Westport Kindergarten

Education institution number:
5408
Service type:
Free Kindergarten
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
79
Telephone:
Address:

48 A Russell Street, Westport

View on map

Westport Kindergarten

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama Indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. Judgements are made in relation to the Outcomes Indicators, Learning and Organisational Conditions. The Evaluation Judgement Rubric derived from the indicators, is used to inform ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence. 

ERO’s judgements for Westport Kindergarten are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

(What the service knows about outcomes for learners)

Whāngai Establishing

Ngā Akatoro Domains

 
Learning Conditions
Organisational Conditions

Whāngai Establishing

Whāngai Establishing

2 Context of the Service

Westport Kindergarten transitioned to the New Zealand Kindergarten network in May 2023. A recently established leadership team supports a mix of long-serving and new staff. The kindergarten is becoming increasingly culturally diverse. A quarter of children whakapapa Māori, with a small number of children from Pacific heritages. 

3 Summary of findings

Children experience a responsive curriculum, within settled learning environments, that positively supports their developing agency, independence and provides a sense of security and belonging. Teachers know whānau and children well. They engage in meaningful, positive interactions that enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. Oral language is intentionally prioritised to support children to express themselves and to learn and play well with, and alongside each other.  

Teachers are well attuned to infants’ and toddlers’ emotional and social needs and development. Intentional strategies affirm and support these children to express themselves and interact, and provide opportunities that foster their learning and wellbeing.

Recently implemented assessment, planning and evaluation, and curriculum design guide teachers’ practice. Planning is responsive to children’s interests, needs and abilities. Children’s individual journals show whānau aspirations are gathered, and learning and progress are evident. Greater intentionality is required in using Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum, learning outcomes, and integrating all children’s cultures, languages and identity through assessment documentation and the enacted curriculum. 

Improvement-focused governance and leadership support the development of systems and initiatives, and allocate resources to foster relational trust and build teacher capability. A key focus has been growing service-wide understanding in te ao Māori and engaging in a wide range of relevant professional learning aligned to the kindergarten priorities. Leaders have been building the service’s relationship with mana whenua and whānau Māori, and this now requires further embedding within this context.

Building leadership capability to enable a shift from regular and ongoing self-review to understanding internal evaluation is essential. In time, supporting teachers to develop their understanding and use of internal evaluation is required. Evaluation would help to better identify the extent to which new learning has a positive impact on outcomes for children, particularly priority learners. 

4 Improvement actions

Westport Kindergarten will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • Further support teachers to use the learning outcomes in Te Whāriki more intentionally to better show children's developing capabilities, learning and progress over time in relation to these. 
  • Deepen all children’s languages, cultures and identity through the enacted curriculum and assessment documentation.
  • Build leadership understanding of internal evaluation, to better identify the impacts of new initiatives and learning on outcomes for children, particularly priority learners. 

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Westport Kindergarten completed an ERO Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher registration; ratios)
  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

10 January 2024 

6 About the Early Childhood Service 

Early Childhood Service NameWestport Kindergarten
Profile Number5408
LocationWestport
Service type Free Kindergarten
Number licensed for96 children, including up to 12 aged under 2
Percentage of qualified teachers100%
Service roll85
Review team on siteOctober 2023 
Date of this report10 January 2024
Most recent ERO report(s)Education Review, June 2016; Education Review, May 2012.

 

Westport Kindergarten - 30/06/2016

1 Evaluation of Westport Kindergarten

How well placed is Westport Kindergarten to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Westport Kindergarten is Well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Westport Kindergarten is governed by an annually elected board of trustees made up of parents, community and Māori representation.

The centre receives very strong professional support from the Nelson/Tasman Kindergarten Association (NTKA) to help leaders and teachers improve practice to support positive learning outcomes for children.

The centre has three separate rooms for children between birth to five years of age, including a sessional programme for children aged four to five years. Within the centre’s community there is a wide range of cultures.

There are strong partnerships established with whānau to support children settling and with their ongoing learning. The two key values of whanaungatanga and manaakitanga are well embedded in centre practice.

Since the 2012 ERO review, centre leaders are continuing to strengthen self-review and assessment. They have clarified leadership and management roles and responsibilities.

The Review Findings

Caring and respectful relationships between children and with adults is supporting children’s sense of belonging. Teachers know children and their parents well. The diverse cultural backgrounds of the children and their families is recognised by teachers promoting and valuing children's language and culture within the curriculum.

