Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust

Education institution number:
11207
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
46
Telephone:
Address:

Norfolk Place, Kerikeri

View on map

Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed non-compliances and is now taking reasonable steps to meet regulatory standards.

Background

Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust is owned by two qualified teachers who also have a role as trustees. Together they are responsible for the daily operations of the service and leading a team of 15 qualified teachers. At the time of this review, over a quarter of the children enrolled at the service were Māori.

Summary of Review Findings

The service curriculum is informed by assessment, planning and evaluation that demonstrate an understanding of children’s interests, whānau, and life contexts. It is responsive to children as confident and competent learners. Children’s preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their learning experiences.

Kaiako engage in meaningful, positive interactions to nurture reciprocal relationships. They provide children with a range of experiences and opportunities to enhance and extend their learning and development.

The service’s curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua. Children are given the opportunity to develop knowledge and an understanding of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Key Next Steps

Next steps include:

  • making children’s languages, cultures and identity more visible within curriculum assessment and planning documentation

  • updating the service’s philosophy to better reflect relevant theories of practice in early childhood education. 

Actions for Compliance

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows the following non-compliances have been addressed:

  • Ensuring items that could fall or topple and cause serious injury are secured (HS6).

  • Having consistent documentation that shows the time each child attending the service sleeps, and the checks made by adults during that time (HS9).

  • Maintaining excursion records which contain evidence of parental approval of the adult: child ratios for special excursions (HS17).

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review is likely to be an Akarangi | Quality Evaluation.

Patricia Davey
Director of Early Childhood Education (ECE)

15 September 2023

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust

Profile Number

11207

Location

Kerikeri, Northland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 12 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

58

Review team on site

July 2023

Date of this report

15 September 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Akanuku | Assurance Review, December 2021; Education Review, August 2017

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Not meeting

Health and safety

Not meeting

Governance, management and administration

Meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified non-compliance with regulatory standards that must be addressed.

Background

Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust provides individualised education and care for infants, toddlers, and young children from the local community. Kaiako and managers are all registered teachers. The service uses resources of the surrounding industrial area as part of its localised curriculum.

Summary of Review Findings

Adults providing education and care engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. Children’s preferences are respected, and they are involved in decisions about their experiences. Positive actions are taken to respect and acknowledge the aspirations held by parents and whānau for their children.

The service curriculum supports children’s developing social competence and understanding of appropriate behaviour. Adults provide a language-rich environment that supports children’s learning. The curriculum acknowledges and reflects the unique place of Māori as tangata whenua.

Consistent implementation of health and safety practices is required to meet all aspects of regulatory compliance.

Actions for Compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • the outdoor activity space is enclosed by structures and/or fences and gates designed to ensure that children are not able to leave the premises without the knowledge of adults providing education and care
  • the premises located in a building that has a current fire evacuation scheme that is approved by the New Zealand Fire Service.
    Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, PF13, HS4.

Since the onsite visit the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Adults providing education and care to be familiar with relevant emergency drills and carry these out with the children on an at least a three-monthly basis (HS8).
  • A procedure for monitoring children’s sleep ensures that children do not have access to food or liquids while in bed and are checked for warmth, breathing, and general wellbeing at least every 5 to 10 minutes, or more frequently according to individual needs (HS9).
  • Equipment, premises, and facilities are checked every day of operation for hazards to children (HS12).
  • Water stored in any hot water cylinder to be kept at a temperature of at least 60 degrees Celsius (HS14).
  • A record of excursions that includes information specified in the licensing criteria (HS17).
  • Evidence of parental permission for any travel by motor vehicle (HS18).
  • Rooms used by children are kept at a comfortable temperature no lower than 18 degrees Celsius (at 500mm above the floor) while children are attending (HS24).
  • Evidence that parents have been informed of any accident or injury to their child (HS27).
  • A written child protection policy that meets the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014 provisions for the service’s identification and reporting of child abuse and neglect (HS31).
  • A written procedure for safety checking all children’s workers before they have access to children that meets the safety checking requirements of the Children’s Act 2014. All children’s workers who have access to children are safety checked, the results of the safety checks must be recorded, and the record kept as long as the person is employed at the service (GMA7A).

