Tiny Tots Childcare Centre

Education institution number:
20181
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
53
Telephone:
Address:

18 Raleigh Road, Northcote, Auckland

View on map

Tiny Tots Childcare Centre

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Tiny Tots Childcare Centre are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whakatō Emerging

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 

Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whakatō Emerging

Whakatō Emerging

2 Context of the Service

Tiny Tots Childcare Centre is a privately owned and operated service. A manager and an experienced head teacher are supported by an external advisor. This service has longstanding relationships with families in the community. Approximately a quarter of the children attending have Māori heritage.

3 Summary of findings

Children engage in sustained play of their choice in a positive, calm environment. Their preferences are respected, and they have good opportunities to lead their own learning. Teachers are very responsive to children’s interests. They support children to explore the environment and foster their imagination and creativity. Reciprocal, nurturing relationships between teachers and children are evident.

Teachers support children’s language development through using open-ended questions. Those who work with infants recognise and respond to their non-verbal cues. Their teaching practice includes the use of te reo Māori in their interactions with these younger children.

Leaders and teachers have opportunities for relevant professional learning. External expertise has been carefully selected to build leaders’ and teachers’ capability across all aspects of service operations. Curriculum planning, assessment and evaluation documents do not yet consistently show the curriculum or learning experienced by children at this service.

The external advisor is guiding the implementation of governance and management structures to support effective practice. A range of relevant evaluation information is gathered. Leaders are prioritising mentoring and coaching support to build teachers’ collective understandings and capability.  Priorities for leaders and teachers should include:

  • developing teachers’ knowledge of how to design and document a responsive curriculum focused on improved outcomes for all children

  • using internal evaluation processes to show how teaching and the curriculum impacts on children’s learning.

Improvement actions

Tiny Tots Childcare Centre will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Develop leaders’ and teachers’ collective capability to plan, assess, evaluate and document a responsive curriculum.

  • Build leaders’ and teachers’ capability to evaluate the impact of practices on improved outcomes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Tiny Tots Childcare Centre completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Filivaifale Jason Swann
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

17 November 2022 

6 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Tiny Tots Childcare Centre

Profile Number

20181

Location

Northcote, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 12 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

65

Review team on site

September 2022

Date of this report

17 November 2022

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, January 2019
Education Review, March 2015

Tiny Tots Childcare Centre - 17/01/2019

1 Evaluation of Tiny Tots Childcare Centre

How well placed is Tiny Tots Childcare Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Tiny Tots Childcare Centre in Northcote is owned by a family trust and operated by an experienced licensee. The centre provides for up to for 50 children, including 12 under the age of two years.

The well-established centre occupies a large villa in a residential area. The premises have been thoughtfully renovated and resourced creating a homely environment. A modern purpose-built extension caters for infants and babies. Programmes are organised for children in three different age groups. Two centre leaders work with a team of teachers, most of whom are qualified.

The centre's philosophy is guided by the principles of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. It promotes an environment where partnerships with family and community are valued. Care, nurturing and love form the foundation of the philosophy. Children are recognised as capable, independent learners. Their learning and wellbeing are prioritised.

Previous ERO reports noted the family friendly approach of managers and staff and the collegiality of the teachers. These aspects continue to be a feature of the centre. Centre leaders have responded positively to suggestions for improvement in the 2015 ERO report. These related to strategic planning and appraisal development.

The Review Findings

Infants and toddlers play in a calm and attractive environment. Routines are unhurried and respectful care practices support the development of children's self-help skills and independence. Teachers skilfully provide opportunities to develop children's language. Relationships between children and adults are trusting and nurturing. Transitions between rooms are personalised to meet children's needs.

Children have a strong sense of belonging, play collaboratively and enjoy periods of uninterrupted play. They have easy access to a variety of resources to make independent choices about their play. A large outdoor space offers opportunities to develop physical capability. The local community and natural environment are used well to maximise children's learning. Children have good opportunities to learn about literacy and numeracy and science through their play.

Teachers know the children well and work closely with them to support their interests. They ask questions that help children to develop their language and thinking, and allow time for children to express their ideas. Teachers demonstrate their understanding of children through their discussions and written observations. Teachers have focused on supporting child-led learning and the development of positive dispositions for learning.

Respect for biculturalism is evident in the environment and centre practices. Teachers value and are committed to implementing Treaty-based practices. Te reo and tikanga Māori are confidently included in the context of children's play, and at mat-time and kai times. Linking bicultural practices to the developing environmental sustainability focus will enrich the programme.

Children's portfolios are meaningful records of their learning. Teachers' knowledge about children's learning is evident. Children's individual and group interests are regularly updated and evaluated. Parents/whānau receive good information about their children's learning and development. They regularly contribute to shared assessments of children's learning through the effective use of an online tool.

Teachers focus on how children's learning can be extended and plan for individual children. They make good use of programme evaluation to reflect on the impact that their teaching practices have on children.

A system of internal evaluation has been established and leaders and teachers use this evaluation to progress centre goals. Continuing to focus evaluative questions on teaching practices and outcomes for children will help to build teachers' reflective and evaluative skills.

