Reid Park Kindergarten

Education institution number:
5510
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
39
Telephone:
Address:

63 Murray Street, Mosgiel

View on map

Reid Park Kindergarten - 22/05/2020

1 Evaluation of Reid Park Kindergarten

How well placed is Reid Park Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Reid Park Kindergarten is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Reid Park Kindergarten provides early childhood education for children aged two years old to school age. It is licensed for 45 children and currently has a roll of 51. Nine children identify as Māori and five as from other ethnic groups. Sessions operate from 8.30am to 2.30pm.

Teachers aim to support children to develop early literacy and numeracy, social and emotional competency, be active explorers, be creative and independent, and have respect for Papatuanuku. They seek to achieve this through partnerships with families, valuing children's voice and culture, celebrating diversity, and fostering children's sense of belonging in respectful and inclusive ways.

The teaching team has made good progress in addressing the areas for development identified in the kindergarten's November 2015 ERO report. These included improving aspects of planning, assessment and evaluation for individuals and group learning.

Reid Park Kindergarten is one of 24 kindergartens governed by Dunedin Kindergartens (DK). Day-to-day operations are led by a head teacher, with the support of three experienced, qualified teachers and a teacher aide. A senior teacher from DK provides support for professional and operational practice.

This review was part of a cluster of seven DK kindergartens.

The Review Findings

Children's learning benefits from an environment that is calm and welcoming. Relationships are inclusive, respectful and guided by manaakitanga. Children play well alongside and with each other. Teachers know each child very well and work closely with parents to best meet their learning needs. Māori and other cultures are valued in the curriculum and highly visible in the environment.

The indoor and outdoor environment is beautifully resourced and presented to engage and provoke learning. The spaces, resources and equipment provide a range of rich opportunities for play and exploration, and strongly support the physical and social developmental needs of the different groups of children.

Children experience a broad and interesting curriculum that supports the kindergarten's priorities for learning. Teachers deliberately provide experiences to foster children's social competency, early literacy and mathematics, and their fine and gross motor skills. They prioritise te reo me ngā tikanga Māori, including local cultural narratives.

Priority learners are very well supported. Teachers plan carefully in order to best meet the needs and interests of two year olds. They work closely with parents and external experts to best support children with additional needs. Māori children's culture and language are affirmed, enabling them to stand proud in their culture.

Teachers have developed effective assessment, planning and evaluation processes. Children's profiles include relevant learning goals, unpack significant learning and show progress over time. These value children's language, culture and identity. Group planning is based on Te Whāriki, has clear learning outcomes and results in well-considered resourcing and experiences. Teachers and ERO agree that teachers need to better document their discussions about children's goals and relevant teaching strategies. Parents' contributions could be more visible in learning records.

Teachers are reflective and improvement focused. Strategic priorities and plans are based on what matters most for children. There is strong alignment from these to professional learning. Internal evaluation has resulted in research-informed improvements to teaching and outcomes for children. Teachers and ERO agree that aspects of internal evaluation could be strengthened.

The DK board has made good progress in addressing the governance recommendations from ERO's 2016 reviews. The DK's mission and strategic priorities are well known and reflected in each kindergarten's strategic and annual plans. It has a sound policy and procedure framework that provides guidance for kindergartens and sound systems to monitor health and safety. Leaders and teachers benefit from relevant professional development and leadership support. The DK actively supports equity of outcomes for all children by funding additional teaching resources to support children with additional needs.

Key Next Steps

Leaders and teachers have identified, and ERO agrees, that to further improve outcomes for children they need to:

  • deepen aspects of the evaluation process for planned evaluations
  • ensure regular and documented team discussions about individual children's goals and planned teaching strategies are in place
  • make parents' contributions to children's learning more visible in learning records.

The DK board has clearly identified, and ERO agrees, that the key next steps for DK to further improve outcomes for children are to ensure that:

  • reporting and monitoring at all levels are evaluative, to clearly show how desired outcomes for children have been improved in relation to the DK and kindergartens’ priorities for learning and other strategic priorities

  • a robust and systematic quality assurance framework is implemented to inform and monitor ongoing improvements in each kindergarten.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Reid Park Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)

Southern Region - Te Tai Tini

22 May 2020

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Mosgiel

Ministry of Education profile number

5510

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

45 children over two years of age

Service roll

51

Gender composition

Girls 30

Boys 21

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
Other

9
37
5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

N/A

N/A

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

January 2020

Date of this report

22 May 2020

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review

November 2015

Education Review

September 2012

Education Review

May 2009

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Reid Park Kindergarten - 04/11/2015

1 Evaluation of Reid Park Kindergarten

How well placed is Reid Park Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Reid Park Kindergarten is located in Mosgiel, close to Dunedin. It provides education and care for children from two-to-five years old. Forty children attend in the morning and thirty children stay for the afternoon.

The teachers are all qualified and have worked together for some years.

