Titahi Bay Intermediate

Titahi Bay Intermediate - 03/12/2020

Findings

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO ‘s overall evaluation judgement of Titahi Bay Intermediate’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Well placed.

1 Background and Context

What is the background and context for this school’s review?

Titahi Bay Intermediate provides education for students in Years 7 and 8. The current roll of 158 students includes 58% who are Māori and 15% of Pacific heritage.

The June 2018 ERO report identified areas for review and development relating to assessment, achievement and acceleration processes; increasing the effectiveness of teaching; strengthening schoolwide and governance systems, the curriculum and internal evaluation.

Since 2018, leaders and teachers have been participating in literacy professional development. Since 2019, staff have been focusing on development of leadership and teaching practice. A Student Achievement Facilitator (SAF) has supported leaders and the New Zealand School Trustees Association (NZSTA) has worked with the Board of Trustees. Developing student inquiry is a focus for 2020.

In the past twelve months, several new classroom teachers have been appointed.

2 Review and Development

How effectively is the school addressing its priorities for review and development?

Priorities identified for review and development

The June 2018 ERO report identified the following areas of development:

  • raising student achievement

  • strengthening the use of assessment and reporting of student progress and achievement

  • improving appraisal

  • further developing trustees’ governance role

  • reviewing the curriculum

  • strengthening internal evaluation.

This ERO review has found that the trustees, principal and teachers have made significant progress in the areas identified in ERO’s 2018 report.

Titahi Bay Intermediate School leaders and teachers have made sound progress with:

  • establishing and monitoring learning targets

  • collating, analyzing and using robust student achievement data for planning

  • regularly reporting student progress and acceleration to the board.

Teachers make effective use of nationally-normed assessment tools to identify student achievement and next learning steps.

Robust systems and processes have been developed to support accelerated student progress. Te Ara Whakamua is the school’s template for tracking student progress and supporting individual student’s learning goals.

Overall student achievement has increased since the 2018 ERO report.

Achievement data from the end of 2018 showed that most Year 7 students were achieving at or above curriculum expectations in reading, writing and mathematics. Most Year 8 students were achieving well in reading. Approximately half of the Year 8 students were achieving at or above expectations in writing and mathematics.

At the end of 2019, almost all Year 7 students were achieving at or above expectations in reading and mathematics and most in writing. The majority of Year 8 students were achieving at or above expectations in reading, writing and mathematics.

in 2019 most students who began the year achieving below curriculum expectations made accelerated progress during the year.

Students learn in settled, positive classrooms. They are engaged in relevant, meaningful learning tasks. All teachers use deliberate acts of teaching to promote learning. They give specific, relevant feedback and use questioning effectively to extend students’ thinking. Teachers make deliberate use of examples and link new learning to students’ prior knowledge. Students talk confidently about the purpose of their learning.

The curriculum supports a coherent and consistent approach to teaching and learning across the school. The school’s curriculum provides clear guidance for teachers. There is clarity about the teaching practices expected in core learning areas. Teachers are well supported to develop the expected practices through comprehensive professional development. Through the careful choice of inquiry learning topics, students are learning within relevant and localized contexts. The curriculum includes precise indications of achievement levels and rates of progress of students.

School leaders have established an appropriate appraisal framework. This is effectively supporting improved teaching capability. The Standards for the Teaching Profession are an integral part of appraisal. A key feature of appraisal is the useful, collaborative coaching process that promotes conversations about teacher practice and the impact on student learning.

3 Sustainable performance and self review

How well placed is the school to sustain and continue to improve and review its performance?

The school is making good progress with developing very sound processes and practices to sustain and continue to improve and review its performance.

The board of trustees actively represents and serves the school. Students’ learning and wellbeing is a core focus of the board, principal and other senior leaders. Operational policies and procedures have been reviewed and a policy timetable developed.

Over the past two years school leaders have effectively aligned school-wide planning, professional development and appraisal to the strategic direction of the school.

School leaders have established useful internal evaluation for improvement practice. Teachers regularly reflect on their teaching, often in consultation with leaders and professional development and learning providers. They adjust their practice as appropriate. There is increased analysis and evaluation by leaders of information gathered, including student progress and achievement data and community survey responses. Trustees and leaders are reviewing a range of school operations. One completed review has led to greater engagement of parents and whānau in their children’s learning. Internal evaluation is leading to improved opportunities and more equitable outcomes for all students.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.

Compliance

ERO identified an area of non-compliance. Consultation about the health curriculum has not been carried out in the last two years.

In order to address this the board of trustees must adopt a statement on the delivery of the health curriculum, at least once in every two years, after consultation with the school community
[Section 60B Education Act 1989]

Conclusion

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO ‘s overall evaluation judgement of Titahi Bay Intermediate’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Well placed.

ERO’s Framework: Overall Findings and Judgement Tool derived from School Evaluation Indicators: Effective Practice for Improvement and Learner Success is available on ERO’s website.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)

Southern Region - Te Tai Tini

3 December 2020

About the school

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.

Titahi Bay Intermediate - 06/06/2018

School Context

Titahi Bay Intermediate caters for students in Years 7 and 8. At the time of this review there were 122 children on the roll with 61% identifying as Māori and 16% as Pacific.

