Taulama Home-Based ECE 2 - 13/06/2019

1 Evaluation of Taulama Home-Based ECE 2

How well placed is Taulama Home-Based ECE 2 to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Taulama Home-Based ECE 2 is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Taulama Home-Based ECE 2 is one of seven home-based education and care networks owned by Kaliloa Education Limited. This network is licensed for up to 50 children, including a maximum of 35 under two years of age. Most of the children are Tongan. Educators provide programmes in their homes for up to four children at a time. This is the network's first ERO review.

A manager and supervisor works closely with the coordinators to support educators qualified to plan educational programmes based on children's interests, and to monitor health and safety requirements.

Key aspects of the service's philosophy are to provide a culturally responsive curriculum based on the Tongan concept of vā, respectful relationships and connectedness, and maintaining Tongan language and culture.

The Review Findings

Coordinators are continuing to build educators' knowledge and understanding of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, through coaching, modelling and workshops. Educators are well supported to:

  • foster children's dispositions and self-management skills

  • implement a programme that is meaningful for children under two years of age.

Educators integrate Tongan language and cultural practices well through the curriculum. They are continuing to develop an understanding of te ao Māori perspectives. Coordinators should continue to build educators' understanding of children as leaders of their learning.

Coordinators regularly observe children's experiences to build continuity in their learning and capture their progress and development in learning stories. Parents have many opportunities to contribute to these records. Online portals and weekly news video clips provide effective ways of communicating with educators and parents.

Coordinators use internal evaluation to inform ongoing improvement. Internal evaluation has identified the need to continue developing a curriculum that recognises the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Leaders recognise that transitions to school processes need to be strengthened.

The implementation of the service philosophy, vision and strategic direction is guided by clearly defined roles of governance and management of the service. Leaders purposefully build the capabilities and skills of all educators and staff through targeted professional development. There is a robust induction process for new educators. A relevant appraisal process is in place. It would be useful to develop an appraisal policy to clearly guide the process.

Effective management and leadership support service operations. There is a framework of policies and procedures in place. Internal evaluation is well understood and used to inform continuous improvement. Leaders agree that they should enhance internal evaluation processes and document evaluation findings and related actions.

Key Next Steps

Key next steps are to:

  • enhance the service's strategic planning by refining and deepening internal evaluation at all levels of service operations

  • build educators' understanding of Te Whāriki, and enable children to be leaders of their learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Taulama Home-Based ECE 2 completed an ERO Home-based Education and Care Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services Northern

Northern Region

13 June 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Home-based Education and Care Service

Location

Otahuhu, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

47219

Institution type

Homebased Network

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 35 aged under 2

Service roll

49

Standard or Quality Funded

Standard

Gender composition

Girls 29 Boys 20

Ethnic composition

Māori
Tongan
Samoan

1
44
4

Number of qualified coordinators in the network

2

Required ratios of staff educators to children

Under 2

1:2

Over 2

1:4

Review team on site

April 2019

Date of this report

13 June 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

No previous ERO reports

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to the draft methodology for ERO reviews in Home-based Education and Care Services: July 2014

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.