Pukeatua Childcare Centre

Education institution number:
46195
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
25
Telephone:
Address:

17 Fraser Street, Wainuiomata, Lower Hutt

View on map

Pukeatua Childcare Centre

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Pukeatua Childcare Centre is governed by Kokiri Pukeatua Trust, Te Rūnanganui o Te Atiawa. Approximately two thirds of children who attend are Māori or of Pacific heritage. There have been staffing changes since the February 2022 ERO review. The service returned to a full licence in August 2022.

Summary of Review Findings

The curriculum supports each child to be confident in their own culture. They are given opportunities to develop knowledge and an understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. Children’s developing social competence is supported by the curriculum. Assessment, planning and evaluation demonstrate an understanding of children’s interests, whānau and life contexts.

Positive steps are taken to respect and acknowledge the aspirations held by parents and whānau for their children. Regular opportunities (formal and informal) are provided for parents and whānau to communicate with kaiako about their child’s learning.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • continuing to build kaiako understanding and use of the learning outcomes from Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum

  • improving the extent to which assessment information shows children’s learning and progress over time.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.                                                                             

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

8 June 2023

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Pukeatua Childcare Centre

Profile Number

46195

Location

Wainuiomata, Lower Hutt

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

34 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

50-79%

Service roll

30

Review team on site

May 2023

Date of this report

8 June 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Akanuku | Assurance Review, February 2022
Education Review, June 2017

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a license to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Pukeatua Childcare Centre - 18/02/2022

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Not meeting

Governance, management and administration

Not meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified areas of non-compliance with regulatory standards that are an unacceptable risk to children.

Background

Pukeatua Childcare Centre is governed by Kokiri Pukeatua Trust, Te Rūnanganui o Te Atiawa. Since the June 2017 report, a new teaching team has been established that includes a head teacher and senior teacher. The service provides education and care in two large, separate learning areas to meet the needs of the children attending. 

Summary of Review Findings

The service does not meet regulatory standards in a number of areas. Governance and management are yet to implement a regular appraisal process and provide opportunities to collaborate with parents and whānau about the service operations. Consistent implementation of health and safety practices is required to meet all aspects of regulatory compliance.

The curriculum provides children with a range of experiences and opportunities to support their interests and needs. Infants, toddlers and older children experience respectful interactions with adults. The premises support the provision of different kinds of indoor and outdoor play, and allows for suitable
supervision.

Actions for Compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • consistently recording the time each child attending the service sleeps, and checks made by adults during that time 
  • consistent evidence of approval from the person responsible for excursions 
  • consistent recording of all medications given to children attending the service including written authority and acknowledgement from parents
  • information is provided to parents about how they can be involved in the service, amount and details of the expenditure of MOE funding and any planned reviews and consultation
  • parents are provided with opportunities to contribute to the development and review of the service’s operational documents
  • a system of regular appraisal for all qualified teachers.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS9, HS17, HS28, GMA3, GMA4, GMA7. 

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • the first aid kit complies with the requirements of Appendix 1, and is easily recognisable to adults 
  • secured a microwave, wall unit and piano that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage
  • a documented risk management system that shows that accidents and incident records are analysed to identify hazards and appropriate action is taken. Hazards to the safety of children are eliminated, isolated or minimised
  • temperature of warm water delivered from taps that are accessible to children is no higher than 40°C, and comfortable for children to use
  • water stored in any hot water cylinder is kept at a temperature of at least 60°C
  • a record of training and/or information provided to adults who administer medicine to children.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, PF28, HS6, HS12, HS13, HS14, HS29.

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends that the Ministry reassess the licence issued to this service provider. ERO will not undertake a further review of this service until the Ministry of Education is satisfied that the service meets regulatory standards.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)
Southern Region | Te Tai Tini

18 February 2022 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name Pukeatua Childcare Centre
Profile Number

46195

Location Wainuiomata

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 10 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

50-79%

Service roll

43

Ethnic composition

Māori 22, NZ European/Pākehā 6, Samoan 4, Other Pacific heritages 4, Other ethnicities 7.

Review team on site

November 2021

Date of this report

18 February 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review June 2017, Education Review October 2014.

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Pukeatua Childcare Centre - 21/06/2017

1 Evaluation of Pukeatua Childcare Centre

How well placed is Pukeatua Childcare Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Pukeatua Childcare Centre is licensed for 65 children, including 20 children aged up to two years. It is a full day service. Of the children who attend, 22 are Māori and 12 are Pacific.