The spacious physical learning environment is well presented offering challenges and interest that invite children to explore and become involved in a wide variety of activities. There is a wide range of good quality learning resources that are easily accessible for children to use in their play. Teachers have increased the availability and the use of technology. This is well integrated into the programme and supports children’s growing curiosity about the wider world.

Infant and toddlers experience a learning environment that is calm and provides unhurried routines. Children receive good quality care and attention. Positive relationships with parents ensures teachers provide good links with the home and centre. Teachers include parent opinions and ideas in the programme to support children's learning.

The child is the central focus of the curriculum. Teachers actively support children to develop self-help skills and confidence. As children progress through the centre there is a greater focus on them developing as life-long learners and greater independence in their learning.

Children benefit from a range of curriculum opportunities offered. These include literacy and numeracy, science, music, art and meaningful bicultural practices.

Teachers are making extensive use of an external on-line system for planning and assessment that has had positive impacts on children’s learning and on improving teaching practice. The most positive impacts have been:

  • a greater focus on planning for individuals and acknowledging their emerging interests
  • increased participation and contributions of parents and extended family to the child’s learning
  • the inclusion of parents in planning and setting goals
  • greater consistency of planning and teaching practices within teams
  • more collaborative planning and assessment
  • visible links between home and centre learning.

Good relationships are fostering positive communication with parents of Māori children. All children have opportunities to experience and use te reo Māori in meaningful ways. Support from external advisors is helping teachers to build greater understanding and knowledge about te ao Māori. More deliberate questioning about Māori parents aspirations for their children will provide focused direction for centre planning.

Leadership roles have increased to include curriculum and educational leaders. The focus is on building whole team culture and developing collaborative and consistent practices in the centre. This is having a positive impact on improving planning and assessment focused on the best learning outcomes for children.

An appraisal process is well used to support and increase teachers expertise. A number of strategies and processes, including critical feedback from external appraisers, is in place to assure leaders and the board of the focus on continuous improvement in teaching and learning.

Transitions are personalised to the individual child’s needs and stages. They are carefully managed with the involvement of parents.

Leaders are focused on improving the quality of education and care through on-going self-review. They are making good use of the guidelines from the NTKA to support their practice. Leaders and teachers benefit from regular, targeted and purposeful professional development.

A committed board, made up of dedicated parents, are highly supportive of children, leaders and teachers. Quality management systems are used by the board to guide the operation of the centre.

Key Next Steps

The leaders and ERO agree that the next steps to improve consistency across the centre include:

  • embedding planning and assessment
  • developing further self-review practices
  • continue to strengthen strategic planning and new leadership practices.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Westport Kindergarten will be in three years.

Lesley Patterson

Deputy Chief Review Officer Southern

30 June 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

LocationWestport
Ministry of Education profile number5408
Licence typeFree Kindergarten
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for96 children, including up to 12 aged under two
Service roll114
Gender compositionGirls 56%; Boys 44%
Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Other ethnicities

11%

79%

10%

Percentage of qualified teachers 0-49% 50-79% 80%+Based on funding rates80% +
Reported ratios of staff to childrenUnder 21:4Better than minimum requirements
Over 21:10Meets minimum requirements
Review team on siteJune 2016
Date of this report30 June 2016
Most recent ERO reports Education ReviewMay 2012
Education ReviewAugust 2008

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Westport Kindergarten - 30/05/2012

1 The Education Review Office (ERO) Evaluation

Westport Kindergarten operates under the constitution of the Westport Kindergarten Association. It is the only kindergarten in the local community. The governing board is responsible for long-term planning to guide the day-to-day management of the kindergarten. Aspects of the kindergarten’s operation are managed by the Nelson District Free Kindergarten Association.

The kindergarten currently operates half day sessions for up to 46 children over the age of two years old. All teachers are qualified and registered early childhood teachers.

Positive features of this kindergarten include:

  • the emphasis teachers place on developing meaningful relationships with children and their families/whānau, and between children
  • the effective ways that teachers extend children’s thinking and problem-solving skills, and support their communication and oral language development
  • an interesting and varied programme that helps children develop confidence, become more independent, and learn about aspects of the local community.

Since the August 2008 ERO review, teachers have made significant progress in providing increased opportunities for children to hear and use te reo Māori and develop their understandings of aspects of Māori culture.

