Opotiki Community Childcare Centre

Education institution number:
40069
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
65
Telephone:
Address:

115 Wellington Street, Opotiki

View on map

Opotiki Community Childcare Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non‑compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Opotiki Community Childcare Centre is a not-for-profit centre governed by a committee of parents and kaiako. A centre manager and head teacher share responsibility for management and lead the teaching team. More than half of the children enrolled are Māori.

Summary of Review Findings

Children are involved in decisions about their learning experiences. Their learning is enhanced by teachers engaging in meaningful and positive interactions with them. The curriculum is language rich, inclusive, and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Children are responded to as confident and competent learners and are supported to develop their social competence.

Assessment, planning, and evaluation demonstrates an understanding of children’s interests and whānau. There are regular opportunities for parents to communicate with kaiako about their child’s learning.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • continue to increase the range of information about the cultural contexts in which children live within assessment and planning documentation

  • increase access to a range of resources throughout the day, for older children to revisit and extend the complexity of their learning.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliance:

  • a documented process for providing positive guidance.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, C10]

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

18 October 2022

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Opotiki Community Childcare Centre

Profile Number

40069

Location

Opotiki

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

70 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

71

Review team on site

September 2022

Date of this report

18 October 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Akanuku | Assurance Review, January 2021; Education Review, September 2018

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Opotiki Community Childcare Centre - 27/01/2021

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Not meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified non-compliance with regulatory standards that must be addressed.

Background

Opotiki Community Childcare Centre is a not-for-profit centre, governed by a committee of parents and teachers, past and present. The September 2018 ERO report identified areas where the service was not compliant with regulatory standards.

Summary of Review Findings

Children engage in positive interactions with adults. They have opportunities to learn about the dual cultural heritage of Aotearoa New Zealand. Teachers respect and support the right of each child to be confident in their own culture.

Effective governance and management systems that support staff to grow their knowledge and understanding of the licensing criteria have not been established. Increased monitoring of health and safety practices is required.

Actions for Compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • evidence that the building has a current Fire Evacuation Scheme approved by Fire and Emergency New Zealand
  • checking equipment, premises and facilities on every day of operation for hazards to children so these are eliminated, isolated or minimised, including children’s access to hazardous materials and electrical appliances.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS4, HS12).

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • provision of a tempering valve or other accurate means of limiting hot water temperature is installed for the requirements of criterion HS13 to be met (PF24)
  • areas of glass accessible to children are either made of safety glass, covered by an adhesive film or effectively guarded by barriers (PF7)
  • maintaining medication records that include evidence of parental acknowledgement of medicine administered to children (HS28)
  • providing outdoor activity space that is enclosed by structures and/or fences and gates designed to ensure that children are not able to leave the premises without the knowledge of adults providing education and care (PF13).

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends the Ministry follows up with the service provider to ensure that non-compliances identified in this report are addressed promptly.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Phil Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services

Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

27 January 2021

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Opotiki Community Childcare Centre

Profile Number

40069

Location

Ōpōtiki

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

70 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%+

Service roll

81

Ethnic composition

Māori 55
NZ European/Pākehā 16
other ethnic groups 10

Review team on site

December 2020

Date of this report

27 January 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review, September 2018; Education Review, June 2015.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.