Taikura Rudolf Steiner School

Taikura Rudolf Steiner School - 11/11/2019

School Context

Taikura Rudolf Steiner School is a co-educational, state integrated school located in Hastings for students from six to eighteen years of age. The current roll of 389 includes 17% of students who identify as Māori and a small number of those with Pacific heritage. Since the June 2016 ERO report, a new principal and deputy principal have been appointed. An elected board of trustees and a proprietors’ trust board provide stewardship of the school.

The school is organised into the lower school (classes 1 to 7) and the high school (classes 8 to 12). There is a close relationship with two local Rudolf Steiner kindergartens that most students have attended. The curriculum is informed by both the Waldorf Curriculum and The New Zealand Curriculum (NZC). Assessment of learning in the lower school is in relation to the Waldorf learning steps, aligned to the NZC. The school offers qualifications on the New Zealand Qualifications Framework Levels 1, 2 and 3 through the New Zealand Steiner Certificates (NZSC). These qualifications are managed by the Steiner Education Development Trust on behalf of the Federation of Rudolf Steiner Waldorf Schools Aotearoa New Zealand.

The school states that it provides an education based on spiritual and scientific insights into child development. The special character reflects the educational philosophies of Rudolf Steiner.

The school has specific targets to lift achievement in the lower school in mathematics, comprehension and writing.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, schoolwide information about outcomes for students in:

  • reading, writing and mathematics
  • New Zealand Certificate in Steiner Education.

The school is a member of the Steiner Waldorf Kāhui Ako.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

Trends indicate that outcomes for all students are moving strongly towards being equitable and excellent.

School data for 2018, shows that most students in the lower school achieved at or above expectation in reading, writing and mathematics, as measured by the Steiner Learning Steps. Māori student achievement is comparable to that of Pākehā students in mathematics and writing, with some disparity for Māori learners in reading. Boys and girls achieve at similar levels.

School data shows achievement has improved over time for all students, except for Māori students in reading and this declined slightly in 2018. Pacific students achieved at similar rates to Pākehā learners in 2018.

High school achievement information shows that most students achieve the New Zealand Certificate of Steiner Education (NZCSE) at all three levels. In 2018, a large majority of students gained either a highly commended or distinction endorsement at Level 1. Almost half gain an endorsement at Level 2 and most gained an endorsement at Level 3. All students who gained Level 3 also gained University Entrance.

Longitudinal data shows that disparity in achievement between males and females has decreased and achievement at Levels 1 and 2 has improved. Most Māori students achieve well.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

Accelerated learning is evident in reading, writing and mathematics in the lower school, including for those Māori and Pacific students who need this. In 2018, all students accelerated to reach expected levels.

In the high school, all students who were identified as being at risk at the beginning of high school were effectively accelerated to gain either Level 2 or 3 NZCSE in 2018.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Students have a curriculum that successfully upholds the principles of the Steiner curriculum alongside the key components of The New Zealand Curriculum. The lower school curriculum has identified aims for learning and growth at each level and these are closely linked to the developmental stages of children. High school students receive clear information about content and the skills required in the various curriculum areas to enable informed choices to support their success and educational pathway. Te reo Māori is an established part of the integrated curriculum delivery.

Students learn in an inclusive and caring environment. Positive relationships between students and with teachers encourage a strong sense of belonging. Each student is well known by all staff and this contributes to each student’s development as capable and confident learners. A wide range of opportunities engage students in learning.

A range of appropriate assessment tools is used to monitor and track individual achievement. Achievement information is also well used for detailed planning that supports the specific learning needs of each student, including those with additional needs.

Students with additional needs are extensively supported to enable them to achieve. Relevant support staff, agencies and specialists are engaged by the school to support individual student development. Teachers work very closely with each student and family to implement targeted strategies. Progress for these students is closely tracked and shared with families. Identified students with higher needs are making progress against the goals in their individual education plans.

Parents and whānau are welcomed and involved in school activities as respected and valued partners in learning. Opportunities for parents to engage in workshops to grow understanding about Steiner practices are further building the reciprocal partnership. There are many opportunities for parents to provide the school with feedback about school priorities. Parents receive detailed information about their child’s learning and progress. There is strong support for the school, particularly from those whose children have additional needs. Parents who met with ERO value the many rich opportunities available to their children.

