Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool

Education institution number:
46081
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Samoan ECE service
Total roll:
36
Telephone:
Address:

53 Raglan Street, Mangere East, Auckland

View on map

Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO found the service was taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool is a bilingual Samoan service governed by Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool Trust. A centre manager leads a team of five qualified teachers and support staff. Children play and learn in two aged-based rooms. The majority of children attending the centre are of Samoan heritage.

Summary of Review Findings

The curriculum is inclusive, and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. It provides children with a range of experiences and opportunities to enhance and extend their learning and development, individually and in groups. The service curriculum is consistent with Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum framework.

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. A philosophy statement guides operations expressing the service’s beliefs, values, and attitudes.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include service leaders and teachers:

  • providing further opportunities for the perspectives parents and whānau have about their children to be shared and responded to in the curriculum

  • improving the extent to which assessment information shows children’s progress and learning over time.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Filivaifale Jason Swann
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki
21 October 2022 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool

Profile Number

46081

Location

Mangere, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

60 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

60

Review team on site

August 2022

Date of this report

21 October 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, May 2019; Education Review, October 2015

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool - 15/05/2019

1 Evaluation of Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool

How well placed is Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool, in Mangere East, is a bilingual Samoan centre that provides education and care for 60 children, including up to 15 aged under two years. Most children attending are Samoan, and there are small numbers from other Pacific groups. The preschool provides separate spaces for younger and older children, who have opportunities to interact and participate together at centre and church events.

The centre operates under the Taeaofou I Puaseisei Trust and the Christian Congregational Church of Samoa. In 2018 the trust opened another centre, Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool - Winthrop, in the same neighbourhood. A centre manager takes responsibility for the day-to-day management and leadership of both centres. Since the 2015 ERO review, there has been an increase in the number of qualified teachers. Low staff turnover has helped teachers to build close relationships with families over time.

The centre's purpose is to develop Pacific children's cultural pride and identity, emphasising the Samoan language and culture, and Christian values. Its philosophy statement acknowledges the importance of Te Tiriti o Waitangi, and Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.

ERO's 2015 report included recommendations to improve teachers' capability through professional learning, responsiveness to children's strengths and interests, and strategies for extending children's thinking. It also identified the need to strengthen early literacy and mathematics through the programme and environment. While some progress has been made, these areas continue to be priorities for further development.

The Review Findings

The programme and teachers' interactions with children reinforce children's cultural identity and sense of belonging at the preschool. The centre manager and her staff ensure that gagana and aganu'u Samoa are integral parts of the daily programme. Children have opportunities to participate in local community and church events. Nurturing care for infants and toddlers is modelled well by some teachers.

Teachers are becoming more child-focused in their programme planning, assessment and evaluation. They use a planning model that guides teachers to notice, recognise and respond to children's interests and learning. The centre manager agrees that there are some good models of assessment and planning that could be used to promote more consistent curriculum management practices.

The preschool's curriculum is currently under review. Teachers have participated in professional learning to help them to better integrate literacy and mathematics in the programme and environment. As teachers make more meaningful connections to children's learning interests, consideration needs to be given to providing learning resources that will enable children to be curious and challenge their thinking. Ongoing professional development will be essential for the teaching team to implement these changes.

The preschool has several ways to share children's learning and interests with their parents. There are interviews twice a year and an end of year report, as well as regular conversations with staff when parents drop off or pick up their children from the centre. Leaders plan to continue to grow parents' involvement and partnership in children's learning.

Members of the trust board have a strong commitment to the cultural philosophy and growth of the centre. They value the preschool's role in providing a service for the local Samoan community and families. The preschool has good systems and processes for health and safety management. The manager reports to the trust board, and the board's meeting records show a focus on progress towards annual goals. The trust, and manager continue to develop evaluation practices. They have established a schedule for reviewing policies and procedures. Teachers' evaluation and inquiry into the effectiveness of their own practice are at an early stage of development.

Key Next Steps

Key next steps include teachers engaging with external professional development to:

  • increase their responsiveness to children's strengths and interests to promote their learning

  • improve children's access to resources that provide more challenge, and extend their thinking

  • support children to lead their own learning, and younger children to learn self-help skills

  • develop teaching practices related to current best practice and the revised Te Whāriki

  • maintain written records of their reflections on evidence for each of the Teaching Standards, and of their professional learning.

