Henderson Valley Private Kindergarten

Education institution number:
45473
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
37
Telephone:
Address:

101 Coulter Rd, Henderson, Waitakere

View on map

Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus - 02/08/2019

1 Evaluation of Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus

How well placed is Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus in Henderson Valley, is one of two privately owned centres. It provides sessional or all-day education and care for up to 39 children over two years of age. There are small groups of children with Māori or other ethnic backgrounds.

The service's philosophy promotes children's confidence and acknowledges the importance of partnership between teachers and families. Teachers aim to provide predictable routines and encourage children to grow in knowledge and experiences in preparation for school. Features of the service are spacious environments and opportunities to interact with farm animals.

The licensee holds a full practising teacher certificate and is responsible for the service's governance and management. He leads the teaching team and is supported by three registered teachers, one of whom is the centre supervisor, and two other staff members. The owner has a leadership role, working with local schools in the Kōtuitui Community of Learning | Kāhui Ako.

The 2015 ERO report identified parents' enthusiastic support and noted that children interacted confidently and cooperatively. The report recommended improvements in assessment, planning and evaluation, including sharing written information with whānau about their children's learning progress. It also noted the need to improve understanding about changes in legislation and licensing requirements in relation to children's safety. While some progress has been made there is still work to be done to strengthen curriculum documentation, teacher appraisal, management and administration practices.

The Review Findings

Warm, responsive relationships underpin centre practices. Parents and children are greeted on arrival by staff. Children settle well and engage in play in the spacious, well-resourced learning environment. Children converse confidently with each other and approach adults for comfort, care and individual needs. They show care and concern for others, are eager learners, and demonstrate a sense of belonging.

Teachers are warm and encouraging as they guide children’s learning. They enact their philosophy of providing predictable routines to support children's sense of security. Children play either inside or outdoors at set times each day.

Children have good opportunities to explore, be adventurous and physically active in the large outside area. Teachers know children and families very well and provide a language rich curriculum. They demonstrate intentional teaching and encourage children to share their ideas.

The structured programme prioritises the development of oral language, literacy, numeracy and social competence skills. There is an emphasis on preparing children for school and supporting their transition to school. Children participate in mat times, games and activities, and access a wide variety of resources.

Teachers promote the use of te reo Māori at mat times and sing waiata with the children. Displays and resources reflect their bicultural commitment. Children with additional learning needs are integrated into the programme. Teachers are inclusive and responsive, and work closely with parents and external agencies.

Leaders and teachers engage in informal and purposeful daily internal evaluation. They have end-of-session meetings to discuss their observations, often with a focus on individual children's behaviour, and some group planning. Group planning that reflects Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, is well established. Teachers are aware they should focus planning and assessment on children's individual interests and dispositions for learning, and make their extension of child-led learning more visible in assessment and planning documentation.

The kindergarten has well-established leadership and extensive connections with local schools, and wider educational community. Leaders and the teaching team are reviewing their strategic plan, which is closely aligned to their philosophy. They could consider how to better reflect Te Whāriki, through this review, leading to likely improvements in teaching practice and children's learning outcomes. As part of the centre's internal evaluation, increasing the rigour and analysis of regular parent surveys would also help to identify ways to enhance practices.

Leaders and staff would benefit from accessing external support to build capacity and improve practices across different areas of service operations, including internal evaluation, teaching and learning, governance and management.

Key Next Steps

Leaders and teachers agree that their next steps are to:

  • access external support to improve policies, teaching practices and children's learning outcomes

  • improve opportunities for children to lead their own learning and more readily access the outdoor learning environment

  • continue developing bicultural practices

  • develop robust induction and appraisal processes to support improvements in teaching practice

  • develop shared understandings about implementing the revised Te Whāriki, and increasing the visibility of individual children's learning in assessment and planning documentation.

Since the on-site phase of this ERO review, the owner has taken steps to address aspects of practice and documentation that did not meet legal requirements.

A new steering committee provides opportunities for parents to contribute to centre review and development.

Some policies and procedures have been adapted to reflect requirements, particularly those relating to safety checking of staff.

The owner has established a centre manager role to provide management and leadership, and to ensure that regulatory requirements are met at all times.