Teachers are supported to grow professionally through targeted learning and development and the appraisal process. Culturally responsive practices have been given priority and these are guided by the school’s He Reo Ora strategy. The He Reo Puawai – Te Reo Māori Curriculum, developed and implemented by Steiner schools has provided the foundation for this work.

The small, newly established leadership team works effectively to align systems and make ongoing improvements across the school. The roles and responsibilities of the Proprietors Trust and the Trust Board are clear. The alignment of strategic and annual plans is being actioned.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Achievement targets need to be sharpened to focus more explicitly on students whose learning needs acceleration. This focus should enable trustees to make informed decisions about resourcing to promote excellence and equity. Procedures for learning support for both lower and high school students need to be clear for all staff.

The leadership team acknowledge the need to further develop a shared understanding about best practice for expected curriculum delivery to promote consistency of practice across the school. The school is beginning to develop its localised curriculum.

The board needs to improve in its accountability and improvement functions. It has the collective capacity to do so, with leadership from the board chair. Recently introduced board processes are yet to be fully implemented. To ensure board effectiveness, with focus on equity and excellence in student outcomes, trustees need to build on and implement recently developed systems and processes. This will enable the board to review and reflect on their effectiveness as a board in their stewardship role.

3 Other Matters

Provision for international students

The school is a signatory to the Education (Pastoral Care of International Students) Code of Practice 2016 (the Code) established under section 238F of the Education Act 1989. The school has attested that it complies with all aspects of the Code.

No international students were enrolled at the time of the ERO review.

4 Board Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration and certification
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.

5 ERO’s Overall Judgement

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO’s overall evaluation judgement of Taikura Rudolf Steiner School’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Well placed.

ERO will maintain an ongoing relationship with the school to build capacity and evaluate progress.

ERO’s Framework: Overall Findings and Judgement Tool derived from School Evaluation Indicators: Effective Practice for Improvement and Learner Success is available on ERO’s website.

6 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • leadership that works cohesively to promote excellence and equity

  • learning environments that promote equity and achievement

  • learning partnerships that fully involve parents and whānau.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are in:

  • its localised curriculum and shared understanding of best practice curriculum delivery through the school’s stated Steiner principles
  • stewardship to keep up to date with statutory responsibilities and more sharply focus on excellence and equity.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified non-compliance in relation to personnel management.

In order to address this, the board of trustees must:

  • ensure records are kept on site that meet requirements in terms of background checks of new employees.
    [The Children’s Act 2014]

Areas for improved compliance practice

The board is in the process of reviewing all policies and procedures for alignment and to fully implement an ongoing cycle of regular review. It is essential that this process is completed to bring additional rigour to the policy framework and ensure that all policies are current, useful and systematically reviewed. The work on financial management should be given priority.

To improve current practice, the board of trustees should ensure full implementation of the following:

  • policy framework for financial management
  • annual assessment of the principal against all professional standards for principals
  • internal procedures for receiving and dealing with information about serious wrong doing, after a review of these.

Additionally, the board should:

  • include a specific response to pandemic planning in school procedures
  • be familiar with the requirements of the updated Ministry of Education Guidelines for Registered Schools in New Zealand Schools on the use of Physical Restraint and the Guidelines for the Surrender and Retention of Property and Searches
  • be aware of the requirements of the Health and Safety at Work Act in regard to student work experience programmes.

Since the onsite phase of ERO’s evaluation the school has provided evidence of the following updates:

  • pandemic planning, referenced in the Health, Safety and Welfare Policy
  • procedures for appointments
  • policy for the appraisal of the principal.