Teachers participate in ongoing professional development, and are currently focusing on developing their knowledge of Te Whāriki (2017). Targeted professional learning has impacted positively on teachers' professional knowledge and capability. The centre's participation in the local Kāhui Ako | Community of Learning reflects their commitment to strengthening community relationships and continued success for children. The centre is supported by an external mentor whose expertise is building teachers' professional knowledge in an ongoing way.

Effective leadership is a prominent feature in the centre, and contributes to positive outcomes for children. Centre leaders have a clear vision and have established a sound strategic direction. Comprehensive policies and procedures guide the professional practice in the centre.

Key Next Steps

The centre's next key steps include:

continuing to strengthen opportunities for children to lead their own learning

  • considering ways to make children's cultural backgrounds visible in their portfolios

  • further developing bicultural practices and links to environmental sustainability

  • continuing to refine the use of evaluative questions to deepen and increase the rigour of internal evaluation.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Tiny Tots Childcare Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Tiny Tots Childcare Centre will be in three years.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

17 January 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Northcote, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

20181

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 12 aged under 2

Service roll

65

Gender composition

Boys 37 Girls 28

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Chinese
other ethnic groups

4
46
5
10

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:6

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

October 2018

Date of this report

17 January 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

March 2015

Education Review

June 2012

Education Review

November 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Tiny Tots Childcare Centre - 11/03/2015

1 Evaluation of Tiny Tots Childcare Centre

How well placed is Tiny Tots Childcare Centre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Tiny Tots Childcare is a privately owned early childhood care and education centre in Northcote. The centre is licensed for 50 children, including 10 under the age of two years. It is owned by a trust and operated by an experienced licensee. Parents who spoke to ERO highly recommend the service.

The centre occupies a large villa in a residential area. ERO has reviewed the centre on two previous occasions. The family friendly approach of the managers and staff continues to be a key feature. Since the 2012 ERO review, a modern purpose-built facility has been established to cater for infants and babies.

Parents appreciate the staff’s loyalty to the centre and commitment to children. Teachers work collegially and are well supported by centre owners. A new manager was appointed two years ago to provide leadership across the centre.

Programmes are organised for children in three different age groups. Children’s needs are met through well structured routines and the shared expectations of teachers and children. Centre managers and staff make planned improvements using findings from self review and professional learning.

The Review Findings

Children and their families are well known to the staff. Children are nurtured and well cared for. Babies and infants benefit from affectionate and gentle interactions with teachers. Teachers and children form trusting and respectful relationships. This supports children’s learning and development. Children enjoy playing together, sharing equipment and developing new skills.

Children develop a sense of belonging and form friendships in the centre. The learning programme is based on Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, and promotes children’s wellbeing. Children confidently use the environment and the resources available to support their play. Parents and family members are included in the many special event days that are part of the programme.

Centre routines, including mat times and meal times, as well as some group learning times, are planned for children in each of the different age-related groups. Children have time to make individual choices about their play and opportunities for mixed-age play occur throughout the day. Teachers should consider reducing the number of transitions children experience during their time at the centre. It would also be useful for teachers to explore ways to include more opportunities for complex and self directed play, especially for older children.

Teachers are developing new curriculum planning approaches that better reflect children’s interests. They are looking at ways to extend children’s learning through play. As these systems are embedded, centre leaders will be able to review the ways teachers assess children’s progress and learning. Children’s learning journeys are documented in individual portfolios. Teachers agree that they are now better able to show clearer links between their planning and assessment practices.

Centre managers involve staff in planning for centre improvement. They identify teachers’ development needs and meet regularly with staff to discuss professional matters. Several of the teachers have led useful areas of self review, including a review of transitions. Managers are introducing changes in the staff appraisal system to guide teacher practices and reflections.

Managers have identified other areas for review and development during 2015. These include further consideration of bicultural perspectives in centre programmes, and the introduction of an electronic process to share children’s progress and development with parents. These new developments are being supported by the head teacher who will have increased responsibility for centre-wide development.

Teachers are currently completing a review of the centre philosophy. This is a valuable opportunity to share best practice and focus on positive outcomes for children. Self review and teacher appraisal would be greatly enhanced by centre managers more formally documenting and sharing their short and long-term goals and developing action plans.

Key Next Steps

Centre managers and ERO discussed key next steps in programme development that included making strategic and annual planning goals more evident and using the goals to guide centre improvement and self review.

Recommendation

ERO recommends that centre managers use ongoing professional development to enable teachers to strengthen child-initiated approaches to learning.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Tiny Tots Childcare Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Tiny Tots Childcare Centre will be in three years.

Dale Bailey Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

11 March 2015

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Northcote, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

20181

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

72

Gender composition

Boys 38 Girls 34

Ethnic composition

Pākehā

Chinese

German

other

61

4

2

5

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

 

Over 2

1:6

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

January 2015

Date of this report

11 March 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

March 2012

 

Education Review

November 2008

     

3. General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.