Recommendation

ERO has requested an action plan from the service provider that shows how priorities for improvement will be addressed. ERO will request progress updates against the plan.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Actions for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to health and safety, governance and management. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following areas:

  • policies, practices and documentation related to systematic review, human resource management, and safety checking of all adults working with children

  • records of three-monthly emergency drills, and parental acknowledgement of the administration of medication

  • risk analysis and management in relation to any excursion or time when children are off the licensed premises as part of the programme.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS8,17,28,31, GMA6,7,7A; Children's Act 2014.

Steve Tanner

Director Review and Improvement Services Northern

Northern Region

2 August 2019

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Henderson, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

45473

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

39 children aged over 2 years

Service roll

44

Gender composition

Girls 24 Boys 20

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
other ethnic groups

3
36
5

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

May 2019

Date of this report

2 August 2019

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

November 2015

Education Review

September 2012

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus - 05/11/2015

1 Evaluation of Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus

How well placed is Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Titirangi Private Kindergarten Rural Campus is situated in Henderson Valley and provides flexible options, including full day sessions, for up to 39 children over two years of age. Teacher practice reflects the centre’s philosophy that children's “happiness, academic growth and behaviour results from them forming a positive self-image at an early age.”

Children have opportunities to interact with farm animals and play in spacious indoor and outdoor environments. They are well cared for and interact confidently and cooperatively with each other and adults.

The supportive and collaborative relationship between the experienced owners, centre management and teachers benefits centre operations. They have identified ways of including parent contributions and ideas more in decision making about the centre’s strategic direction.

The centre supervisor and teachers have developed systems to improve and sustain recommendations from the 2012 ERO report.

The Review Findings

Children are supported by teachers to develop their social skills and interests. As a result of positive changes, children benefit from teachers who recognise and respond to incidental learning opportunities. This practice contributes to children settling well to their play and making friends. Children have opportunities to learn independently and collaboratively. They interact confidently with others in their play in an unhurried centre environment.

Teachers know children and their families well. Relationships between teachers and children, and between teachers and parents, are warm and respectful. Teachers help children to interact in caring ways and to develop empathy towards others. High teacher ratios provide very good opportunities for adults to interact with individual children and to support their learning. Children are encouraged to try new experiences and explore areas of play independently. They have meaningful opportunities to develop understandings about the natural environment.

 Children’s transitions to and within the centre are well managed. Teachers are committed to helping children and families experience a seamless move to school. They are currently developing partnerships with local schools to help strengthen this important transition in children’s lives.

Programme planning and assessment has been refined since the 2012 ERO review in order to support each child in their growth and development. The supervisor has successfully promoted processes for recognising and responding to children’s learning dispositions. As a result of her leadership, there are some good examples of teachers extending individual children’s learning. These models of sustained, extended play provide a basis for further enhancing high quality teaching and learning practices.

Teachers meet to discuss daily observations of children's learning. This responsive approach to planning ensures that teachers support children's mathematical and literacy development. A next step for teachers in planning for children’s emerging interests is to consider ways of recording and sharing children’s ongoing learning and development. These records of learning could provide children and families with a means for revisiting learning.

Other features of effective teaching practice in the centre include:

  • building on children’s ideas through in-depth discussions with children
  • engaging in child-initiated conversations about play and learning
  • displaying photographs and stories of children’s learning on centre walls that highlight
    Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.

In response to the 2012 ERO report, teachers have also explored ways to enhance the centre’s bicultural development to improve outcomes for Māori children. Staff have sought and used the knowledge of whānau of Māori children to support this development. Teachers’ use of te reo Māori has now been extended beyond mat times to the rest of the programme.

Key Next Steps

ERO agrees with the centre’s self-identified next steps for ongoing improvement. Its self-review processes could be used to:

  • clarify centre management roles and responsibilities
  • align the centre’s strategic planning to better reflect teaching practice
  • provide whole-centre professional learning and development that is focused on strengthening planning, assessment and evaluation
  • share with whānau ongoing written information about their children’s learning progress.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

To further improve practice, ERO and centre leaders agree that staff should be supported to understand changes in legislation and licensing requirements that impact on their role of ensuring children’s safety.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Titirangi Private Kindergarten - Rural Campus will be in three years. 

Graham Randell
Deputy Chief Review Officer
Northern

5 November 2015 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2  Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Henderson Valley, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

45473

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

39 children, including up to 0 aged under 2

Service roll

53

Gender composition

Boys      29
Girls       24

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
Asian

  6
46
  1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:7

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2015

Date of this report

5 November 2015

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

September 2012

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.