Values of manaakitanga, risk taking, high expectations, ownership, pride and effective questioning underpin the school’s renewed vision of: ‘Find the way, know the way, lead the way’.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board schoolwide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • reading, writing and mathematics including results from focused initiatives for priority learners

  • programmes and activities in wider curriculum areas

  • student engagement and wellbeing through specialised programmes designed to build resilience, confidence and independence.

Since the July 2014 ERO review, there have been changes in trustees and staff. The leadership team has been expanded to include an assistant principal.

Professional learning and development (PLD) for teachers in a Ministry of Education (MoE) initiative, Accelerated Literacy Learning (ALL), since 2015, has focused on writing. There has also been PLD in mathematics and Positive Behaviour for Learning (PB4L).

The school is a member of the Te Puna Mātauranga Kāhui Ako|Community of Learning.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

Achieving equitable outcomes for all students continues to be a challenge for the school.

Achievement data from 2016 and provisional 2017 results indicate that approximately half of the students achieve at or above relevant expectations. Overall levels of achievement have declined since 2014. There is a deliberate focus on raising achievement of Māori and Pacific boys in reading, writing and mathematics as the school has identified this as an area of large disparity.

1.2 How effectively does this school respond to those Māori and other students whose learning and achievement need acceleration?

School leaders report that some students identified in 2017 targets have made accelerated progress in writing. The school is not yet successful in accelerating the progress of the majority of students at risk of not achieving at expected levels.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence?

Processes and systems are being strengthened by the board and leadership to promote equity and excellence.

A key focus has been a well-considered review by trustees and leadership of the school’s charter involving consultation with all members of the community. The new vision and strategic plan is centred on raising student achievement and provides the school with appropriate direction, purpose and a framework for achieving equity and excellence.

A range of creative and positive ways are used to engage whānau and families in the life of the school. Their expertise, input and ideas are acknowledged and valued. Learning partnerships are promoted, and have led to higher levels of engagement and increased parent understanding and knowledge. Collaboration and consultation is actively fostered with an increasing emphasis on learning. There is a growing relationship with Ngāti Toa which supports Māori students’ identity, language and culture.

The school has a respectful and welcoming culture. Students are engaged, able to share and make decisions about their learning. They respond well to positive and constructive feedback from their teachers. Routines are clear and well understood. Students have opportunities for leadership and participate in a range of cultural, sporting and academic activities. Digital tools are used appropriately to support learning. Students have a strong sense of belonging, ownership and pride in the school. They interact positively and support each other.

Students with additional needs are identified and their strengths, interests and needs are well known. External support and agencies work with teachers to appropriately respond to their needs.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence?

Trustees, leaders and staff are building a shared understanding and knowledge about accelerated learning to achieve equity and excellence in student outcomes. Ongoing developments in key systems and processes are needed to support accelerated student achievement.

School leaders and teachers should collate, effectively analyse and use robust data to report on progress and acceleration to enable the board and leaders to establish and monitor learning targets. Regular reporting of the rates of acceleration to the board, staff and parent community should support effective decision making.

A more coherent approach to improvement should be established through the alignment of all processes, plans, teaching practice, PLD, appraisal and teacher inquiry, with identified schoolwide learning targets.

Curriculum statements should be reviewed to give clear guidance for effective teaching practice and expectations of student outcomes. The curriculum should also acknowledge the unique place of the school in the community.

These improvements should be underpinned by ongoing internal evaluation of what is working, what is not, and what needs to change.

3 Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)

  • physical safety of students

  • teacher registration and certification

  • processes for appointing staff

  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students

  • attendance

  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

Appraisal audit

Improvement to appraisal processes is needed so that they align with Education Council Guidelines.

Areas for improved compliance practice

To improve current practice, the board of trustees should undertake regular review and development of policies and procedures, related to employment processes.

4 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • direction set by the board of trustees, including a well-considered strategic plan that focuses on raising student achievement

  • learner partnerships with parents, whānau and Ngāti Toa, that value and promote student learning and success

  • a culture of respectful learning relationships, that support students to identify strongly with their school, engage and take pride in their learning.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, development priorities are in:

  • achieving equity for all groups in the school and raising levels of achievement overall through effective teaching practice that responds to needs

  • using assessment processes to reliably know about the progress and achievement of all students

  • building cohesive and aligned processes that focus on raising achievement overall and, in particular, accelerating the progress of identified students

  • strengthening internal evaluation, so that trustees, leadership and teachers can determine the impact of teaching programmes to inform decision making.

Recommendations

ERO recommends that:

The school seek support from the Ministry of Education in order to bring about improvements in:

  • use of student achievement data
  • curriculum development
  • professional leadership and teaching capacity
  • evaluation, inquiry and knowledge building.

The board seek support from the New Zealand School Trustees Association to assist trustees to:

  • strengthen and support their governance role
  • undertake policy and procedure development and review.

ERO’s next external evaluation process and timing

ERO intends to carry out a process of ongoing external evaluation to support development over the course of one-to-two years.

Patricia Davey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

Te Tai Pokapū - Central Region

6 June 2018

About the school

Location

Porirua

Ministry of Education profile number

3043

School type

Intermediate (Years 7 to 8)

School roll

122

Gender composition

Male 62, Female 60

Ethnic composition

Māori 61%
Pacific 16%
Pākehā 17%
Other ethnicities 6%

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

November 2017

Special Features

Host School for Resource Teachers: Learning and Behaviour Technology Programme Provider

Date of this report

6 June 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, December 2014
Education Review, September 2011
Supplementary Review, October 2008