Tai Tapu Playcentre

Education institution number:
70132
Service type:
Playcentre
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
35
Telephone:
Address:

815 Old Tai Tapu Road, Taitapu

View on map

Tai Tapu Playcentre - 12/03/2019

1 Evaluation of Tai Tapu Playcentre

How well placed is Tai Tapu Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Tai Tapu Playcentre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Tai Tapu Playcentre is within New Zealand Playcentre Federation's Upper South Island region (USIR). The playcentre operates five mornings a week and is licensed for up to 30 children, including 20 children under two. Children from birth-to-school age attend the playcentre with their parents. The playcentre currently has a roll of 37 children.

The playcentre operates out of a recently repurposed hall located in the small rural community of Tai Tapu. It is close to Tai Tapu, Halswell and Ladbrooks schools.

The playcentre's philosophy states it is a 'family-run playcentre where parent education is promoted alongside children's learning' and has a strong focus on 'families learning together'. All parents and extended family members are encouraged to participate in achieving these aims.

The playcentre has three co-ordinators who are trained early childhood teachers. The day-to-day planning and operation of the playcentre are carried out by parents who collectively form part of the distributed leadership team. There are regular visits and ongoing support from a Centre Support Worker (CSW) and Centre Administrator (CA).

Tai Tapu Playcentre is an active member of the Ngā Mātāpuna o Ngā Pakihi Kāhui Ako.

The Review Findings

Children and adults benefit from caring, respectful relationships. The inclusive culture is very welcoming for parents and children and supports the focus on building relationships within the playcentre and with the local community. Parents work well as a collective and there are good systems in place for ensuring the smooth operation of the playcentre.

Children and parents are supported in their learning. Playcentre co-ordinators have created strong learning partnerships with parents giving them confidence as first teachers of their children. Parents are developing a greater awareness of their children's development. Children's learning benefits from purposeful planning which clearly reflects their interests and their parents' aspirations. Children's learning stories and profile books are readily available so children and parents can read and revisit learning.

Children enjoy and engage in a rich programme based on real-life experiences, the playcentre's rural setting and its wider community. They and their parents involve themselves in a variety of activities within and beyond the playcentre. Positive interactions between children and adults develop children's confidence to engage with others and to be independent learners.

The indoor and outdoor environments are spacious, very well resourced and well organised. Children choose what they want to do and have easy access to age-appropriate resources. They play well alongside and with their peers and adults.

The leadership team is improvement focused. There is have a useful internal evaluation framework which is leading to shifts in practices and improved outcomes for children. Internal evaluation topics respond to identified areas, such as transitions into the playcentre by new and returning parents, and children. These topics are linked to long and short term planning, the playcentre philosophy and the Playcentre Federation philosophy.

A well-thought strategic plan clearly outlines the playcentre's priorities for the future. Parents and leaders need to also consider succession planning to ensure the smooth running of the service in the future.

Key Next Steps

The key next steps, with the support of the CSW, are to:

  • further develop internal evaluation practices, including evaluating recent initiatives and the impact of these on children's learning
  • incorporate te ao Māori perspectives into day-to-day activities and children's learning
  • build parent capability in using Te Whāriki (2017), the Early Childhood Curriculum and determine priorities for learning to give greater definition to the playcentre's local curriculum.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Tai Tapu Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review and Improvement Services Southern

Southern Region

12 March 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Tai Tapu, Canterbury

Ministry of Education profile number

70132

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 20 aged under 2

Service roll

46

Gender composition

Boys: 23

Girls: 23

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Other ethnicities

7
36
3

Percentage of qualified teachers

Parent-led cooperative

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

November 2018

Date of this report

12 March 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

July 2014

Education Review

June 2010

Education Review

April 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Tai Tapu Playcentre - 16/07/2014

1 Evaluation of Tai Tapu Playcentre

How well placed is Tai Tapu Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Tai Tapu Playcentre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Tai Tapu Playcentre operates under the guidance of the Canterbury Playcentre Association. The playcentre is a parent cooperative with parents encouraged to be involved in all aspects of the programme and centre operation.

Tai Tapu Playcentre operates five morning sessions a week. It is located in the Tai Tapu Hall. The hall is safe to occupy but sustained damage in the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes. The future of the hall is uncertain. The parents and the association are working with the Ministry of Education and the Selwyn Council to ensure the playcentre has suitable premises.

This review was part of a cluster review of seven playcentres in the Canterbury Playcentre Association.

The Review Findings

Children learn and socialise in a well organised and presented playcentre programme. Many of the adults have been involved in the centre for a number of years and willingly share their skills and knowledge of playcentre and the best ways for children to learn.

The playcentre provides a warm, friendly and inviting environment for children and adults. Children are well supported by adults who have a good knowledge of each child and effectively use a range of approaches to help children develop their thinking, problem solving and social skills.

The coordinators and parents have clear and well understood roles and responsibilities for the programme and the administration of the centre. Adults' skills and interests are well used to strengthen the programme and ensure the smooth operation of the centre.

The environment is well resourced and provides well for the infants, toddlers and children up to school age. Adults have made appropriate use of self review to improve the provisions for under- two-year-old children and extend the interests of children near school age. Literacy and numeracy are integrated into the programme in ways that engage children in meaningful learning.

Leadership is actively promoted. The three coordinators completed their training at this centre. Children’s comments are regularly sought as part of the centre’s self review. Older children willingly look after and include younger children in their play.

Canterbury Playcentre Association

The association has effective systems and practices for monitoring health and safety, and parent involvement in the centres. The association’s support team visits assist centre staff to meet the association's expectations for the daily operation of the centre.

The association centre support team provides a vital link between the parents and the association. In centres where this link is strong, ERO found the centres received good quality targeted support. In these centres the coordinators and parents worked effectively as a parent cooperative. They had well defined roles and responsibilities and were able to provide evidence that the centre’s programme was extending children’s learning.

Key Next Steps for the Canterbury Playcentre Association

The association is undertaking major restructuring. A new manager was appointed in April 2014. The playcentre philosophy provides a good foundation for the association to build its vision and make the changes for the organisation and its centres. Plans to support the achievement of this vision have yet to be put in place.

Next steps for the association should include:

  • clearly documenting the association’s future goals, plans and progress
  • making clear links from the association’s strategic plans to centre plans, and association and centre self review
  • strengthening the support provided to centre support team members through more targeted professional development and robust appraisal
  • providing ongoing documented feedback from the centre support team to parent groups about the quality of teaching and learning.

Key next steps for Tai Tapu Playcentre

The association, centre parents and ERO agree that the next steps include:

  • clearly documenting future goals, plans and progress to ensure the ongoing improvement of the programme and learning outcomes for all children
  • strengthening self review by developing a better understanding of the process and the focus on learning outcomes for children
  • reviewing assessment and planning processes to help adults identify children’s learning and the ways that adults can help children with their learning
  • strengthening the focus on Māori achieving success as Māori
  • making closer links between coordinators’ appraisals, centre goals and learning outcomes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the management of Tai Tapu Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • administration
  • health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial and property management.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Tai Tapu Playcentre will be in three years.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services Southern Region

16 July 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Canterbury

Ministry of Education profile number

70132

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Centres) Regulations 1998

Number licensed for

28 children, including up to 8 aged under two

Service roll

30

Gender composition

Boys 17 Girls 13

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

0

30

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2014

Date of this report

16 July 2014

Most recent ERO reports

Education Review

June 2010

 

Education Review

April 2007

 

Education Review

May 2004

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.