informative and highlights children’s learning and progress over time. Kaiako work in partnership with their whānau to design and implement a curriculum that encourages resilience and exploration. Children’s interests form the basis of the planning which is guided by the learning outcomes in Te Whāriki. A next step is for kaiako to evaluate in greater depth children’s developing capabilities in relation to the learning outcomes from Te Whāriki.

Te reo Māori me ngā tikanga Māori are woven into the daily teaching practice and the curriculum which reflects the bicultural heritage of Aotearoa. Leaders and kaiako are committed to enacting Te Tiriti o Waitangi principles in everyday practice and deepening their understanding. Leaders and kaiako recognise the importance of continuing to build their knowledge and skills in delivering a consistently rich bicultural curriculum that reflects local iwi and hapū perspectives.

Effective mentoring and coaching are provided by leaders. They collaborate with kaiako to set a clear vision and curriculum expectations for the service. Well-considered professional learning develops kaiako leadership capability to provide a responsive curriculum. 

Strong evaluation leadership and collective capability promote a culture of reflection and learning. Internal evaluation is well used in key operational processes and practices to support ongoing improvement and positive outcomes for children. 

4 Improvement actions

Oasis Preschool Mapua will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • consider a deeper focus on children’s increasing capabilities in relation to the learning outcomes and use this information to show evidence of equitable and excellent outcomes for children

  • continue to extend kaiako knowledge and use of te reo Māori me ngā tikanga Māori in ways that are meaningful to children

  • build an understanding of local iwi and hapū knowledge and narratives to inform the local curriculum.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Oasis Preschool Mapua completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management, and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

16 November 2022 

6 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Oasis Preschool Mapua

Profile Number 

65138

Location

Mapua

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

42 children, including up to 20 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

43

Review team on site

September 2022

Date of this report

16 November 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, February 2019; Education Review, May 2017

Oasis Preschool Mapua - 19/02/2019

1 Evaluation of Oasis Preschool Mapua

How well placed is Oasis Preschool Mapua to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Oasis Preschool Mapua is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Oasis Preschool Mapua is one of four centres owned and managed by Oasis Preschools. The service's vision is to empower and support children on life's journey as individuals and is based on Christian values. Three of the centres are based in Motueka and one in Mapua. Oasis Preschool Mapua provides education and care for up to 42 children aged from six months to school age. There are two separate indoor areas. One is for infants and toddlers, and the other area provides for the older children. Infants, toddlers and older children share the outside play area.

Since the May 2017 ERO review the staffing has remained constant, with one new staff member. The majority of staff are fully qualified early childhood teachers. The service uses regular relieving staff to provide consistency and familiarity for children's wellbeing and learning.

The service has an overarching management team which oversees management responsibilities and provides advice and support to each individual centre. A team leader is responsible for the day to day operation of the centre.

The May 2017 ERO report identified a need to improve management and evaluation systems. The roles and responsibilities of the managers have been reviewed, clarified and strengthened. The managers and teaching team have made significant progress in addressing the areas identified in that report.

This review was part of a cluster of four reviews in the Oasis Preschools.

The Review Findings

Managers have worked with teachers to clearly identify and document the priorities for children's learning across their service. These priorities promote children to be great communicators, respectful and caring, confident learners, and proud of their identity. Teachers at the centre have also identified priorities specific for the particular needs, strengths and abilities of children who attend this centre. These include an emphasis on promoting children's sense of belonging, their independence and developing confidence.

The priorities that teachers have identified for individual and group learning are well enacted in the curriculum, planning and centre documentation. Teachers particularly notice children's learning dispositions.

Children experience a curriculum where:

  • there is a strong emphasis on responsive and nurturing relationships between children and teachers and positive relationships between children; teachers ensure infants and toddlers have unhurried and regular one-to-one interactions with familiar adults so they and their families can build secure relationships
  • teachers make purposeful resourcing decisions and have intentional interactions based on children's interests and individual learning priorities, alongside useful feedback from the curriculum advisor
  • there is a flexible, yet well planned and personalised approach to supporting children and their families as they transition into, through and out of the centre to school.

Teachers respect and value partnerships with parents. They promote positive relationships with parents and whānau and implement an effective range of systems and strategies to support parents to contribute to assessment, curriculum decisions and internal evaluation.

Managers have significantly increased the understanding and use of systems for evaluation to ensure accountability across all aspects of the service and centre's practices. A useful and robust evaluation framework is supporting leaders and teachers to focus more on outcomes for children. Managers and teachers now more systematically pose questions about the quality of their practices, gather evidence and make sense of this evidence to improve teaching and learning. This is supporting deeper levels of reflective practice and building an improvement-focused culture.

Managers and teachers now reliably know the next steps to improve teaching and learning and have sufficient planning in place to address these.

Recent internal evaluations have led to:

  • strengthened assessment and planning practices with a clearer process, more focus on intentional teaching and a greater emphasis on collaborative planning.
  • teachers strengthening the bicultural curriculum through increasing the visibility and use of te reo and tikanga Māori across the centre

Managers have successfully supported emergent leadership and built capability through:

  • well targeted internal and external professional learning and development and useful coaching
  • strategic use of teacher strengths
  • promoting greater collaboration between teachers within the centre, between centres, and with the management team.

Since the May 2017 ERO review, managers have developed a more comprehensive appraisal system. Teachers are taking collaborative approaches to supporting the development of their teaching practices and engage in regular discussions about professional teaching standards. There is obvious alignment between appraisal and other systems that focus on improving outcomes for children.

Key Next Steps

The overall Oasis Preschools service and Oasis Preschool Mapua have made considerable changes to systems and practices in a short period of time to improve outcomes for children. They are still working on consistently embedding some aspects of these changes.

ERO, the managers and centre leader agree that the key next steps for the centre and service are to continue to strengthen:

  • aspects of planning and assessment
  • aspects of appraisal practices
  • the visibility of the service's recently identified priorities for children's learning in planning and evaluation practices
  • the strategic plan so that it becomes a more useful and used document for guiding and supporting service improvement
  • managers' and teachers' knowledge and use of ways to support Māori children's success as Māori.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Oasis Preschool Mapua completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist.  In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Oasis Preschool Mapua will be in three years.

Alan Wynyard
Director Review and Improvement Services
Southern Region

19 February 2019 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Mapua

Ministry of Education profile number

65138

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

42 children, including up to 20 aged under 2

Service roll

40

Gender composition

24 Boys ; Girls 16

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other ethnicities

  2
34
  4

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:7

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

December 2018

Date of this report

19 February 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

May 2017

Education Review

October 2012

Education Review

December 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.