The teachers work as a reflective team, making good use of opportunities to discuss children’s learning and progress, and aspects of the programme. They have reliably identified that their next steps are to strengthen self review, and aspects of assessment and planning practices.

The kindergarten is well organised and managed. It operates under a useful set of policies and procedures for monitoring health and safety.

The kindergarten board functions well. It is focused on improving children’s access to high-quality early childhood education across the region. As a result, trustees are undertaking several projects to establish new early childhood facilities. The board acknowledges that as it expands its responsibilities, it will be important to ensure that effective board self-review systems are well established.

Future Action

ERO is confident that the service is being managed in the interest of the children. Therefore ERO is likely to review the service again in three years.

2 Review Priorities

The Focus of the Review

Before the review, the management of Westport Kindergarten was invited to consider its priorities for review using guidelines and resources provided by ERO. ERO also used documentation provided by the centre to contribute to the scope of the review.

The detailed priorities for review were then determined following a discussion between the ERO review team and the management and staff. This discussion focused on existing information held by the centre (including self-review information) and the extent to which potential issues for review contributed to positive outcomes for children atWestport Kindergarten.

All ERO education reviews in early childhood focus on the quality of education. For ERO this includes the quality of:

  • the programme provided for children
  • the learning environment
  • the interactions between children and adults.

ERO’s findings in these areas are set out below.

The Quality of Education

Background

The kindergarten’s philosophy is based on developing meaningful relationships with children, their families and the community. Teachers aim to provide a child-driven programme that emphasises children as active participants in their own learning.

Areas of strength

Effective relationships are a key feature of the kindergarten. Teachers place particular emphasis on supporting positive relationships through the curriculum. ERO observed:

  • warm and affirming relationships between children and their teachers
  • welcoming and supportive interactions between teachers and parents
  • teachers sharing useful information about children and working in collaborative ways
  • children playing cooperatively for sustained period of time.

Teachers relate to children in effective ways to extend their learning and thinking. They involve themselves regularly in children’s play and encourage them to talk about their ideas. They ask relevant questions to help children extend their thinking and problem-solving skills. Teachers know children well and refer to their families and home lives when they talk with children. This provides ongoing opportunities to develop children’s oral language and communication skills.

Children benefit from an interesting and varied programme that is responsive to their interests.

They have good opportunities to:

  • initiate and follow their own play interests and develop independence skills
  • explore a wide range of equipment and resources
  • learn about the local community, its people and facilities.

ERO observed children who confidently used all areas of the programme and who were well engaged in their play and learning.

Teachers have made significant progress since the 2008 ERO review in providing increased opportunities for children to hear and use te reo Māori and develop their understandings of aspects of Māori culture. Teachers include bicultural practices regularly in the programme and daily routines.

The teachers are a well led and reflective team. They engage in ongoing professional development. They regularly discuss children’s learning and progress. Teachers make good use of their individual strengths to support each other and extend children’s experiences. Teachers value the significant support from the board that allows them to develop their professional and personal skills, and be actively involved in community work.

Children’s well-being and learning is being supported by the strong links between the kindergarten and local community. Board and staff maintain effective networks and relationships within the community that help to provide extra resources and expertise to support the kindergarten’s ongoing development. This includes well-established relationships with local primary schools.

The board is focused on improving children’s access to high-quality early childhood education in the region. Board members have a well-informed understanding of their governance roles. They are responsive to the changing needs of the community and have undertaken several projects to establish new early childhood facilities in the local district. The board has appropriately focused on:

  • using well-targeted management and advisory support
  • ensuring the ongoing renovation and maintenance of facilities, such as extensive playground development
  • prioritising professional development and training for the board and all staff.
Areas for development and review

The board, managers and teachers have reliably identified many of the next steps to improve outcomes for children. These include strengthening self review and assessment practices.

Teachers have identified, and ERO agrees, that they are in the early stages of using a more formal, in-depth self-review process to evaluate aspects of their programme and practices. This should provide clearer documentation of their self-review processes.

The board trustees have also acknowledged that they are in the early stages of trialling new self-review systems to review their effectiveness. The development of these systems will provide clearer documentation of their self review.

Teachers are appropriately focused on improving assessment and programme planning practices.

This includes consistency in how well teachers:

  • write learning stories
  • include the views of children and their families in learning records
  • record children’s progress in learning.

Teachers should more clearly evaluate their planning to determine the effectiveness of the strategies they are using to extend children’s interests. This could also include reviewing how well they use information and communication technologies (ICT) to support children’s learning.

