Simply Kids Preschool

Education institution number:
10227
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Telephone:
Address:

45 Waverley Street, Onerahi, Whangarei

View on map

Simply Kids Preschool

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Simply Kids Preschool is a privately owned and operated centre in a semi-rural area. The service provider/centre manager leads a team of two qualified staff and one unqualified staff. Approximately half of the children attending are Māori.

Summary of Review Findings

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions that enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. The service curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Children have opportunities to develop knowledge and an understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. There is a sufficient quantity and variety of equipment appropriate for the learning and abilities of the children attending.

The service provider needs to monitor that processes and practices are implemented and maintained to meet regulatory requirements.

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • documenting a procedure for the hygienic laundering on-site of linen used by children or adults at the service (HS2)
  • ensuring heavy furniture, fixtures, and equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury are appropriately secured (HS6)
  • developing a written emergency plan that includes a variety of emergency situations, details of roles and responsibilities that will apply during an emergency and communication plan for parents (HS7)
  • carrying out evaluation of emergency drills that inform the annual review of the service’s emergency plan (HS8)
  • documenting a procedure for monitoring children’s sleep that includes children being checked for warmth, breathing, and general wellbeing, and ensuring adults check each sleeping child every 5 to 10 minutes for warmth, breathing and general wellbeing (HS9)
  • checking equipment, premises and facilities daily for hazards that include all considerations of hazards as part of the HS12 requirement (HS12)
  • documenting a record of excursions that includes risk assessments undertaken for regular and special excursions (HS17)
  • having evidence that the sleep room used by children is kept at a comfortable temperature no lower than 16°C (at 500mm above the floor) while children are attending (HS24)
  • documenting a procedure to ensure that children who are unwell at the service, are kept at a safe distance from other children to minimise the spread of infection (HS26)
  • documenting a procedure outlining the service’s response to incidents and maintaining records of incidents and illnesses that occurred at the service (HS27)
  • ensuring that the written child protection policy meets the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014 (HS31)
  • installing a mirror in the nappy changing area to allow some visibility from another area of the service (PF25)
  • documenting a procedure for induction and ensuring that there is a system for teacher appraisal (GMA7)
  • ensuring all children’s workers who have access to children are safety checked in accordance with the Children’s Act 2014 and that there is a written procedure for safety checking that meets the requirements of that act (GMA7A)
  • developing a budget that includes leave entitlements and ongoing costs for purchasing new equipment (GMA8)
  • ensuring that attendance records are marked by staff on a twice daily basis (GMA11).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

12 May 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name Simply Kids Preschool
Profile Number 10227
Location Onerahi, Whangarei

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

28 children, including up to 8 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%+

Service roll

24

Ethnic composition

Māori 11
NZ European/Pākehā 9
other ethnic groups 4

Review team on site

March 2021

Date of this report

12 May 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, September 2016

Education Review, June 2013

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Simply Kids Preschool - 21/09/2016

1 Evaluation of Simply Kids Preschool

How well placed is Simply Kids Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Simply Kids Preschool is a privately owned, semi-rural, all day education and care centre. It caters for up to 28 children, including eight children under two years of age. The majority of the children attend less than a full week.

The centre’s philosophy emphasises children learning about themselves and their place in the world. Building relationships, celebrating cultural diversity and responsiveness to children and whānau are key values that underpin practice. Education and care is guided by Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. The extensive outdoor area promotes children's play. An enclosed space for a variety of small animals provides opportunities for children to learn about farm animals.

The owner/ manager employs four registered teachers, one provisionally registered teacher and three unqualified staff. Most teachers are part time and work on a roster of approximately three days a week.

The 2013 ERO report recognised many good aspects of the centre, including strong tuakana teina relationships among children, and the attractive learning environment. These aspects are still evident. Since the report the centre owner and teachers have made positive changes to the centre’s programme and the philosophy. Further work is required in planning long and short-term goals that clearly identify priorities and associated goals towards achieving the centre’s vision.

The Review Findings

Children in this centre are happy and demonstrate a strong sense of belonging. Respectful, responsive relationships and interactions underpin the centre’s warm and welcoming tone. Teachers know children and their whānau well. Parents value the team’s strong commitment to supporting the needs of all families. Children with special learning needs are well supported in their learning and external support is provided when it is required.

Children are friendly and confident learners. They have fun, are encouraged to explore resources and are able to make choices about how and where they play. They initiate their own learning and enjoy imaginative play. Teachers could now put a stronger focus on empowering children to take increased responsibility for the wellbeing of themselves and others.

The environment provides opportunities for mixed-age play. Teachers care for infants and toddlers in a small separate space within the comfortable indoor learning area. Gentle, respectful teacher practice has allowed strong relationships to develop between children and their teachers.

Teachers make links to children’s home experiences and follow their interests to promote learning. Teachers ask children questions and wait patiently for them to respond. This respectful approach gives children time to think, helps them to develop oral language skills, and supports their wellbeing. It would now be timely for all teachers to consider ways to extend children's thinking and learning.

Learning programmes have a strong focus on increasing children's connections with nature. The centre is well resourced to engage the interest of children. Wall displays reflect the children’s learning and programme activities.

Teachers are committed to extending bicultural practice. They use basic te reo Māori in interactions with children and have learnt about the history of the Onerahi area. Cultural celebrations are evident in displays, and centre resources provide opportunities to extend children's knowledge of Māori culture.

Children’s portfolios are well used by children and their families. They provide a valued record of children’s learning journeys. There are some good examples of children's learning being extended.

The owner/manager promotes an inclusive and caring leadership model and supports a collective approach to teaching and learning. Teachers work collaboratively, sharing strengths. They have a strong commitment to continuously improving outcomes for children.

Recently reviewed policy and procedures provide good frameworks for centre operation. To enable the owner and teachers to achieve their shared vision of a high performing centre they could use current information about quality early childhood practices as they review their practice. In order to meet the Education Council requirements for endorsing teacher registration, further work is required.

Key Next Steps

ERO suggested and the centre owner/manager agreed that in order to sustain continuous improvement the next steps for centre management include:

  • strengthening self-review processes to include outcomes for children

  • developing an annual plan, and aligning this to the strategic plan to guide centre practices

  • consistently evaluating the effectiveness of the programme in order to further support children's learning

implementing robust, improvement focused staff appraisal, and including appraisal of management by an external appraiser.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Simply Kids Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Simply Kids Preschool will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

21 September 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Onerahi, Whangarei

Ministry of Education profile number

10227

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

28 children, including up to 8 aged under 2

Service roll

27

Gender composition

Girls 17, Boys 10

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

other

12

9

6

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:6

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2016

Date of this report

21 September 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

June 2013

Education Review

March 2010

Education Review

March 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.