Te Kura o Pakipaki

Education institution number:
2637
School type:
Full Primary
School gender:
Co-Educational
Definition:
Bilingual School
Total roll:
29
Telephone:
Address:

316 Paki Paki Road, Pakipaki

View on map

Te Kura o Pakipaki - 26/11/2018

School Context

Te Kura o Pakipaki is a bilingual school providing students with the opportunity to achieve in both te reo Māori and English. Located in Hastings, it has students in Years 1 to 8. All 60 children enrolled are Māori. Since the December 2015 ERO report, the school has experienced roll growth.

The vision is to promote life-long learning through a child-centred and whānau-driven curriculum. Learning through Ko te Marautanga o Kura o Pakipaki supports the school’s mission for learners to become confident young leaders.

The values of: PAKI - persevere to succeed, achieve excellence, kotahitanga/whanaungatanga, and I am my tipuna, I am my marae, I am Pakipaki - underpin school operation.

School targets, to accelerate achievement for children at risk of poor educational outcomes in literacy and numeracy, are set annually.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, schoolwide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • progress and achievement in reading, writing and mathematics

  • progress and achievement in relation to the school achievement targets.

Longstanding and recently-elected members make up the board of trustees. They have close whakapapa connections with the school and community. In 2018, two new staff were appointed to fixed-term teaching positions.

Teachers are involved in a range of professional learning and development through external and internal initiatives to build teacher capability to promote positive learner outcomes. The current focus is literacy and mathematics.

The school is a member of the Te Waka o Maramatanga Kāhui Ako.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

The school has yet to attain equity and excellence for all its students.

Data from 2017 indicated that most children successfully met curriculum expectations in mathematics. The majority of learners achieved well in reading and writing.

Over time, rates of achievement in reading, writing and mathematics have been declining for both girls and boys.

Ongoing in-school disparity for boys in reading, writing and mathematics is well known by leaders, teachers and trustees. Raising student achievement is a priority for all staff.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those Māori and other students who need this?

The school needs to strengthen its response to students whose learning and achievement need acceleration.

Trustees, leaders and teachers are aware that many children need to make greater progress to meet their year-level expectations and are working with urgency to seek solutions.

Reported information from 2017 and 2018, indicates that a small number of target students who were below expectation have made accelerated progress.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

The leadership team is improvement focused and proactive in developing supportive learning environments. Leaders provide valuable professional learning opportunities to increase teacher capability to promote equitable and excellent outcomes for all students. There is a purposeful emphasis on establishing shared understanding of effective literacy and numeracy teaching strategies, and promotion of student self-management skills for learning.

Positive outcomes for Māori learners are nurtured through extensive partnerships with whānau, local marae, and external agencies. Comprehensive consultation through wananga occurred with five local marae to establish the school’s Ko te Marautanga o te Kura o Pakipaki document. The school draws on kaumātua and whānau expertise, and a wide range of community resources to enhance the learning programme.

Students access an extensive range of authentic and meaningful place-based learning opportunities that support them to gain the knowledge, skills and values required to fully embrace and stand proud in Te Pakipakitanga o Hinetemoa. Well-considered initiatives extend the provision of rich learning experiences where the language, identity and culture of Māori learners and their whānau are strongly affirmed. The school values are integral to this provision.

An appropriate range of systems, processes and strategies is used to identify and respond to individual students at risk of not achieving at expected curriculum levels. Learners with additional needs progress their learning through classroom programmes. External expertise appropriately supports this provision when needed. Students’ transitions into, through and beyond school are responsive to their individual strengths and needs.

Positive, respectful relationships are evident across the school. The enactment of tuākana tēina supports this. Māori learners are encouraged to confidently participate in all aspects of school life, and learning environments are managed in ways that foster engagement. A comprehensive range of culturally responsive opportunities is available for students to develop their leadership capabilities.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Further co-ordinating and aligning school practices and processes to focus more deliberately on equity of outcomes for all students is a next step. Better analysis of achievement data and improved reporting of progress and acceleration for all groups at risk of not achieving is needed. This should better inform targeted resourcing and teaching for those learners who require acceleration.

As the curriculum continues to be reviewed, clear guidance for effective teaching practice and expectations of student outcomes is needed across all learning areas. This should include the rationale and educational thinking behind new initiatives and provide expectations for assessment across the school.

Developing a shared understanding of inquiry and internal evaluation, across all levels of the school is a next step. This should support staff to clearly determine the effectiveness of teaching practices, learning interventions and school operation on improving student outcomes, and inform ongoing strategic direction and decision making.

