Pukeko Preschool Manurewa

Education institution number:
45316
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
65
Telephone:
Address:

13 Jellicoe Road, Manurewa, Auckland

View on map

Pukeko Preschool Manurewa

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence. 

ERO’s judgements for Pukeko Preschool Manurewa are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whakatō Emerging

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 
Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whāngai Establishing

Whakatō Emerging

2 Context of the Service

Pukeko Preschool Manurewa is one of six services in the Pukeko Preschool group. An operations manager and a curriculum manager provide governance and leadership support. A qualified centre manager leads the team and is responsible for daily operations. Almost a half of the children enrolled are from Pacific heritages and a small number are Māori

3 Summary of findings

Children demonstrate a good sense of belonging. They communicate their feelings and ideas with their peers. Teachers are used for support and comfort when needed. Teachers provide well-resourced environments and experiences which encourage children to revisit learning. Infants and toddlers benefit from teachers respecting their individual routines.

Teachers prioritise the development of children’s oral language. They respond effectively to the verbal and non-verbal communication of infants and toddlers. Older children have opportunities to explore mathematical symbols, print and a range of literacy resources. 

Opportunities are provided for children to learn basic te reo Māori through words, waiata and karakia.

Teachers encourage children to respect and understand other cultures by reflecting children’s cultural identity within the environment and through centre events. 

Assessment practices follow a process of notice, recognise, and respond. Teachers plan activities in response to children’s interests. They have built relationships with whānau and gather the aspirations they hold for their children’s learning. These are not yet used to inform the curriculum. Curriculum evaluation does not yet identify the effectiveness of teaching strategies in improving outcomes for children. 

Governance and leadership are establishing processes to build teacher capability. Teachers have opportunities to access relevant professional learning and development. Professional leaders have recently been appointed with an aim to further improve teaching practice.   

A culture of relational trust is evident amongst leaders and teachers. A process of self-review is in place. Internal evaluation systems are in the early stage of development in individual services and at an organisational level.  Better monitoring of health and safety is required.

4 Improvement actions

Pukeko Preschool Manurewa will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

Leaders and teachers to continue to:  

  • Document teachers’ response to children’s interests and dispositions.
  • Use parents’ aspirations to inform assessment, planning and evaluation.

Governance and management to:  

  • Support individual Pukeko services to review and implement a philosophy that in partnership with whānau reflects identified priorities for children's learning, and organisational values.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Pukeko Preschool Manurewa completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

6 Actions for Compliance

The service has provided ERO with evidence to show the following non-compliances have been addressed:

  • Ensuring adults providing education and care are familiar with relevant emergency drills and carry out each type of drill with children (as appropriate) on an, at least, three-monthly basis (HS8).
  • Having a procedure for monitoring children's sleep that ensures that children: are checked for warmth, breathing, and general well-being at least every 5-10 minutes, or more frequently according to individual needs (HS9).
  • Having evidence of parental permission and approval of adult: child ratios for regular excursions at the time of enrolment (HS17). 

Next ERO Review 

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation. 

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

22 November 2023 

7 About the Early Childhood Service 

Early Childhood Service NamePukeko Preschool Manurewa
Profile Number45316
LocationManurewa, Auckland
Service type Education and care service
Number licensed for 70 children, including up to 20 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers 80-99%
Service roll65
Review team on siteAugust 2023
Date of this report22 November 2023
Most recent ERO report(s)

Akanuku | Assurance Review, February 2021; Education Review May 2018

 

 

Pukeko Preschool Manurewa - 11/02/2021

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

CurriculumMeeting
Premises and facilitiesMeeting
Health and safetyMeeting
Governance, management and administrationMeeting

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Pukeko Preschool Manurewa is one of five privately owned centres that operate under Pukeko Preschools. Previously known as Little Bears, the service has been relicensed with new ownership since June 2019. It serves a multicultural local community providing full-day care and education for children from infants to school age.

Summary of Review Findings

Children experience positive, respectful interactions with adults. Teachers plan, implement, and evaluate a curriculum that is designed to enhance children’s learning experiences.