The philosophy is underpinned by the virtues of respect, aroha and resilience. These are known and displayed by and for children, families and staff.

A centre manager, head teacher and assistant head teacher form the leadership team, with assistance from a senior teacher. The centre is governed by Kokiri Pukeatua Trust, Te Rūnanganui o Te Atiawa that has other community services on the same site.

Since the October 2014 ERO report, some new staff have been appointed. The provisionally registered teachers are supported by fully registered staff. A Ministry of Education (MoE) funded programme, Strengthening Early Learning Opportunities (SELO), has supported the centre to address the findings of the previous ERO review.

Areas for improvement identified in ERO's previous report included: better provision for outside play; planning, assessment and evaluation of children's learning; an effective advice and guidance programme for provisionally registered teachers; and support for staff to learn about internal evaluation. Underpinning centre improvements was the need to build a collaborative professional team.  These developments have been monitored by ERO and supported by the MoE. Priorities have been to better meet the learning needs of children and the improve centre administration.

The development of the outdoor environment has provided increased space for children to learn. There are designated areas for younger children to play with their peers. 

The Review Findings

Significant improvements have been made to the overall development of the centre since the previous ERO review, promoting positive learning outcomes for children.

Teachers and centre managers have collaboratively undertaken several reviews of the philosophy since the service opened in 2013. The current philosophy is very well known and shared. The agreed virtues of resilience, aroha and respect guide and support ongoing, staff-identified improvements.

Learning opportunities have improved. Children's needs inform teaching and centre-wide decisions. Children's play is sustained through skilful and deliberate support from teachers. Staff learn about the language and culture of children. Children's wellbeing is a priority.

Relationships with whānau and families continue to be a strength. Parents are well informed, through a variety of ways, about what is happening for their child each day and plans for their ongoing development.

Whānau of Māori children enjoy positive, trusting relationships with teachers, who know about aspirations held for their children. Families who identify as Pacific hear their language spoken and their culture valued.

Across the centre, children with diverse learning needs have both internal and external, appropriately targeted support. Well-considered approaches are evaluated to ensure children have good quality teaching and learning opportunities.

Children aged up to two years play and are nurtured mostly in designated areas. Each individual's care is carefully managed.

The manager, leaders and trustees, work cooperatively to provide a nurturing, positive place for children to learn. The newly created leadership team implement teaching and learning initiatives that contribute to positive outcomes for children.  Leaders encourage teachers to follow their interests, strengths and passions and to lead aspects of centre operation.

Assessment, planning and evaluation of the programme have been significantly strengthened. A new system has been introduced, trialled and is now in use. Considerable thought and reflection has led to a system that guides good quality learning for children. There is increasing teacher understanding of how children learn. Teachers appreciate professional discussion about how to better support children. The centre programme is continually under review to ensure it is meeting the learning needs and care of children.

A robust, well considered process for the appraisal of teachers supports their development. This includes regular discussions with the head teacher, who accesses appropriate professional development for staff. Provisionally registered teachers are appropriately supported to improve their teaching and to meet registration requirements. 

Staff are increasing their capacity to use internal evaluation for accountability and improvement. It is effectively led by leaders who share research, best practice and their knowledge of early childhood education to inform decisions made about significant developments. The current review being undertaken is evaluating how well transition to school practices are supporting children and their families.

Key Next Steps

ERO and centre managers agree the next steps are to continue to:

  • strengthen assessment, planning and evaluation of children's learning
  • consider the organisation of the spaces for children's play and to evaluate the impact of internal review findings.

Staff should ensure the curriculum includes perspectives, stories and waiata of mana whenua.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Pukeatua Childcare Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist.  In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. 

In order to improve practice, trustees need to ensure that:

  • the head teacher has opportunity to complete the annual appraisal cycle to support her professional development
  • an appropriate Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) policy, and associated user agreements and procedures are in place.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Pukeatua Childcare Centre will be in three years. 

Alan Wynyard
Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

21 June 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Wainuiomata

Ministry of Education profile number

46195

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

65 children, including up to 20 aged under 2

Service roll

54 children

Gender composition

Boys 30, Girls 24

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Samoan
Pacific
Other ethnic groups

22
16
  8
  4
  4

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

April 2017

Date of this report

21 June 2017

Most recent ERO report(s) 

Education Review

October 2014

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whānaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.