To have a solid basis for ongoing improvement and sustain the good practice evident, the board needs to function well in all areas of stewardship and be confident in managing resources for students’ learning. The addition of new board members creates the opportunity for all trustees to access learning about stewardship and build their capacity to more effectively carry out their roles and responsibilities. This should improve their capability to scrutinise the effectiveness of the school in achieving valued student outcomes.

3 Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration

  • curriculum

  • management of health, safety and welfare

  • personnel management

  • finance

  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)

  • physical safety of students

  • teacher registration and certification

  • processes for appointing staff

  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students

  • attendance

  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

4 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • partnerships with whānau, local marae and community that enrich the school’s curriculum provision

  • collaboration among leaders and teachers that responds to the needs of diverse learners

  • a culturally responsive and caring environment that promotes students’ learning, wellbeing, and culture, language and identity

  • learning opportunities in the school and wider community that are responsive to the needs of each student.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are in:

  • better monitoring and reporting of progress and acceleration of all groups at risk of not achieving educational success [ERO will monitor and discuss progress with the school]

  • documenting the school’s expectations for all curriculum areas, new initiatives and assessment to ensure shared understanding and further support teaching and learning

  • building schoolwide inquiry and internal evaluation to better determine the effectiveness of programmes and actions on student outcomes [ERO will provide an internal evaluation workshop for trustees and senior leaders]

  • improving stewardship capability to further strengthen ongoing strategic direction and decision-making.

ERO recommends that the school continues to seek assistance from the Ministry of Education in order to bring about improvements in the capacity of the board to confidently manage its resources, so that support for student learning is well sustained. 

ERO’s next external evaluation process and timing

ERO is likely to carry out the next external evaluation in three years.

Alan Wynyard

Director Review & Improvement Services Central

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

26 November 2018

About the school

Location

Pakipaki

Ministry of Education profile number

2637

School type

Full Primary (Years 1-8)

School roll

60

Gender composition

Boys 30, Girls 30

Ethnic composition

Māori 60

Students with Ongoing Resourcing Funding (ORS)

No

Provision of Māori medium education

Yes

Number of Māori medium classes

4

Total number of students in Māori medium (MME)

0

Total number of students in Māori language in English medium (MLE)

60

Number of students in Level 2 MME

60

Review team on site

September 2018

Date of this report

26 November 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review December 2015

Education Review March 2013

Education Review June 2010

Te Kura o Pakipaki - 16/12/2015

Findings

Students who attend Te Kura o Pakipaki learn in bilingual classrooms where their Māori language, identity and culture are nurtured and their sense of whanaungatanga is strong. Achievement is improving and teachers are building their capability to deliberately respond to learners at risk of not achieving. 

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

1 Context

What are the important features of this school that have an impact on student learning?

Te Kura o Pakipaki is a primary school catering for Years 1 to 8 students, located in the settlement of Pakipaki on the outskirts of Hastings. All students attending the school are Māori. The majority of students and whānau are of Ngāti Kahungunu descent and affiliate to the three existing marae in the community: Mihiroa; Houngarea; and Taraia. The school also has associations with two other Hastings marae and some students travel to school in a subsidised minivan from other Hastings suburbs.

The school is bilingual and provides opportunity for students in all classrooms to achieve in both
te reo Māori and English. The current roll is 42 students, a decline since the March 2013 ERO report.

2 Learning

How well does this school use achievement information to make positive changes to learners’ engagement, progress and achievement?

The school is developing its use of achievement information to make positive changes to learners’ engagement, progress and achievement.

Appropriate assessment tools are used to gather a range of data. This is used to identify students at risk of not achieving in relation to National Standards and to determine all students learning needs. Teachers have responded to professional development in writing and are developing their capability to match teaching strategies to specific needs for individual students. Learning progressions are used that support both teachers and students to decide next learning steps.

Strengthening the processes used to decide overall teacher judgements (OTJs) about students' achievement in relation to National Standards is a next step. Staff should consider the use of more norm-referenced assessment tools to increase the credibility of their judgements. Increasing moderation, particularly in reading and mathematics should increase reliability of OTJs. 

The percentage of students who achieve at or above in relation to the National Standards in mathematics and reading has significantly improved since the previous ERO review. In writing, actions in 2015 have seen 33% of target students accelerate their progress within six months.