3 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff of Westport Kindergarten completed an ERO CentreAssurance Statement andSelf-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • administration;
  • health, safety and welfare;
  • personnel management; and
  • financial and property management.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s documentation, including policies, procedures and records of recent use of procedures. ERO also checked elements of the following areas that have a potentially high impact on outcomes for children:

  • emotional safety (including behaviour management, prevention of bullying and abuse);
  • physical safety (including behaviour management, sleeping and supervision practices; accidents and medication; hygiene and routines; travel and excursion policies and procedures);
  • staff qualifications and organisation; and
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

4 Future Action

ERO is confident that the service is being managed in the interest of the children. Therefore ERO is likely to review the service again in three years.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services

Southern Region

About the Centre

TypeAll Day Kindergarten
Licensed underEducation (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008
Number licensed for46 children, aged over two
Roll number91
Gender composition

Girls 59

Boys 32

Ethnic composition

New Zealand European/Pākehā 71

Māori 13

Other Ethnicities 7

Review team on siteApril 2012
Date of this report30 May 2012
Previous three ERO reports

Education Review August 2008

Education Review June 2005

Accountability Review April 1998

To the Parents and Community of Westport Kindergarten

These are the findings of the Education Review Office’s latest report on Westport Kindergarten.

Westport Kindergarten operates under the constitution of the Westport Kindergarten Association. It is the only kindergarten in the local community. The governing board is responsible for long-term planning to guide the day-to-day management of the kindergarten. Aspects of the kindergarten’s operation are managed by the Nelson District Free Kindergarten Association.

The kindergarten currently operates half day sessions for up to 46 children over the age of two years old. All teachers are qualified and registered early childhood teachers.

Positive features of this kindergarten include:

  • the emphasis teachers place on developing meaningful relationships with children and their families/whānau, and between children
  • the effective ways that teachers extend children’s thinking and problem-solving skills, and support their communication and oral language development
  • an interesting and varied programme that helps children develop confidence, become more independent, and learn about aspects of the local community.

Since the August 2008 ERO review, teachers have made significant progress in providing increased opportunities for children to hear and use te reo Māori and develop their understandings of aspects of Māori culture.

The teachers work as a reflective team, making good use of opportunities to discuss children’s learning and progress, and aspects of the programme. They have reliably identified that their next steps are to strengthen self review, and aspects of assessment and planning practices.

The kindergarten is well organised and managed. It operates under a useful set of policies and procedures for monitoring health and safety.

The kindergarten board functions well. It is focused on improving children’s access to high-quality early childhood education across the region. As a result, trustees are undertaking several projects to establish new early childhood facilities. The board acknowledges that as it expands its responsibilities, it will be important to ensure that effective board self-review systems are well established.

Future Action

ERO is confident that the service is being managed in the interest of the children. Therefore ERO is likely to review the service again in three years.

When ERO has reviewed an early childhood centre we encourage management to inform their community of any follow up action they plan to take. You should talk to the management or contact person if you have any questions about this evaluation, the full ERO report or their future intentions.

If you would like a copy of the full report, please contact the centre or see the ERO website, http://www.ero.govt.nz.

Graham Randell

National Manager Review Services

Southern Region

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT REVIEWS

About ERO

ERO is an independent, external evaluation agency that undertakes reviews of schools and early childhood services throughout New Zealand.

About ERO Reviews

ERO follows a set of standard procedures to conduct reviews. The purpose of each review is to:

  • improve quality of education for children in early childhood centres; and
  • provide information to parents, communities and the Government.

Reviews are intended to focus on outcomes for children and build on each centre’s self review.

Review Focus

ERO’s framework for reviewing and reporting is based on four review strands.

  • Quality of Education – including the quality of the programme provided for children, the quality of the learning environment and the quality of the interactions between staff and children and how these impact on outcomes for children.
  • Additional Review Priorities – other aspects of the operation of a centre, may be included in the review. ERO will not include this strand in all reviews.
  • Compliance with Legal Requirements – assurance that this centre has taken all reasonable steps to meet legal requirements.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews do not cover every aspect of centre performance and each ERO report may cover different issues. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to this centre.

Review Recommendations

Most ERO reports include recommendations for improvement. A recommendation on a particular issue does not necessarily mean that a centre is performing poorly in relation to that issue. There is no direct link between the number of recommendations in this report and the overall performance of this centre.