Phillip Cowie

Director Review and Improvement Services Central

Central Region

11 November 2019

About the school

Location

Hastings

Ministry of Education profile number

231

School type

Composite (Years 1-15)

School roll

389

Gender composition

Male 51%

Female 49%

Ethnic composition

Māori 17%

NZ European/Pākehā 71%

Pacific 3%

Other ethnic groups 9%

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

Yes

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

August 2019

Date of this report

11 November 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review June 2016

Education Review June 2013

Education Review April 2010

Taikura Rudolf Steiner School - 28/06/2016

Findings

Students are supported to be confident, successful learners through a curriculum well aligned to Rudolf Steiner philosophy. Trustees, leaders and teachers work collaboratively to enact the school’s vision. The new leadership team strategically supports development and a greater alignment of robust school systems and processes aimed at improving learner outcomes.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

1 Context

What are the important features of this school that have an impact on student learning?

Taikura Rudolf Steiner School is a long established New Zealand school reflecting the educational philosophies of Rudolf Steiner. It is a co-educational, state integrated school catering for students from six to eighteen years of age. A proprietors’ trust oversees the school’s special character.

The school comprises the lower school, catering for classes 1 to 7 students, and the high school for classes 8 to 12. There is close collaboration with the three associated Rudolf Steiner kindergartens in Hawke's Bay, which most students have attended.

The curriculum is informed by both the Waldorf and The New Zealand Curriculum (NZC). Assessment of learning in the lower school is in relation to Rudolf Steiner Learning Steps (learning steps), aligned to the National Standards.

The school offers qualifications on the New Zealand Qualifications Framework Levels 1, 2 and 3 through the Steiner School Certificates (SCC). These qualifications are managed by the Steiner Education Development Trust on behalf of the Federation of Rudolf Steiner Waldorf Schools Aotearoa New Zealand.

Many staff have long associations with the school. Since the June 2013 ERO review, a new senior leadership team is in place. The principal took up her position at the beginning of 2016.

The school has a positive reporting history with ERO. There has been an ongoing focus on improving assessment practices in response to the previous ERO report. Health and safety systems continue to require strengthening.

2 Learning

How well does this school use achievement information to make positive changes to learners’ engagement, progress and achievement?

The school’s use of assessment information continues to improve. Leaders appropriately focus on developing shared teacher understandings and consistent assessment practice.

Practices are becoming more robust as teachers’ understanding of the learning steps and SSC requirements continue to be developed and embedded. There are improved systems and practices for moderation of the learning steps, well led by assessment leaders.

Good guidelines and tools for making teacher judgments about students’ learning and achievement in writing and mathematics are in place. School leaders recognise development of exemplars, continued focus on gathering evidence of learning, and moderation of reading judgements are next steps.

There is good support for teachers’ use of SSC assessments in the high school. Internal and external moderation of these provide a vehicle for consistency. The school works effectively with other New Zealand Rudolf Steiner schools to develop, trial and improve assessment practices.

School achievement information shows many students in the lower school, including Māori, are achieving at or above the expected levels. Leaders recognise there are areas of underachievement in reading, writing and mathematics across the school. They set appropriate targets to promote improvement and monitor progress towards these.

SSC results in 2015 show most students achieve qualifications at Levels 1 and 2. Many students receive certificate endorsements at Level 2. Almost all students gain University Entrance. Teachers acknowledge the need for improving results for some students at Level 3. They are aware of individual students and their progress towards qualifications and put appropriate strategies in place to assist their achievement.

Teachers know students well. They have long associations with students as they progress through the school. There are good systems for the identification and sharing of student information with teachers and parents. School leaders recognise that further development of tracking systems to monitor progress of learners at risk of poor educational outcomes is a next step.

3 Curriculum

How effectively does this school’s curriculum promote and support student learning?

A broad curriculum supports students’ holistic development. They demonstrate a sense of belonging and enjoyment in learning. Staff, trustees and families have a shared commitment to the vision and philosophies of the school’s special character.

Teachers support students to make respectful, confident contributions to school life. There are opportunities for students to play and discover. Students collaborate and support each other in their learning. They demonstrate good levels of interest and engagement in learning tasks. Peaceful, attractive learning environments provide for students’ positive engagement in learning.

A review of the lower school curriculum is currently underway to reflect and enrich local content and te ao Māori perspectives. There is an appropriate, ongoing focus on ensuring the curriculum incorporates the learning steps. Consideration of how the school's curriculum reflects the ‘learning to learn’ principle of NZC would be a useful development.