The board receives regular updates about student achievement in relation to charter goals and detailed reporting about the actions being taken by staff. Due to the small number of students enrolled at the school, using percentage figures to report progress is creating an unclear picture. Setting targets based on the numbers of students who need to accelerate their progress should be more helpful. Including evaluative comment about the outcomes for these learners as a result of teacher actions should assist staff and the board to decide what works in improving progress for these students.  

3 Curriculum

How effectively does this school’s curriculum promote and support student learning?

The school curriculum is strongly influenced by the community’s aspirations for students to embrace their whakapapa and become confident in their language, identity and culture. Programmes include many opportunities for students to learn about local history and tikanga Māori. There is an emphasis on students developing the skills for environmental sustainability and maintaining the uniqueness of the local Pakipaki environment.

Te reo me ngā tikanga Māori are highly valued and promoted within the school. The majority of teachers’ instructional and spoken language is te reo Māori. Students experience an environment that affirms them as Māori and fosters a strong sense of belonging. An appropriate goal for 2015 is to further improve teacher capability and student proficiency. This is well supported by a detailed action plan, external professional development and collaborative action by teachers.

Staff are redeveloping their localised curriculum. The intention is to reflect the unique characteristics of the local marae and align these to graduate profile skills and qualities, values of the school and the principles and key competencies of The New Zealand Curriculum. This work is in the early stages of development, having been shared with the board. The next step is to seek whānau and community feedback.

ERO’s evaluation affirms the need to complete this work and include within the developing curriculum:

  • guidelines for effective teaching and learning in all essential learning areas
  • updated guidelines for assessment practice.

Aspects of teacher practice reinforce students knowing about themselves as learners. This is more apparent within the writing programme and needs further development in order for students to experience consistency and embed skills.

The acquisition of oral language is a key focus in the new entrant programme. Diagnostic testing and close observation are used to identify learners’ needs and adapt programme planning. For students with oral language needs, the school aims to develop students’ ability to communicate and participate fully in learning with their peers.

A number of initiatives support student wellbeing. A newly developed framework for behaviour is promoting students’ self management of their relationships with others.

4 Sustainable Performance

How well placed is the school to sustain and improve its performance?

The governance frameworks developed at the time of the previous ERO review continue to support the board to be structured and well organised in its role. Trustees are clearly focused on improving student achievement. Policy review is regular.

The school is currently engaged in a Ministry of Education initiative to strengthen school performance. Useful action plans help guide direction. A programme is in place to support regular monitoring, review and reporting to the board.

Self review is developing. Commentary about goals from within action plans is predominantly based on describing the actions taken rather than the outcomes achieved. Evaluation of the quality and impacts of programmes and initiatives is the next step.

External professional learning and development (PLD) supports teachers to develop their practice in literacy. Regular internally-led PLD is increasing collaboration and chances for sharing and modelling teacher practice. Inquiring into the effectiveness of their practice is in the very early stages of development for most teachers. A good model exists within the school and stronger leadership, expectations and monitoring of the existing process are necessary.

Appraisal is not yet successful in supporting improved practice. A newly developed model should provide more structured, regular constructive feedback, with clearer links to the Practising Teacher Criteria. Tātaiako: Cultural Competencies for Teachers of Māori Learners is embedded within the new framework.

The board is proactive in engaging whānau and seeking their feedback on school performance. They acknowledge that more than half of students travel from beyond the Pakipaki area to the school and this could pose challenges for communication. Building strong relationships with the Pakipaki community and whānau whanui of the kura is a strategic goal. An initiative to support parents as partners for learning in reading has had some success and provides a model for further action.

In 2015, the board has funded additional teacher time to create an extra class and substantially lower class sizes to support their goal of accelerated progress for learners. They have also partially funded transport to the school for many students. These actions are not financially sustainable in the long term. The board should review priorities in light of its smaller roll. 

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance.

Conclusion

Students who attend Te Kura o Pakipaki learn in bilingual classrooms where their Māori language, identity and culture are nurtured and their sense of whanaungatanga is strong. Achievement is improving and teachers are building their capability to deliberately respond to learners at risk of not achieving. 

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years. 

Joyce Gebbie
Deputy Chief Review Officer Central

16 December 2015

About the School 

Location

Pakipaki

Ministry of Education profile number

2637

School type

Full Primary (Years 1 to 8)

School roll

42

Gender composition

Female 24, Male 18

Ethnic composition

Māori

100%

Special Features

Bilingual - Level 2, all classrooms

Review team on site

October 2015

Date of this report

16 December 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review
Education Review
Education Review

March 2013
June 2010
June 2009