Busy Bees Manchester Street

Education institution number:
50131
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
85
Telephone:
Address:

154 Manchester Street, Feilding

View on map

Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Puddleducks’ Nursery and Preschool are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)


Whakaū Embedding

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 

Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whakaū Embedding
Whakaū Embedding

2 Context of the Service

The service is one of seven within the Manawatū in the Aspiring Services Ltd group. The centre is supported by a senior leadership team and board, with day-to-day management overseen by a centre leader. The roll is ethnically diverse and a small number of learners are Māori or Pacific.

3 Summary of findings

The centre curriculum and environment clearly affirm and celebrate the cultures of children attending. Alongside their peers, Māori and Pacific learners experience elements of their culture through language, music and relevant resources. Leaders have identified the need to grow consistent use of te reo Māori across the centre. Assessment of children’s learning reflects their individual identity. All children experience a bicultural curriculum that celebrates elements of their language, stories and ways of being.

Strong learning focused relationships between families and teachers enhance children’s learning. The views of parents inform aspects of curriculum design and evaluation.

Children’s learning is well supported by teachers’ growing professional knowledge. Consistent teaching practices are evident. Internal evaluation results in strengthened teaching and shows positive impacts for children. Leaders and teachers are yet to fully evaluate how well changes in teaching have worked, and for which groups of children, as they grow their collective capability. Ongoing positive outcomes are supported by a focus on growing leaders from within the centre.

Children and their families benefit from intentional actions of senior leadership and governance to support inclusion and equity. Stewardship provided at this level supports ongoing development for the varied experience of teachers and leaders. Positive and consistent outcomes for all children are the basis of decision making at a strategic level. The relationship the centre has with its community informs strategic planning across the wider organisation. Organisational leaders are yet to utilise evaluation findings to understand progress toward strategic priorities.

4 Improvement actions

Puddleducks’ Nursery and Preschool will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Continue to work alongside families to align established learning priorities with the outcomes in Te Whāriki to more deeply reflect the learning that matters in assessment for children’s learning and evaluation.

  • Align internal evaluation practices to the organisation’s strategic goals and centre priorities to support understanding of what has worked, why and for which groups of children.

  • Senior leadership utilise findings of centre level evaluation to monitor, understand progress toward, and evaluate strategic priorities.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Puddleducks’ Nursery and Preschool completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

17 January 2023 

6 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Puddleducks’ Nursery and Preschool

Profile Number

50131

Location

Feilding

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

78 children, including up to 28 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

95

Review team on site

November 2022

Date of this report

17 January 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, August 2018; Education Review, June 2014

Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool - 30/08/2018

1 Evaluation of Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool

How well placed is Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Puddleducks’ Nursery and Preschool is one of three privately owned centres operating under Aspiring Services Ltd. The service is situated in Feilding. The Nursery and Preschool had separate licences when ERO reviewed the services in 2014. They are now one, and licensed to provide all day education and care five days a week for 68 children, including 28 up to the age of two years at any one time. A mid-day meal is provided.

A board of directors and an advisory board undertake the governance role. In June 2017, significant changes were made at the governance and management level at the Aspiring Service's centres. A managing director and educational leader have responsibility for overseeing strategic operation and professional practice in all three centres. Each centre has a professional leader and team leaders.

In this service, the professional leader is not part of the teaching ratio and oversees curriculum delivery, professional practice and the day-to-day operation of the service. Of the 17 teachers employed, 10 have current practising certificates with the Education Council of Aotearoa.

The physical learning environment is organised into distinct spaces for infants, toddlers and children aged over 30 months to five years. Each group has its own teaching team and team leader.

At the time of this ERO evaluation, an internal evaluation of the service philosophy is underway. This is a collaborative exercise involving staff, families and whānau.

This review was part of a cluster of three reviews of Aspiring Services Ltd.

The Review Findings

Children's learning and holistic development is encouraged through a range of planned and spontaneous learning experiences. Desired outcomes for children and curriculum development align well with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Teachers are building their collective curriculum knowledge through internal professional learning.

A positive tone and inclusive practice permeates the service. The youngest children attending are nurtured within a culture of care by attentive key caregivers. Practice for transitioning children into, between and from the centre's learning spaces is flexible and responsive to each child's and family's needs. Children identified with additional learning needs are well catered for.

Teachers know children's interests, preferences and needs well. Assessment practice enables teachers to deliberately promote and progress children's learning. Policies and procedures to guide effective teaching have not been reviewed for some time. Although there are strategies in place to support teachers to achieve a consistent standard of assessment practice, quality is variable.

Effective strategies are in place to involve parents and whānau in their children's education. They regularly receive information about their children's learning and development and actively engage in the life of the centre.

A strategic aim to build capacity and teachers' capability to provide a culturally responsive curriculum is well supported through external professional development and learning. Te ao Māori is an integral part of all children's daily experiences. Responding to and reflecting each child's culture, language and identity in the curriculum and assessment practice are ongoing developments.

