Tamariki Garden Early Learning Centre

Education institution number:
25239
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
37
Telephone:
Address:

121 Beach Road, Papakura

View on map

Tamariki Garden Early Learning Centre

1 ERO’s Judgements

Akarangi | Quality Evaluation evaluates the extent to which this early childhood service has the learning and organisational conditions to support equitable and excellent outcomes for all learners. Te Ara Poutama- indicators of quality for early childhood education: what matters most (PDF 3.01MB) are the basis for making judgements about the effectiveness of the service in achieving equity and excellence for all learners. The Akarangi Quality Evaluation Judgement Rubric (PDF 91.30KB) derived from the indicators, is used to inform the ERO’s judgements about this service’s performance in promoting equity and excellence.

ERO’s judgements for Tamariki Garden Early Learning Centre are as follows:

Outcome Indicators

ERO’s judgement

What the service knows about outcomes for learners

Whāngai Establishing

Ngā Akatoro Domains

ERO’s judgement

He Whāriki Motuhake

The learner and their learning

Whāngai Establishing

Whakangungu Ngaio

Collaborative professional learning builds knowledge and capability

Whakaū Embedding

Ngā Aronga Whai Hua

Evaluation for improvement

Whāngai Establishing

Kaihautū

Leaders foster collaboration and improvement

Whāngai Establishing

Te Whakaruruhau

Stewardship through effective governance and management

Whāngai Establishing

2 Context of the Service

Tamariki Garden Early Learning Centre is a privately owned and operated education and care service. The service was previously known as XL Preschool and has been under new ownership since 2018. The owner/centre manager leads a team of six staff. Children are from diverse cultural backgrounds.

3 Summary of findings

Infants and toddlers have space and time to lead their own learning. Kaiako who work with younger children maintain a calm, slow pace. They are responsive to children’s verbal and non-verbal cues and signals.

Leaders and kaiako respect and respond to the cultural identities and languages of children and their parents and whānau. They seek ways to maintain children’s connections to, and fluency in their home languages and culture. They are beginning to integrate the languages and cultures of Māori and Pacific children throughout the curriculum.

Kaiako teaching practices enable all children to participate fully in the curriculum alongside their peers. They are well supported to develop the skills necessary to be able to discuss and negotiate rights, fairness and justice. Kaiako actively promote the building and development of children’s independence and self-management skills.

Learning environments encourage wonder and exploration. Children experience activities that challenge their thinking and support their development. Kaiako intentionally recognise and promote children’s understanding of mathematical and literacy concepts in everyday contexts. Kaiako have the time needed to develop positive relationships with each child, their parents and whānau.

Leaders have given consideration and responded to how qualifications of teachers, space, group size and premises support the provision of quality education and care. They have developed systems, processes and practices that, when fully implemented, will support this decision making and contribute to an increased focus on what is happening for children and their learning.

4 Improvement actions

Tamariki Garden Early Learning Centre will include the following actions in its Quality Improvement Planning:

  • ensure kaiako practice is consistent with the competencies in Tapasā to further promote an intentional and culturally responsive curriculum
  • develop an effective appraisal system aligned to the New Zealand Teaching Council Professional Growth Cycle
  • strengthen evaluation, inquiry and knowledge building in the systems, processes and practices, using appropriate tools and methods for evaluation and improvement purposes.

5 Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Tamariki Garden Early Learning Centre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Steve Tanner
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

7 July 2021

6 About the Early Childhood Service

Early Childhood Service Name Tamariki Garden Early Learning Centre
Profile Number 25239
Location Papakura, Auckland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 10 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

80%+

Service roll

34

Ethnic composition

Māori 12
NZ European/Pākehā 7
Samoan 4
other Pacific 5
other ethnic groups 6

Review team on site

April 2021

Date of this report

7 July 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, November 2016
Education Review, May 2013

XL Preschool - 11/11/2016

1 Evaluation of XL Preschool

How well placed is XL Preschool to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

XL Preschool provides all-day education and care for up to 35 children, including 10 up to two years old. Children are catered for in two separate age related groups. Teachers have built close and reciprocal relationships with families.

The centre is privately owned and operates from an adapted house in Papakura. The owner has 30 years experience as a qualified early childhood teacher. She shares leadership roles with the centre supervisor. The centre has registered teachers supported by several unqualified staff members. Teaching staff reflect the diverse cultures of the local community.

The multicultural centre's philosophy focuses on developing children's sense of belonging and wellbeing. This supports children to become confident communicators, to learn about their culture and to participate in and contribute to the programme.

The 2013 ERO report noted children's eagerness to learn in a well-resourced environment. Priorities identified for improvement included further developing the appraisal system, and refining self-review practices. Progress has been made in these areas.

The Review Findings

Children are settled and are familiar with routines. They have good access to a wide variety of resources. Children have trusting and respectful relationships with teachers. They are confident explorers and direct their own play. Children are supported to have conversations and to develop oral language skills.

Infants and toddlers freely explore the environment. Primary caregivers provide these young children with individual nurturing and care, and they keep in close contact with parents and whānau. Teachers support interactions with older children through play and encouraging tuakana teina relationships.

Children engage readily in play using a variety of resources, and they make good use of the indoor and outdoor environments. Leaders and teachers could review and adapt programme planning to more particularly focus on learning outcomes for individual children. Such a focus would help to extend children's learning.

Teachers believe in children as capable, confident learners. They record children's participation in the programme in individual assessment portfolios. Centre leaders recognise the need to relate portfolio information more to the child's learning journey in relation to developing dispositions and skills. This change could help parents to see their child's progress over time.

Teachers are developing their knowledge and use of te reo Māori. Some teachers confidently integrate te reo Māori into the daily programme, especially during mat times.

Leaders and teachers know children and families well. They are responsive to whānau and provide opportunities for parents to be included in the programme. Parents spoke very positively about the responsive and individualised support they receive from leaders and teachers.

Centre leaders are refining administrative systems so that management and leadership operations are transparent and relevant. They know the capabilities of teachers and offer leadership opportunities for teachers to build the centre's leadership capacity. Centre leaders acknowledge that teachers' appraisal goals could align more with the centre's strategic goals while maintaining a focus on improving outcomes for children.

The centre's philosophy is underpinned by the principles of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. It is currently under review and parents are being consulted as part of this process. The review would benefit from leaders and teachers evaluating how well the preschool programme aligns with Te Whāriki.

Key Next Steps

Next steps to support centre improvement include centre leaders:

  • reviewing and adapting programme planning and assessment to promote children's learning dispositions and skills

  • developing the documentation of the centre's strategic priorities to guide the monitoring of progress towards these goals

  • aligning teachers' appraisal goals and professional development with the centre's strategic priorities

  • further developing self-review practices to promote positive outcomes for children.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of XL Preschool completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of XL Preschool will be in three years.

Graham Randell

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern

11 November 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Papakura, Auckland

Ministry of Education profile number

25239

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

35 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Service roll

33

Gender composition

Boys 21 Girls 12

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

Indian

African

Cook Island Māori

3

24

3

2

1

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

August 2016

Date of this report

11 November 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

May 2013

Education Review

March 2010

Education Review

February 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.