1/74 Oreil Avenue, West Harbour, Auckland
View on map|
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
West Harbour Playcentre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
West Harbour Playcentre operates as a parent cooperative and is licensed for 30 children, including 15 under the age of two years.
Programmes for children are underpinned by the Playcentre philosophy of parents and children playing and learning together. The vision of West Harbour Playcentre members is to affirm parents as the first and best educators of their children. They aim to empower children and adults to play, learn and grow together. Te Tiriti o Waitangi is acknowledged as a guiding document and the diversity of their Playcentre whānau is valued.
The centre is part of the newly established Northern North Island Playcentre Region. Regional systems support centre members to manage their centres and to provide educational programmes for their children. Playcentre personnel also provide adult education programmes for parents/whānau to achieve Playcentre qualifications.
ERO's 2015 report identified areas for development that included the levels of adult education, internal evaluation, the programme for infants and toddlers and bicultural practices. Centre members have responded positively and worked towards strengthening these aspects of practice.
This review was part of a cluster of 12 reviews in the Northern North Island Playcentre region.
Children lead the programme. They choose freely from a good range of easily accessible resources and quickly settle in to their play. Children confidently talk with adults about their ideas, or to request a revisit of a favoured experience or activity. They are relaxed, independent, and show a strong sense of belonging in the Playcentre environment.
Infants and toddlers are well integrated into the daily programme. All children benefit from the mixed-age setting where there are plentiful opportunities for them to be leaders or followers and to nurture each other.
Centre members enact the Playcentre philosophy well. Their interactions with children and each other are positive and collaborative. They provide good role models to support children's language development and social competence. Te reo and tikanga Māori are evident in conversations and centre routines. Centre members could now focus on how the diverse cultures of their Playcentre whānau might be more visibly woven through the programme.
Good indoor/outdoor flow provides children with opportunities to engage in physical and sensory play, or to engage in quieter play by themselves or in small groups. Adults provide meaningful opportunities for children to engage with print and to develop a love of books and storytelling.
Children's portfolios are good records of their learning. They foreground learning dispositions, identify learning that is happening and include useful links to Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum.
Parents/whānau are trialling new and innovative ways of planning their programme. They are reflective and increasingly focused on how they could bring more complexity to the learning they have identified through their observations of children.
A distributed leadership model is evident in action. Good levels of participation in Playcentre adult education are building whānau knowledge of effective ways to support children's learning through play. An improvement-focused strategic plan has been developed. The annual plan could be strengthened with the inclusion of improvement-focused action plans linking to the strategic direction. Centre members choose relevant topics for internal evaluation.
The regional structure is replacing individual Playcentre Associations. Newly appointed regional personnel are making good progress building on existing systems and establishing effective regional management structures for supporting centres. Centre support workers are guided by regional centre support coordinators. Systems are being developed for monitoring the quality of programmes for children, adult education levels, and health and safety requirements.
Centre leaders agree that key next steps for centre improvement include:
strengthening the evaluative aspect of internal evaluation
strengthening alignment between strategic and annual plans to better support the achievement of strategic goals over time
continuing to develop programme planning processes to promote children's more complex thinking and learning
continuing to strengthen centre members' knowledge and use of te reo, tikanga and te ao Māori.
The Northern North Island Playcentre regional manager (acting) and support personnel agree that key next steps include:
implementing and embedding the revised Playcentre adult education programme
establishing a framework to evaluate the effectiveness of centre support systems, roles and processes.
Before the review, the staff and management of West Harbour Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
The next ERO review of West Harbour Playcentre will be in three years.
Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services Northern
Northern Region
31 January 2019
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
|
Location |
West Harbour, Auckland |
|
|
Ministry of Education profile number |
22015 |
|
|
Licence type |
Playcentre |
|
|
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
|
|
Number licensed for |
30 children, including up to 15 aged under 2 |
|
|
Service roll |
23 |
|
|
Gender composition |
Boys 15 Girls 8 |
|
|
Ethnic composition |
Māori |
4 |
|
Review team on site |
November 2018 |
|
|
Date of this report |
31 January 2019 |
|
|
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review |
April 2015 |
|
Education Review |
June 2012 |
|
|
Education Review |
May 2009 |
|
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.
|
Not well placed |
Requires further development |
Well placed |
Very well placed |
ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.