There have been recent renovations to the inside and outside areas. The outdoor area is still being developed. An enthusiastic parent committee supports the kindergarten through fundraising efforts.

The kindergarten has made some progress on developing self-review practices. This was a recommendation in the September 2012 ERO report.

The kindergarten operates under the Dunedin Kindergartens (DK) umbrella. DK provides management and professional support for the teachers. This review was part of a cluster of 24 kindergarten reviews in the DK.

The Review Findings

Children have close and trusting relationships with their teachers. Parents and whānau are warmly welcomed, and they feel comfortable to stay and play alongside their children. This builds a strong sense of belonging and confidence for children in the kindergarten. Children play in a settled way and make friendships with one another. Teachers foster children’s caring attitudes and encourage them to help others.

Teachers play close attention to fostering children’s language development. Teachers encourage children’s talk, accept and respect what they say and build their confidence in social situations. Teachers respect children’s ideas and make sure they have a say in the design of the programme and environment. For example, children helped design the new cycle track.

Teachers get to know children well and use this knowledge to help plan interesting programmes for them. Teachers follow children’s enthusiasms to open up a world of learning. For example, the children’s interest in Matariki celebrations led them to exploring planets and the solar system. Children are learning about researching, mathematics and literacy through these interesting topics.

Children and teachers use te reo Māori through the day. Children enjoy and enthusiastically sing waiata and celebrate events such as Polyfest and Matariki. Māori perspectives are included in group planning. Group stories show how Māori children’s language, culture and identity are supported. However this is not so clear in individual children’s stories.

Teachers have useful systems for planning for individuals and groups of children. They seek parents’ wishes for their children’s learning and wellbeing and find ways to respond within planning.

The outdoor areas have been imaginatively designed to ignite children’s curiosity and invite physical exploration. They offer challenges and interest for all ages. Children benefit from a wide range of learning experiences such as gardening, cooking, excursions and community connections.

The teachers have responded to parents’ wishes and input from local schools in developing a planned transition-to-school programme for older children.

Teachers work well together. They know each other well and respect the strengths each contributes to the team. Teachers attend professional learning and development opportunities and use these to challenge and stimulate their thinking and to make improvements. Teachers have a useful format and schedule to guide self review. This has led to some improvements.

Teachers have a number of ideas about what they want for the future of the kindergarten. Their ideas could be developed into long-term plans that show the priorities and actions to achieve the desired outcomes. Related systems such as professional learning, appraisal, self-review topics and senior teacher support could then be aligned to strengthen the strategic focus.

The vision of the DK is to provide excellence in early childhood education for all children. The DK is governed by a board and managed by a long-serving general manager. The kindergarten teachers told ERO they appreciated the support they receive from the association and the advice and guidance of the senior teachers.

The board, general manager and senior teachers:

  • provide appropriate opportunities for parents and staff to contribute their ideas about matters in the association
  • are responsive to identified needs of children and families within the association and provide funding and support to enable these to be met
  • have developed a useful framework to guide their work
  • take all reasonable steps to ensure safe environments for children, teachers and staff
  • maintain their professional learning and provide ongoing professional learning for teachers in the association. 

Key Next Steps

The teachers and ERO agree that the next steps are to strengthen aspects of planning. The teachers and senior teachers should work together to consistently show:

  • the intended learning and strategies in group plans
  • evaluation of the learning in group plans
  • genuine partnership with parents in how goals for children are decided
  • children’s progress in the records of learning
  • how children’s language, culture and identity are valued and affirmed in records of learning.

Teachers could redesign their kindergarten philosophy to show the depth of priorities for learning and what makes this kindergarten unique.

Teachers need to further develop their understanding of rigorous self review and use this to review all aspects of the programme that have a significant impact on children’s learning and wellbeing.

Next steps for the board, with the support of the general manager and senior teachers, are to:

  • continue to define what excellence in education looks like in the DK
  • further develop strategic planning to better show future goals and priorities and how these will be achieved in the association and in the kindergartens
  • ensure that the reports they receive are evaluative, show how well the DK’s vision and goals are met, and inform future planning
  • continue to strengthen the appraisal process and be assured that appraisals are rigorous and consistent throughout the kindergartens.

With the appointment of a new senior teacher it is timely for the board and general manager to review the role of the senior teachers and strengthen systems to ensure consistent high quality practice across all kindergartens within the DK.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Reid Park Kindergarten completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing: 

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Reid Park Kindergarten will be in three years. 

Chris Rowe
Deputy Chief Review Officer Southern (Acting)

4 November 2015 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Mosgiel

Ministry of Education profile number

5510

Licence type

Free Kindergarten

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

45 children over two years of age

Service roll

57

Gender composition

Boys: 29

Girls: 28

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Cook Island
Other Ethnicities

  6
45
  2
  4

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

Not Applicable

 

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

September 2015

Date of this report

4 November 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

September 2012

Education Review

May 2009

Education Review

February 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.