Little Fantails

Education institution number:
34120
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
43
Telephone:
Address:

83 Bridge Street, Tokoroa

View on map

St Marks Community Preschool

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for St Marks Community Preschool are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whāngai Establishing

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 

Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whāngai Establishing
Whāngai Establishing

2 Context of the Service

St Marks Community Preschool is a not-for-profit, community-based service. It provides full-day education and care for children from birth to school age in two separate age-based settings. Governance is provided by the parent board and leaders from the adjoining St Mark’s Church. 

3 Summary of findings

Children’s learning and development are well supported by leaders and teachers who provide a curriculum where the following are evident:

  • Child agency, independence, perseverance, self-help skills and friendship, are fostered and strengthened. This enhances children’s social and emotional skills and capabilities.

  • Infants and toddlers learn in a calm, unhurried environment where their well-being is nurtured. A range of equitable practices are used that enhance relationships and build upon teachers knowing the child well. This increases attachment, a sense of belonging and the child’s further development.

  • Children with additional learning needs are fully included in the programme. Relationships with external support agencies and additional teaching resource is put in place to support these children. This positively promotes the extension of on-going learning.

Some practices are in place for Māori children and their whānau that supports their wellbeing and sense of belonging. The service celebrates cultural events, such as Matariki. It is at the beginning stages of embedding te reo and tikanga, local curriculum and iwi knowledge into practices. A focus on all children’s own unique languages, cultures and identity is yet to be applied.

The service’s organisational conditions are effective in promoting children’s valued learning. Teachers and leaders engage in professional learning and growth-cycles. A new planning process is beginning to be embedded but is not yet including parent aspirations. Evaluation systems are in place but are not being fully implemented to ensure continuous improvement. Leaders and those in governance roles work collaboratively to promote equity and well-being for all. Effective conditions grow capacity and improve the learning and development of children.

4 Improvement actions

St Marks Community Preschool will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • purposefully respond to the identities, languages, and cultures of children and their whānau

  • intentionally gather and use parent’s aspirations throughout planning and assessment processes to enhance all children’s learning and development

  • teachers and leaders to engage deliberately and systematically in internal evaluation to enable positive outcomes for groups of children

  • explicitly reflect the valued learning outcomes of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, across all systems and processes.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of St Marks Community Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management, and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Phil Cowie
Director Review and Improvement Services (Central)
Central Region | Te Tai Pūtahi Nui

15 June 2022 

6 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name

St Marks Community Preschool

Profile Number

34120

Location

Tokoroa

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

35 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

50

Ethnic composition

Māori 15, NZ European/Pākehā 30, Other ethnic groups 5

Review team on site

April 2022

Date of this report

15 June 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, November 2018; Education Review, November 2015

St Marks Community Preschool - 14/11/2018

1 Evaluation of St Marks Community Preschool

How well placed is St Marks Community Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

St Mark’s Community Preschool is located in the South Waikato township of Tokoroa. It provides full-day education and care for children from birth to school age in two separate age-based settings. The roll of 58 includes 28 Māori children.

Through the philosophy, kaiako aim to promote Christian values, encourage children to feel safe and secure, follow their own learning pathway and develop a love of learning. The philosophy references the importance of the Treaty of Waitangi and opportunities for children to develop understanding of their own and other cultures.

Nearly all staff are qualified or completing qualifications to teach in early childhood education. Teacher professional learning and research projects have been about positive guidance for children, health and safety, assessment and evaluation, children with additional learning needs, literacy and mathematics, and transition to school.

The centre operates under the oversight of a management committee comprised of representatives from St Mark’s Church, centre parents and the teaching team. Since ERO’s 2015 review, a new centre manager has been appointed and there have been some changes to the mostly long-standing teaching team. There has been significant upgrade of the outdoor environments and ongoing centre resourcing.

ERO’s last report in November 2015 identified areas to strengthen practice relating to incorporating children’s language, culture and identity in the programme, teacher reflections and evaluation, and closer alignment between the centre’s philosophy, annual and strategic plans.

The Review Findings

Nurturing, trusting and responsive relationships and interactions between children and staff are highly evident. Teachers understand the concepts of aroha and manaakitanga including their obligations to whānau Māori. This helps them to provide appropriate care and education for Māori and other children. Children up to two years of age benefit from their relationships with consistent and familiar adults in a small group setting. They enjoy frequent opportunities for independent exploration. Transitions from home and within the centre are well managed and responsive to individual children. Teachers’ emphasis on developing children’s confidence, independence and social competence supports children's learning and their positive transitions to school.

Teachers’ engagement in long-term internal evaluation is resulting in a more deliberate response to the cultural identity of children and families. Strengthened practices and opportunities include incorporating te reo and tikanga Māori, resourcing of play areas, environmental design and developing links with the local Māori, Pacific and Asian communities.

Children experience a broad and rich curriculum. They confidently lead their own learning through self-chosen play and exploration. The programme is unhurried and allows time for sustained and uninterrupted play. The environment is well resourced, spacious and offers levels of challenge for all age groups. There are many opportunities for children to make connections and extend their interests in the centre and wider community. Literacy, mathematics, science and technology are well integrated in authentic contexts for children.

Rich records of children’s learning capture their interest, dispositions and strengths. Continuity of learning is evident in assessments and there are some good examples that show children’s language, culture and identity. Further development is needed to more consistently document individual goals and planning, and to strengthen the role of children and parents as partners in assessment for learning.

Centre leadership effectively builds capability within the service to promote positive learning outcomes for all children. A recent priority for the centre has been to establish an organisational culture based on respectful relationships and trust. Parents and staff feel valued and appreciate strengthened communication and the opportunities to be heard. Emergent leadership is fostered by recognising individual skills and empowering all staff to contribute to the life of the centre and children’s learning.

A newly developed appraisal system sets clear expectations and supports teachers in their professional growth and learning. There is regular mentoring, coaching and discussion about teaching practice. Further consideration should deepen teacher reflections and the quality of individual development goals.

Centre governance and management promote shared values that are underpinned by Christian beliefs. Leaders maintain a strong focus on the rights of all children to a quality, inclusive early childhood education. Equitable opportunities for children and families are central to decision making. The centre works effectively with external agencies to support children with additional needs and their families. A focus for the new centre manager has been to clarify and strengthen aspects of centre operations. Management recognises the need to continue to rationalise and review centre policies and procedures.

Key Next Steps

ERO identified and centre management agree that the following next steps will be important for ongoing centre development.

The centre philosophy should be reviewed as part of a planned approach to deepening teachers' understanding and implementation of the revised Te Whāriki.

Strategic planning should be strengthened. Important considerations include:

  • more specific goals and indicators of success that focus on outcomes for children

  • alignment between centre priorities and teachers' appraisal goals

  • regular reporting and monitoring of progress against centre goals throughout the year.

The appraisal process for the centre manager needs further development. This should include:

  • a more specific focus on the professional leadership aspect of this role

  • quality goals to enhance professional learning and practice

  • access to a suitable external appraiser with in-depth knowledge of leadership and current theories of teaching and learning in early childhood education.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of St Marks Community Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of St Marks Community Preschool will be in three years.

Adrienne Fowler

Director Review and Improvement Services

Te Tai Miringa - Waikato / Bay of Plenty Region

14 November 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Tokoroa

Ministry of Education profile number

34120

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

35 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

58

Gender composition

Girls 33 Boys 25

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other

28
22
8

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:6

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

October 2018

Date of this report

14 November 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

November 2015

Supplementary Review

July 2012

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.