West Harbour Playcentre is a parent-led service. The centre caters for 30 children from birth to school age and operates three morning sessions a week. The centre is well established, operating for over 50 years, and attracts members from a diverse local and wider community. It is located in a residential area that is experiencing growth and the roll has increased.
The centre operates under the organisational umbrella of Te Akoranga Playcentre Association. A liaison worker and other elected officers provide support for the centre. Association members deliver the playcentre adult education programme to help parents/whānau build their understanding about children’s learning and increase their training levels.
Playcentre philosophy is that parents are the first and best educators of their children. All members contribute to centre management and play alongside children to support their learning and development.
The 2012 ERO report highlighted how well children are supported to become independent and articulate decision makers. Areas for development included strengthening self review and increasing the complexity of learning for older children. Since the last ERO review, half of the parent members are new.
Children and parents learn together in a settled and collaborative environment. Children are well supported to become socially and emotionally competent. They benefit from mixed-age play and caring and respectful interactions with adults.
The programme offers opportunities for children to experience karakia and waiata. The centre would benefit by developing closer links with the association Roopu group and with local iwi to strengthen bicultural learning opportunities for children. This would enhance their knowledge of te ao Maori and affirm Māori children’s culture, heritage and identity.
Pacific children benefit from an inclusive environment. Cultural artefacts and learning experiences could be extended in the programme. Parents could further use each other’s language expertise and help children become experienced with other cultures.
The programme is child centred and children’s decisions are respected. Literacy features strongly in the programme. The centre is well resourced and improvements to the environment are planned. These developments should support children under two to be more active in the outdoor environment, and allow better flow indoors.
Adults are attentive and provide interesting activities to engage children. Children’s learning would benefit from a stronger focus on the language of mathematics and science. Excursions out of the centre support children’s learning. It is timely for members to consider how the programme supports older children as they prepare to transition to school.
Portfolios are individualised and contain some useful information about children’s learning. Parents are planning to make these more accessible to children as a learning resource. Analysis of learning stories could more clearly show progress for individual children and offer opportunities to enhance the programme.
Parents’ strengths and expertise are recognised, valued and incorporated into all aspects of centre operations. They are fully involved in decision making and are improvement focused. Positive relationships and collaboration are promoted and newer members welcomed and supported.
Regular parent meetings continue to build leadership capacity and support the sustainability of the service. Self-review questions guide programme reviews. The development of a strategic plan for longer term centre development would enhance and guide annual planning processes.
Flexible approaches are used by the association to support parent education. The Association uses the centre for two sessions per week under the SPACE programme for parents of infants. This helps to promote membership for this service.
Centre members agree that to enhance outcomes for children they could:
Before the review, the staff and management of West Harbour Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:
During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:
All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.
The next ERO review of West Harbour Playcentre will be in three years.
Dale Bailey
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern
30 April 2015
The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.
|
Location |
West Harbour, Auckland |
||
|
Ministry of Education profile number |
22015 |
||
|
Licence type |
Playcentre |
||
|
Licensed under |
Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008 |
||
|
Number licensed for |
30 children, including up to 15 aged under 2 |
||
|
Service roll |
39 |
||
|
Gender composition |
Boys 21 Girls 18 |
||
|
Ethnic composition |
Māori Pākehā Asian other European other |
2 28 4 3 2 |
|
|
Reported ratios of staff to children |
Under 2 |
1:1 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
Over 2 |
1:2 |
Better than minimum requirements |
|
|
Review team on site |
March 2015 |
||
|
Date of this report |
30 April 2015 |
||
|
Most recent ERO report(s) |
Education Review |
June 2012 |
|
|
Education Review |
May 2009 |
||
|
Education Review |
February 2006 |
ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:
Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.
ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.
A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.
For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.
The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:
ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.
ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.