Plans in place for the school to lead a national review of curriculum for high school students are timely. Leaders recognise that revision of the curriculum framework for Classes 8 and 9 is a priority.

There are good systems for ensuring students with specific or additional needs are identified and provided for. Responses to these students are well considered and communicated to staff and parents. Ongoing review and reporting is in place. As demand increases, it is timely for the school to consider ways in which to make resourcing and provision for these students more effective.

Teachers are reflective about their practice and regularly engage in improvement-focused, professional dialogue. Further aligning the identification of students’ needs, deliberate teaching actions and evaluation of outcomes is a next step. This is likely to assist in identifying effective strategies to enhance learning, especially for learners at risk of poor educational outcomes.

How effectively does the school promote educational success for Māori, as Māori?

In the lower school, Māori achievement is similar to that of their peers. The school is seeking to improve achievement and retention for Māori students in the high school. The board has consulted with whānau Māori in response to the need to improve school provision for their students.

A specialist teacher supports the development of te reo me ngā tikanga Māori throughout the school. Whānau aspirations and input are actively sought through the parent/whānau group, Tu Mai Taikura.

This forum, along with a recently developed national curriculum for Rudolf Steiner schools, He Reo Puawai, should provide a good basis for ongoing development. Ensuring there are clear expectations for culturally responsive teaching practice should support implementation.

4 Sustainable Performance

How well placed is the school to sustain and improve its performance?

The school is well placed to sustain and improve its practice. Trustees and staff are collaborative and improvement focused. They demonstrate a commitment to the shared values and a vision for Rudolf Steiner education. There has been a strong focus on developing systems and documentation to promote sustainable, robust practice.

Good systems are in place to enable effective evaluation of school developments. Improvement is usefully guided by clear strategic planning. Initiatives are evaluated for their success and to inform next steps. More clearly documenting a school evaluation framework, is likely to support a consistent approach to internal evaluation.

The board is strategic in the way it sets school direction. Trustees seek the views and input of teachers, parents and families and are responsive to suggestions for improvement. They have a clear understanding of their roles. Comprehensive reporting assists their stewardship of school developments and decision making.

The new leadership team collaboratively supports development and improvement. They have a well-considered approach to managing and implementing change. They support teachers to take on leadership roles and participate in decision making.

Teachers demonstrate a reflective, critical approach to their practice. Staff are well connected to their community. Learning partnerships are supported by good levels of communication.

Review of teacher appraisal has resulted in the introduction of elements to support more effective teaching practice. A next step is to develop and consistently implement a schoolwide appraisal process to ensure teacher accountability and support improvement. A performance agreement is in place for the new principal. This should be reviewed to ensure it fully reflects Education Council guidelines.

Provision for international students

The school is a signatory to the Code of Practice for the Pastoral Care of International Students (the Code) established under section 238F of the Education Act 1989. The school has attested that it complies with all aspects of the Code.

At the time of the review, two international students were enrolled, and two exchange students were attending.

The school has set up good systems to cater for academic and pastoral needs of students, and their integration into the school and local community. Appropriate criteria have been developed to inform reports to the board about provision for these students.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance.

The board of trustees must ensure that:

  • the systems in place for identifying and remedying existing and potential hazards are effectively implemented.

[s7 Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992].

In order to improve current practice, the board and senior leaders should continue to review and refine policy guidelines and practices to meet legislative requirements, particularly in relation to health and safety.

Conclusion

Students are supported to be confident, successful learners through a curriculum well aligned to Rudolf Steiner philosophy. Trustees, leaders and teachers work collaboratively to enact the school’s vision. The new leadership team strategically supports development and a greater alignment of robust school systems and processes aimed at improving learner outcomes.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years. 

Joyce Gebbie

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central

28 June 2016

About the School

Location

Hastings

Ministry of Education profile number

231

School type

Composite (Years 1 to 15)

School roll

373

Number of international students

2

Gender composition

Male 52%, Female 48%

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Asian

Other ethnic groups

17%

75%

5%

3%

Special Features

Integrated (Rudolf Steiner)

Review team on site

May 2016

Date of this report

28 June 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

Education Review

Education Review

June 2013

April 2010

September 2007