Riverhills Early Learning Centre

Education institution number:
25105
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
30
Telephone:
Address:

4 Waikaremoana Place, Pakuranga, Auckland

View on map

Riverhills Early Learning Centre - 15/05/2020

1 Evaluation of Riverhills Early Learning Centre

How well placed is Riverhills Early Learning Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Riverhills Early Learning Centre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Riverhills Early Learning Centre operates from an adapted residential property in East Auckland. It is licensed for 35 children, including five children up to two years of age. Families attending the centre come from diverse cultures with half being of Māori heritage. A small number of children come from the Pacific nations of Samoa, Tonga and the Cook Islands. Staff have been employed to reflect the cultures of families attending the centre.

The centre philosophy expresses the goal of providing whānau and tamariki with a sense of belonging. It recognises the value of collaboration as vital to the success of the programme. Four key principles focus on attitudes, being present for and enjoying others, and promoting a positive work environment.

Since the 2016 ERO report the centre has been modified internally and has had its outdoor area revamped. The service operated from a classroom at a local school for 18 months during these alterations. Most staff members are recent appointments. The teaching team includes three registered teachers and two teachers in training.

The centre continues to reflect strengths identified in the 2016 ERO report. Staff have made progress in consolidating planning and assessment processes and other reported areas for improvement. However, extending children's thinking and complex play, reviewing resources, and documenting children's individual interests over time remain areas to address.

The Review Findings

Children are welcomed into a mixed-aged learning environment. They are supported to settle and form positive relationships with their peers and teachers. Children know routines and engage in them well. They receive good quality care and enjoy their time together within a family-like culture. Children would benefit from opportunities to lead their learning in more meaningful ways.

Infants and toddlers gain from tuakana/teina experiences as well as having access to their own separate space. Teachers are culturally responsive, caring and respond positively to these young children's needs.

Teachers have placed more emphasis on delivering a bicultural programme. Features of tikanga Māori are evident, as are the manaakitanga and whanaungatanga shown by staff to children and their whānau. Aspects of te ao Māori are evident in centre displays, interactions with children and karakia.

Teachers' communication with parents has strengthened over time. An online system is enabling parents to contribute more fully in their child's learning. Teachers have recently introduced new ways of planning and assessment. They work collaboratively to plan programmes for individual and groups of children's interests and strengths. Teachers should also consider ways to extend each child's learning.

The centre has established strong links with the local school. This has resulted in good practices for children transitioning to that school. Teachers also sensitively manage transitions for children and families into the centre.

The centre owner adopts a collaborative leadership approach. Positive staff relationships and wellbeing are features of the centre. Staff strengths are used to develop leadership opportunities. Spontaneous internal evaluation is well documented with good prompts and inquiry questions to assist the process. Teachers should plan for longer term internal evaluation, particularly in relation to the key next steps identified below.

The long-serving owner has been deliberate in the centre's future direction, including expansion of the building, facilities and grounds, to improve conditions for children and staff. Many policies and procedures have been updated to reflect current legislative requirements. An appraisal process is evident and should be strengthened by documenting an appraisal policy and related procedures.

Key Next Steps

Key next steps include:

  • extending children's thinking and complex play through play-based learning

  • developing children's independence to make choices about their learning

  • ensuring all staff have opportunities to develop their teaching capability

  • implementing and documenting planned internal evaluation that links with strategic and annual planning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Riverhills Early Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)

Northern Region - Te Tai Raki

15 May 2020

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Pakuranga, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

25105

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

35 children, including up to 5 aged under 2 years

Service roll

24

Gender composition

Boys 14 Girls 10

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
Pacific
other ethnic groups

12
6
4
2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2020

Date of this report

15 May 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

February 2016

Education Review

March 2013

Education Review

January 2012

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Riverhills Early Learning Centre - 22/02/2016

1 Evaluation of Riverhills Early Learning Centre

How well placed is Riverhills Early Learning Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Riverhills Early Learning Centre is licensed for 25 children including 2 children aged under two years. The centre provides full day programmes in an adapted residential property in Pakuranga. The centre’s roll reflects its multicultural community. The children attending the centre are predominately Pākehā, Māori, Indian and Chinese.

The centre’s philosophy promotes a tuākana- tēina approach where younger and older children can learn from each other. Children have, in mixed age groups, opportunities to interact and play together for periods of time in both the indoor and outdoor areas. There is also an emphasis placed on building respectful relationships and partnerships with families and whānau. The teaching team has a strong commitment to the all-round wellbeing, care and development of children.

