Papatawa School

Papatawa School - 16/12/2020

Findings

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO ‘s overall evaluation judgement of Papatawa School’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Developing.

1 Background and Context

What is the background and context for this school’s review?

Papatawa School is located in rural Woodville. It caters for students from Years 1 to 8. Of the 26 students attending the school, 50% identify as Māori.

Since the June 2018 ERO report, staffing has remained stable. Some experienced trustees provide continuity for the board of trustees.

The previous report identified several areas for improvement. Over the past two years the school has participated in an ongoing ERO evaluation process to support improvement. The principal and board have received ongoing support from the Ministry of Education (the Ministry) to bring about the changes required.

The school is part of the Tararua Kāhui Ako.

2 Review and Development

How effectively is the school addressing its priorities for review and development?

Priorities identified for review and development

The overall goal was to enhance board capability for effective stewardship and strengthen principal leadership for high quality teaching and learning. Areas of focus to support this have included:

  • strengthening assessment practices and establishing reliable assessment information and raising levels of achievement

  • developing a local curriculum to guide teaching practice and to support all students

  • implementing an appraisal system to support teachers’ professional growth and development

  • building effective internal evaluation to know the impact of initiatives and inform decision making

  • ensuring that trustees are appropriately trained and informed about their stewardship role to build their capability.

Progress

There are well developed systems and processes to track, monitor and report the progress and achievement of all students. These have been further refined to ensure more targeted planning for students’ learning, responsive to their needs. Achievement targets for literacy and mathematics are appropriately focused on the students whose learning requires acceleration.

Appropriate assessment tools support teachers to make judgements about student progress and learning in literacy and mathematics. Teachers are highly collaborative and inquire into data to identify what is working, not working, who for and why. The recent implementation of the Progress and Consistency Tool (PaCT) is further strengthening teachers’ overall judgements of student achievement.

The 2019 end-of-year achievement data indicated that most students, including Māori, achieved at and above expectation in reading and writing, with large a majority in mathematics. A positive shift in levels of achievement in reading and writing was evident for all groups. Māori learners and non-Māori achieved similarly.

The mid-year 2020 achievement data indicates a continued trajectory of improvement. Most students including Māori, are achieving at and above expectation in reading, a large majority in writing and most in mathematics. Māori learners continue to achieve as well as non-Māori.

Disparity for boys remains in literacy and mathematics. This is reducing over time. There is evidence of acceleration for some students in reading.

A responsive coherent curriculum has been developed in consultation with students, parents and whānau. There is clear alignment to The New Zealand Curriculum principles, values and key competencies. Guidelines for effective teaching, learning and assessment have been developed. These include provision for second language learning and career education for Years 7 and 8. The principal identifies that the curriculum requires further development to strengthen responsiveness to the local context. This is being progressed through the principal’s engagement in a professional learning group.

A learning-through-play approach is being implemented across the school. This is informed by research and ongoing professional learning and development. This approach is responsive to the strengths and interests of students, provides them with choice and promotes self-management skills and collaboration. The school identifies that more work is required to fully integrate this approach with the key competencies and school values.

Staff know students well and are collectively responsible for all learners. Respectful, reciprocal relationships across the school promote students’ wellbeing and engagement in learning. The implementation of learning pathways for all students in writing, supports students to take increased ownership of their learning.

The school uses a range of strategies to engage with and consult whānau Māori. They are regularly informed about school operation and student achievement. Staff are responsive and maximise opportunities to engage with whānau face-to-face. This supports the development of learning partnerships. The school continues to seek opportunities to engage with Iwi through the Kāhui Ako.

An appropriate performance appraisal process, focused on inquiry and improvement, is in place for the principal and staff.

Through ongoing training, trustees have strengthened their understanding of the governance role, including policy and procedure. They are well informed about school operation, the curriculum and student achievement. A board work plan supports it to meet statutory requirements. All areas of non-compliance identified in the previous report have been addressed.

3 Sustainable performance and self review

How well placed is the school to sustain and continue to improve and review its performance?

The school has improved its capacity to sustain and review its performance. The principal, staff and board have worked collaboratively to address the areas requiring development identified in the previous report. There has been a deliberate focus on developing a coherent localised curriculum and improving systems, processes and practices to raise student achievement.

Continued involvement in professional learning and development effectively supports leaders and teachers to enhance learning outcomes for students.

There is a well established process for internal evaluation. Teachers are highly collaborative and use inquiry effectively to evaluate the impact of new initiatives to promote positive learning and wellbeing outcomes for students.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.

Conclusion

Significant progress has been made since the 2018 ERO report. A coherent curriculum guides teaching and learning and is responsive to the strengths and interests of students. Staff are highly collaborative and a collective responsibility for all learners is evident. Achievement information shows a positive trajectory of improvement. There is a well established process for internal evaluation.

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO ‘s overall evaluation judgement of Papatawa School’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Developing.