Systems and processes related to governance and management have not been rigorously implemented. Management and governance are beginning to address this through the recent appointment of a managing director and operations manager.

Managers and leaders continue to build their knowledge to lead effective internal evaluation and support teachers' ongoing professional growth. Leaders and teachers are highly reflective practitioners who work collaboratively to continually improve teaching practice and learning outcomes for children. There are examples, across the Aspiring Services centres, where planned internal evaluation and appraisal practice is very well led. Managers and leaders need to identify these pockets of good practice, determine the processes and practices that are working well and support all teams and teachers, across the three services, to achieve a consistently high standard of practice.

Key Next Steps

Governance, managers and leaders need to improve strategic and annual planning to be assured of the effective operation of the service; that internal evaluation for improvement and accountability is well understood; and that policies and procedures are rigorously implemented.

Priorities for development are in:

  • further developing documents to guide curriculum implementation and teaching practice, with a deliberate focus on outcomes for children

  • building managers', leaders' and teachers' capability through consistent robust appraisal practice, responsive to the needs and goals of individuals

  • continuing to build effective internal evaluation and consistency of practice across all the Aspiring Services.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

To improve current practice managers need to ensure policies and procedures for personnel resource management are fit for purpose and well implemented.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool will be in three years.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review & Improvement Services Central

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

30 August 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Feilding

Ministry of Education profile number

50131

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

68 children, including up to 28 aged under 2

Service roll

90

Gender composition

Boys 53, Girls 37

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Pacific
Other ethnic groups

11
73
2
4

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

June 2018

Date of this report

30 August 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

This is the first review for this service on one licence

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool - 25/06/2014

1 Evaluation of Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool

How well placed is Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Puddleducks’ Nursery and Preschool is one of five privately owned centres operating under the umbrella of Aspiring Services Ltd. The centre is located in Feilding on the same site as Puddleducks’ Junior School. Three company directors and an advisory board undertake the governance role for all Puddleducks' services.

Centre management and teachers provide education and care for 50 children, including 22 up to two years old, five days a week. Meals are provided for all children. Teacher-to-child ratios are high.

The Review Findings

The centre philosophy and vision are evident in practice. Children are highly engaged, inquiring learners who take responsibility for themselves and others. Teachers are respectful and affirming in their interactions with children. They listen to children and know them well.

There is a strong focus on purposeful teaching. Teachers provide a curriculum that is responsive to infants, toddlers and young children’s interests. Consistency of primary care practices supports younger children's need for strong and secure attachments.

Planning is based on children’s interests, ideas and strengths. Documentation occurs through learning stories which are presented in attractive profile books and on centre walls. Teachers receive feedback from leaders about the quality of learning stories and in relation to centre expectations. Teachers have recently decided to make profile books more accessible to infants and toddlers. Staff continue to encourage more parent input into assessment.

The head teacher encourages developing leadership among teachers. A new appraisal process has been implemented, linked to professional growth and teacher registration. Self review is ongoing and responsive. Leaders establish a collaborative culture in which children are valued, celebrated and affirmed for who they are and what they bring to the service.

Centre owners and managers are committed to the development of the service as an organisation where innovative practice is valued, staff are well qualified and practice is sound. A well-organised approach to governance is evident. Regular meetings and reports from centre leaders are well used to enhance outcomes for children.

Parents have many opportunities to be involved in contributing to the life of the centre. Thoughtful consideration is given to transition practices as children move through the centre. Teachers actively support children’s transition to primary school through visits and providing parents with information about this next step for their child. Leaders have identified that further strengthening liaison with local schools should assist children to make good transitions.

Bicultural practice is developing. Te reo Māori is used by some teachers in their interactions with children. An ongoing focus on whanaungatanga is strengthening links with homes and children’s heritages. Teachers express commitment to continued improvement in their understanding of te ao Māori.

Teachers are aware of the importance of being culturally responsive in order that all learners are suitably supported. They agree on the need to further develop thinking around provision for learners from Pacific ethnic backgrounds.

High expectations for staff practice, behaviour and improvement are clearly stated. A good range of documents guides teaching practice. Feedback is sought about the quality of employees’ practice which is used to promote improvement and develop capable teachers. Staff wellbeing is actively supported. Succession planning is in place to ensure sustainability.

Key Next Steps

Centre managers and leaders have identified that they need to:

  • develop a matrix to better guide feedback to teachers about their practice
  • further develop self review to be more evaluative, linked to quality and strategic.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Puddleducks' Nursery and Preschool will be in three years.Image removed.

Joyce Gebbie

National Manager Review Services Central Region

25 June 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Feilding

Ministry of Education profile number

50131

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 22 aged up to 2

Service roll

73

Gender composition

Boys 41, Girls 32

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Other ethnic groups

6

61

6

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:6

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2014

Date of this report

25 June 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2011

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.