Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1

Education institution number:
47004
Service type:
Homebased Network
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
6
Telephone:
Address:

Unit F 4 Donnelly Street, Hastings

View on map

Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1 are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whāngai Establishing

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 
Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whāngai Establishing

Whakaū Embedding

2 Context of the Service

Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1 is one of seven homebased and four centre-based services in the Rockmybaby organisation. It operates from a head office in Havelock North, Hawke’s Bay. In this network, nanny educators work in children’s homes. A qualified teacher visits regularly to support the provision of a homebased curriculum based on Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.

3 Summary of findings

Children experience a curriculum that is influenced by their interests, developing capabilities as learners and a termly group curriculum focus. Excursions increasingly provide opportunities for children and educators to connect with each other and the local community.

Educators, and the visiting teacher, have established strong respectful relationships with children and families. A variety of communication and information sharing opportunities exist. They work closely with whānau to progress the learning and development of children with additional needs. The service is yet to respond to parent aspirations for their child’s learning to grow learning-focused partnerships. This includes continuing to improve how well the documented curriculum reflects individual children’s languages and cultures.

Educators are supported by a visiting teacher to recognise and respond to children’s ways of learning. Increased use of the learning outcomes of Te Whāriki is required in curriculum evaluation, to help teachers and educators identify what is working well for individuals and groups of children. Provision of a localised curriculum is in the early stages of development. This includes monitoring children’s assessment records to show how the planned bicultural curriculum, including te reo Māori, is implemented for children.

Governance and management have a strong focus on improvement. Well-considered induction and professional development systems provide opportunities for educators and visiting teachers to grow their capability. Self-review and internal evaluation systems are implemented.

Leaders demonstrate an increased understanding of equity and the importance of focusing on outcomes for children over time. This knowledge is in the early stages of being integrated across organisational processes and practices.

4 Improvement actions

Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1 will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Continue to grow visiting teacher and educators’ practices in documenting how the curriculum provided is responsive to parent aspirations and children’s languages and cultures.
  • Continue to focus on identifying outcomes for children as a result of changes made through internal evaluation processes.
  • Undertake and document internal evaluation that focuses on how well changes made are impacting on equitable outcomes for children.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1 completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

6 Actions for Compliance 

The service has provided ERO with information to show the following non-compliances have been addressed:

  • Ensuring equipment, premises and facilities are checked every day of operation for hazards to children.
  • Having evidence that a supervision plan specific to every excursion is developed and implemented.
  • Maintaining a written supervision plan, specific for each premises that includes the full requirements of the criterion.

[Licensing Criteria for Home-based Education and Care Services 2008, HS11, HS14, HS34].

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

27 February 2024

7 About the Early Childhood Service 

Early Childhood Service Name Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1
Profile Number47004
LocationAuckland
Service type Home-based service
Number licensed for 40 children, including up to 40 aged under 2
Service roll14
Review team on siteNovember 2023 
Date of this report27 February 2024
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, September 2019

Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1 - 06/09/2019

1 Evaluation of Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1

How well placed is Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1 to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1 is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1 is licensed to provide all-day education and care for up to 40 children, including 20 aged under two years. The 41 children currently enrolled are from diverse cultural backgrounds.

The Rockmybaby service has been operating since July 2016, initially in the Hawkes Bay region. It is led by the owner and senior visiting teacher. They work together in this network to provide support and guidance for visiting teachers, educators and nannies in the Auckland region. The maximum group size for each in-home provider is four children. Service leaders and all visiting teachers are qualified early childhood teachers.

The philosophy of the service prioritises nurturing, respectful relationships and life-long learning. Te Tiriti o Waitangi is acknowledged as a guiding document.

This is the first ERO review of this Auckland network. Previous ERO reviews of Rockmybaby networks have noted the organisational focus on ongoing improvement, which continues to be evident. Areas for development in previous reviews included assessment and planning for individual children, bicultural practice and internal evaluation. There has been good progress in these areas.

The Review Findings

Small group sizes allow each educator/nanny to form respectful, positive relationships with children in their care. Visiting teachers and educators/nannies know children well as learners. They identify children's individual interests and strengths and collaboratively plan how they might respond. Children experience a wide range of learning opportunities, both indoors and outdoors. Excursions into the local community are a feature of programmes for children.

Infants and toddlers benefit from one-to-one responsive interactions and unhurried programmes. Educators/nannies follow the child's lead and are attuned to children's rhythms. Planned larger group activities foster interactions amongst children and support their developing social competence.

The service is inclusive and welcoming to all children and their whānau. Leaders, educators/nannies are responsive to children's languages and cultures.

Service leaders provide resources for educators to deepen their knowledge of te ao Māori. Educators/nannies are developing their confidence to use these more extensively with children in their care. Leaders have identified bicultural practice as an ongoing area for development.

Visiting teachers' visits and written feedback support educators/nannies to develop their teaching practices. Together they maintain individual 'learning journeys' for each child that document their wonderings, creativity and curiosity well. Written feedback is shared with whānau. Consideration could now be given to how these processes enhance educators', nannies' and whānau knowledge of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.

Leaders have established a policy framework that guides practice. An established cycle of review ensures policies are regularly updated. An annual plan links with a detailed strategic plan and promotes progress towards the service's strategic goals. Internal evaluation and appraisal processes encourage leaders, educators and children to be lifelong learners. Collaboration and shared understandings of quality across the leadership team have established an organisational culture of ongoing improvement.

Key Next Steps

Service leaders agree that their key next steps for improvement include:

  • gathering and responding to whānau aspirations to establish learning centred partnerships with whānau
  • continuing to refine and deepen internal evaluation, including a focus on evaluating the impact of teaching practices on children's learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Rockmybaby Homebased Auckland S1 completed an ERO Home-based Education and Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services Northern

Northern Region

6 September 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Home-based Education and Care Service

LocationAuckland
Ministry of Education profile number47004
Institution typeHomebased Network
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for40 children, including up to 20 aged under 2
Service roll41
Standard or Quality FundedStandard
Gender compositionGirls 23 Boys 18
Ethnic compositionMāori 
NZ European/Pākehā 
other ethnic groups
2
29
10
Number of qualified coordinators in the network1
Required ratios of staff educators to childrenUnder 21:2
Over 21:4
Review team on siteAugust 2019
Date of this report6 September 2019
Most recent ERO report(s)No previous ERO reports

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to the draft methodology for ERO reviews in Home-based Education and Care Services: July 2014

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed
  • Well placed
  • Requires further development
  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.