ERO’s Framework: Overall Findings and Judgement Tool derived from School Evaluation Indicators: Effective Practice for Improvement and Learner Success is available on ERO’s website.

Phil Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)

Central Region - Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

16 December 2020

About the school

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.

Papatawa School - 25/06/2018

School Context

Papatawa School, located in rural Woodville, has 28 students in Years 1 to 8. Of the learners enrolled, 11 identify as Māori. Since the May 2015 ERO report, the roll has decreased.

The school’s stated R.E.A.C.H. values are respect, excellence, attitude, caring and honesty. These support the focus on the pastoral care of students.

The school’s strategic aim is for every student to be fully engaged in a varied and relevant curriculum that prepares them as life-long learners. Achievement targets are set for groups of children in reading, writing and mathematics.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, schoolwide information about outcomes for students in achievement in reading, writing and mathematics.

In 2017, a new principal and principal release teacher were appointed.

The school belongs to the Tararua Kāhui Ako.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

The school’s reported achievement data, since 2015, indicates that the majority of students achieve at or above the school’s expectations in reading, writing and mathematics.

Data provided by the school shows there is growing disparity for boys and Māori in reading and writing.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

The school does not report acceleration of learning for students. Māori students are identified, however their progress is not well known.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Staff have programmes that are designed to positively impact on students’ wellbeing and learning. Positive classroom tone is evident. Reading, writing and mathematics are appropriately the school’s priority learning areas.

Leaders and teachers recognise the importance of student and community voice to inform decision making.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Managing ongoing improvement and change in a systematic and strategic way has not been sustained since the May 2015 ERO report.

Student progress and achievement needs to be the focus of: the board in their stewardship role; the principal in her leadership capacity; and staff in their teaching roles. It is essential that careful selection and use of assessment tools, robust moderation and ongoing monitoring of all students’ progress and achievement are implemented to accelerate outcomes for learners. Ensuring reliability of assessment data is a key and needed development.

Review of the school’s documented curriculum should be undertaken as soon as possible so that it is in line with The New Zealand Curriculum and informs teaching and learning. Contexts for learning should intentionally support a bicultural curriculum and deliberately encourage Māori learners as Māori.

A useful and robust process to support the school leader’s and teachers’ professional growth and ongoing learning is not in place. Trustees, leaders and staff should seek assistance to understand the importance of appraisal in developing high quality teaching practice and how to go about this process. An appraisal system that is appropriate and meets legislative requirements needs to be established and used.

Further developing a shared understanding and use of internal evaluation is essential to enable trustees and staff to determine the effectiveness of teaching practices, learning interventions and school operation on student outcomes.

3 Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration and certification
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

Appraisal audit

Teachers have not been regularly appraised in recent years, as required by the Education Council.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified non-compliance in relation to policy and procedure development. Many key policies are not developed or out of date.

In order to address this, the board of trustees must:

  1. develop a local curriculum to guide teaching practice and include second language learning and career education for Years 7 and 8 [National Administration Guideline 1]

  2. develop a policy and procedures related to police vetting [Part 3 Vulnerable Children’s Act 2014]

  3. in consultation with the school’s Māori community, develop and make known to the school’s community policies, plans and targets for improving the progress and achievement of Māori students
    [National Administration Guideline 1e]

  4. review procedures related to board minutes to ensure private matters are recorded in-committee rather than in the public domain
    [Section 48, Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987]

  5. ensure teachers and the principal are appraised and the board receives reports at least once a year to confirm the procedures are being implemented. [Part 31 Education Act 1989]

The school is updating its internet safety policy.

4 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • an appropriate focus on reading, writing and mathematics that supports students’ learning.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are in:

  • establishing reliable assessment information and improving outcomes for students to achieve equity for all groups in the school and raise levels of achievement overall
  • developing a local curriculum to guide teaching practice and to support all students
  • rigorous implementation of an appraisal system to support teachers’ professional growth and ongoing learning
  • building effective internal evaluation to know the impact of initiatives in improving equity and excellence for all learners, and to inform decision making
  • ensuring that trustees are appropriately trained and informed about their stewardship role to build their capability.

Recommendations to other agencies

ERO recommends that the Secretary for Education consider intervention under Part 7A of the Education Act 1989 in order to bring about improvement in relation to the next steps identified in this report.

ERO’s next external evaluation process and timing

ERO intends to carry out a process of ongoing external evaluation to support development over the course of one-to-two years.

Patricia Davey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

25 June 2018

About the school

Location

Woodville

Ministry of Education profile number

2640

School type

Full Primary (Years 1 to 8)

School roll

28

Gender composition

Male 20, Female 8

Ethnic composition

Māori 11

Pākehā 16

Other ethnic groups 1

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

No

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

May 2018

Date of this report

25 June 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review May 2015
Education Review August 2013
Education Review August 2010