As part of the planned leadership restructure for the two centres, it will be worthwhile to clarify the roles and responsibilities of each leader in supporting and building teaching capability.

Key next steps for managers include external professional support to:

  • strengthen leadership capability

  • ensure more frequent written feedback is shared with each teacher about their individual goals and the Teaching Council Standards

  • clarify the performance appraisal policy and procedures, and the link between annual appraisal and the three yearly endorsement of teachers' practising certificates

  • implement a mentoring programme for teachers who hold provisional practising certificates.

Recommendation

The service will provide ERO with an action plan that shows how key next steps identified in this report, and actions for compliance, will be addressed. ERO will request a progress update in six months.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services Northern

Northern Region

15 May 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Mangere East, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

46081

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

60 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

58

Gender composition

Girls 32 Boys 26

Ethnic composition

Māori
Samoan
Niuean
other Pacific

1
44
4
9

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:5

Meets minimum requirements

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

February 2019

Date of this report

15 May 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

October 2015

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool - 09/10/2015

1 Evaluation of Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool

How well placed is Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

This is Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool’s first ERO report. The service operates in Mangere East under the Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool Trust and the Christian Congregation Church of Samoa. The centre became fully licensed in 2013 and operates as a bilingual Samoan preschool. It provides inclusive education and care for its culturally diverse community.

Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool is licensed for 50 children. It can have a maximum of 10 children under two years of age. The preschool provides separate spaces for the younger and older age groups.

The preschool’s philosophy aims to raise the participation and quality of education for Pacific children and to build on the local strengths of the community. It emphasises Christian values and Samoan language and culture. The preschool facilities were funded by the Ministry of Education’s Targeted Assistance for Participation initiative. The trust has plans underway to build another centre in the Mangere community.

The preschool maintains a high staff to child ratio and is committed to employing a high percentage of qualified staff. Of the six permanent teachers, one is fully registered. The centre manager is providing good support for the teaching team to develop shared understandings and practices, and to complete requirements for full registration.

The Review Findings

Children settle well on arrival. They enjoy the activities that teachers have set up. Children are confident in their culture and language. They have lots of opportunities to develop their social competence with peers and adults. Children have access to a range of choices in their play and are encouraged to lead mat time and special events at the preschool.

The preschool’s philosophy is evident in the ways that teachers have created a bilingual and Christian-based environment. Teachers are caring and respectful of children. This is especially evident for the youngest children in the preschool.

Centre managers and staff have worked hard to develop and implement sound systems and processes to operate the preschool efficiently. This progress has been achieved with the assistance of external support and the collaborative and respectful relationships between the trust, staff and the community. As a result, the centre features shared leadership and collaborative approaches that support positive outcomes for children.

The preschool has a commitment to valuing and including the diverse cultures of the community. Teachers are well supported by community members in the daily running of the centre. Teachers interact positively with children, and are welcoming and inclusive of children and their families.

Teachers provide programmes that link well to the early childhood curriculum and bible stories. They have established a balance between individual and group assessment practices, and plan and deliver a programme that is becoming more child responsive.

Self-review practices have been established. Trust members use self review to determine the centre direction and future plans. This happens through ongoing discussions between the trust and staff. Teachers use self review to gauge how well resources and routines are being used. They are developing ways to make indicators of good quality a part of their self-review practices.

Key Next Steps

The trust and teachers should continue to strengthen self-review processes so that they are better informed about how well they are achieving positive outcomes for children. Key next steps also include:

  • continuing to grow teachers’ professional capacity through professional development
  • sharing effective practice so that areas of play better extend and challenge children’s thinking
  • increasing teachers’ responsiveness to children’s interests and strengths to promote learning
  • strengthening early literacy and mathematics learning through the programme and environment.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. 

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Taeaofou I Puaseisei Preschool will be in three years. 

Graham Randell
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

9 October 2015 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Mangere, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

46081

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

48

Gender composition

Boys      28
Girls       20

Ethnic composition

Samoan
Samoan/Tongan
Fijian Indian
other

37
  5
  2
  4

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:4

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2015

Date of this report

9 October 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

No previous ERO reports

 

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.