The curriculum reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. It encourages children to be confident in their own cultures and languages and to develop understanding and respect for other cultures. Teachers provide opportunities to collaborate with parents and whānau about the service’s operations and their children’s learning.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • parents have given prior written approval to their child's participation and for mode of travel
  • heavy equipment stored on shelves that can fall and topple.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS6, HS17, HS18

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)

Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

11 February 2021

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service NamePukeko Preschool Manurewa
Profile Number45316
LocationManurewa, Auckland
Service typeEducation and care service
Number licensed for70 children, including up to 5 aged under 2.
Percentage of qualified teachers80%+
Service roll34
Ethnic compositionMāori 5 
Fijian Indian 7
Kiribati 6 
Filipino 5
Indian 4 
Samoan 4
other ethnic groups 3
Review team on siteNovember 2020
Date of this report11 February 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review May 2018

Education Review November 2014

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Little Bears Early Childhood Education & Care Centre - 11/05/2018

1 Evaluation of Little Bears Early Childhood Education & Care Centre

How well placed is Little Bears Early Childhood Education & Care Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Little Bears Early Childhood Education and Care Centre is one of two privately owned centres that operate in South Auckland. The centre is licensed for 50 children and provides a full day service. Half of the children enrolled are Māori, and half are Kiribati or from other Pacific backgrounds.

Managers and teachers are in the process of reviewing the centre's philosophy statement. The draft statement drives to provide a rich, inclusive learning environment and a curriculum that promotes children as socially competent, confident learners with a strong sense of belonging.

In the last 16 months, staff changes have occurred. There is a new centre manager, a new curriculum leader and a new teacher for the over two year olds. Four of the five teachers have an early childhood qualification.

The 2014 ERO report commented favourably about the significant development in curriculum, teaching and management practices that resulted in positive outcomes for children and their families. Most of these developments continue to be evident.

The Review Findings

Children settle quickly and show confidence exploring the learning environment, which supports child initiated play. They clearly articulate their desires to teachers. Children are friendly and generally play well together. Unobtrusive routines help children to make choices about their day. Teachers use respectful practices. Good nurturing care and individualised support are provided for children under two years of age. A next step is to provide children over five years of age with a differentiated approach to their ongoing development in readiness for school.

Children engage in meaningful play in distinct separate areas catering for groups under two years and over two years of age. Children also enjoy separate outdoor areas. The programme is flexible so that children under two can play in the over two area. This supports transitions within the centre.

Children have good opportunities to develop their oral language. Teachers skilfully model and support children to acquire and further develop their oracy. Some teachers are also competent in using children's home languages. This use of children's heritage languages enhances children's identity, language and culture. A next step is continuing to strengthen practices that contribute to Māori children enjoying success as Māori and promote the dual heritage of Aotearoa.

Teachers are implementing new planning, assessment and evaluation processes. By emphasising intentional teaching and explicit development of dispositions in their planning, teachers are aiming to improve outcomes for children. Children's portfolios show a compilation of individual children's experiences and progress over time. Centre leaders have appropriately identified that further work is needed in assessment and evaluation to focus on the learning of individual children and the teacher's role in enhancing children's learning.

Managers, leaders and teachers have established respectful relationships with parents and whānau. They know families well and support them to have equitable access so that children can participate in early childhood education. Managers and leaders are now focusing on strengthening parent partnership in their children's learning.

The owner and the centre manager are leading internal evaluations that promote ownership and shared understandings among the newly established team, about the centre's vision, philosophy, and strategic direction.

Managers and leaders evaluate the effectiveness of the service they provide for children and their families and identify appropriate next steps for ongoing improvement. Internal evaluation continues to promote positive outcomes for children. Strategic goals are documented. A next step is to strengthen the annual plan to better support the realisation of centre goals.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders have agreed that key next steps include:

  • strengthening the curriculum to make bicultural practices more visible, further developing early literacy and numeracy learning, and strengthening teachers' focus on developing children's dispositions

  • strengthening the annual plan to achieve the strategic goals of the centre

  • evaluating the centre's health and safety framework to identify and make improvements to practice.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Little Bears Early Childhood Education & Care Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Little Bears Early Childhood Education & Care Centre will be in three years.

Julie Foley

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

11 May 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Manurewa, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

45316

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

40

Gender composition

Boys 21 Girls 19

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Kiribati
Cook Island Māori
Samoan
Tongan

17
1
9
7
5
1

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

January 2018

Date of this report

11 May 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Supplementary Review

November 2014

Supplementary Review

June 2013

Supplementary Review

March 2012

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.