A team of three qualified teachers and one teacher currently in training are led by the centre supervisor. Teachers make good links in programme planning to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. Children benefit from the centre’s good teacher to child ratio.

The centre currently has plans and resource consent to extend and enlarge the centre. This will allow the owner to increase the roll and reconfigure and modernise the premises in ways that benefit children. It will also be an opportunity to make some necessary improvements to work facilities for staff.

The 2013 ERO report commented on the positive relationships and good communication between teachers, children and families. It also recommended further development of programme planning, self-review, management planning, and staff appraisal. The owner and the teaching team are continuing to address these recommendations. External professional development has resulted in improvements in self review and appraisal. However, there are still some areas to be fully addressed.

The Review Findings

Inclusive and respectful relationships are evident between children, parents and staff. Teachers have good opportunities to engage with whānau daily and build partnerships with parents. Some staff speak languages other than English, which can help children to settle and feel a sense of belonging.

Children have opportunities to make choices about their play and enjoy playing and socialising together. They make friends and are at ease with each other and with adults.

Teachers are attentive and responsive to the immediate needs and preferences of children up to two years of age. Infants make choices and are encouraged to join in activities. They benefit from respectful, nurturing care from teachers and opportunities to interact with older children.

Parents speak highly of the centre’s ethos of care. A strong sense of parent support and appreciation of the centre is evident. Many staff have been with the centre for a number of years and have a deep understanding of the needs and aspirations of the local community.

Pre-entry visits are arranged to meet the individual needs of the children. As children approach school age, fortnightly transition visits are made to a local primary school.

Teachers work well together. They plan the topics and themes of the programme together and effectively promote children’s self-management skills. Teachers communicate well with each other and respond quickly to children. They are very respectful of children, they listen and provide time for children to respond and think.

Some teachers are using skilful questioning to very effectively extend children’s language development and thinking. Teachers provide a number of indoor and outdoor activity options for children including activities that promote early literacy and maths concepts.

Teachers should now consider ways to present and use equipment to better motivate and maximise children’s interest and continue to extend the complexity of children’s play.

Bicultural practices continue to develop. Professional learning opportunities and visits to the local mārae are building teachers’ understanding of and commitment to deepening their knowledge of te reo and tikanga Māori. Cultural diversity is valued and different cultural aspects are included in centre planning. Parents appreciate and value the use of te reo Māori in the programme.

Centre leaders have identified future goals that include strengthening procedures for documenting planning and assessment. New web-based portfolios have recently been introduced to better share children’s learning with whānau. This should enable teachers to record more individual learning stories that show each child’s progress, interests and growth. It would be worthwhile to review the storage and access that children have to their learning stories. Consideration should be given to making it easier for children to share, discuss and revisit their learning.

Strategic priorities are to:

  • undertake a stocktake, and review the use of resources and play equipment available to children
  • plan how teachers can make better use of equipment and resources to motivate, engage and challenge children’s learning
  • further develop learning stories so that they more clearly show children’s individual interests and progress over time.

Self review is valued by the team. Following professional development, considerable progress has been made to improve centre self review. A well-documented review of science has recently been completed. A number of policies and procedures have also been reviewed using staff and whānau feedback.

Key Next Steps

ERO and the centre owner agree that key next steps for the centre include:

  • strengthening planning and evaluation processes to promote children’s thinking and complex play
  • providing leadership professional development opportunities for the centre supervisor
  • refining the centre’s strategic planning documents to prioritise children’s learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Riverhills Early Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

To improve current practice, service managers should:

  • review the centre’s procedures for record keeping with staff to ensure nappy changes, medication and accidents are accurately and consistently recorded
  • ensure cleaning practices are monitored across all areas of the centre
  • review procedures to ensure potential hazards outdoors are identified and improvements are promptly actioned.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS1, HS28, PF4, PF5

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Riverhills Early Learning Centre will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

22 February 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Pakuranga, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

25105

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

25 children, including up to 2 aged under 2

Service roll

33

Gender composition

Girls 20 Boys 13

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Asian

Indian

other

5

13

8

4

3

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:2

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:7

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

January 2016

Date of this report

22 February 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Supplementary Review

March 2013

 

Supplementary Review

January 2012

 

Supplementary Review

November 2010

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.