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends the Ministry follows up with the service provider to ensure that non-compliances identified in this report are addressed promptly.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Phil Cowie
Acting Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

8 December 2021 

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust

Profile Number

11207

Location

Kerikeri, Northland

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

50 children, including up to 12 aged under 2.

Percentage of qualified teachers

100%

Service roll

66

Ethnic composition

Māori 23, NZ European/Pākehā 38, South African 5

Review team on site

July 2021

Date of this report

8 December 2021

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review, August 2017
Education Review, March 2014

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation
  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’
  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence
  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership
  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulated standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher certification; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service
  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems
  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust - 31/08/2017

1 Evaluation of Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust

How well placed is Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust operates in a spacious facility in a commercial area and provides for up to 40 children including 12 up to two years of age. The well established centre is governed by a trust. The two trustees are fully involved in teaching and in the daily management of the centre.

Children of similar ages play and learn together in three defined areas within the building. The centre maintains high ratios of teachers to children. Teachers are well qualified and have worked together for some time.

The centre's philosophy has been developed around the themes of partnership, protection and participation. It aims to promote partnerships with parents, to protect the child's right to play and learn through active exploration and to foster participation by providing a safe environment through the development of children's social competencies. Children are seen as capable individuals who bring prior knowledge and their whānau with them. They also contribute to each other's learning and development.

The 2014 ERO report noted strengths in the care of infants, relationships and learning interactions that encouraged children's thinking skills. These good practices continue to be evident. Aspects of management and teachers' planning were identified as areas for development. Good progress has been made in these areas.

The Review Findings

Children experience high quality education and care during their time at the centre. They have a strong sense of belonging. Children's learning benefits from the positive social and emotional climate that teachers provide by working together as a team. Children direct their own play and have confidence in themselves as learners.

Infants form strong, genuine attachments to their teachers and are well cared for. The environment and interactions with teachers promote children's oral language, exploration and wellbeing. As a result, infants and toddlers are confident and very settled.

Children have very good opportunities to learn through their play. They choose from a wide range of good quality resources. The inviting indoor and outdoor environments provide many opportunities for imaginative play and for children to challenge themselves. Groups of children cooperate and collaborate as they learn, while also having good opportunities to play individually.

Teachers ensure they know children well as learners. They affirm children as thinkers, planners and problem solvers through high quality interactions. Teachers plan programmes and provocations based on children's interests and the aspirations whānau have for their learning.

The development of children's early literacy and numeracy skills is well supported and promoted within children's play. Children's language development benefits from teachers modelling language patterns and vocabulary through rich conversations. Teachers integrate oral and written te reo Māori naturally into programmes throughout the day.

Teachers promote increased independence and the development of appropriate early literacy and numeracy skills for children who are approaching school age. Regular, planned school visits support children's smooth transitions to school.

Managers and teachers extend and support children's learning through strong partnerships with children's whānau. The strength of relationships between teachers and parents is such that teachers are also considered whānau.

The experienced centre leaders take a thoughtful approach to incorporating aspects of theory into their practice. They ensure any new approaches are supported by research about children's learning and development and are appropriate for the Aotearoa New Zealand setting. Consequently children have many opportunities to learn through a rich curriculum.

Trustees share a strong sense of responsibility for providing high quality education and care. Children's wellbeing and learning are at the heart of management decisions. Management systems and processes are aligned with the centre's strategic goals.

There is a focus on finding ways to work with children that will ensure the philosophy is fully brought to life. Teachers give each other honest feedback and use this information to reflect on their practice and their contribution to the centre. Trustees and teachers use planned and spontaneous internal evaluation very well to support ongoing improvement.

Key Next Steps

Centre leaders agree that areas for ongoing improvement include:

  • further refining strategic and annual planning processes
  • networking with other centres to share aspects of practice and to influence the early learning sector. 

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Kerikeri Community Childcare Trust will be in four years. 

Violet Tu’uga Stevenson
Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

31 August 2017 

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning. 

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service 

Location

Kerikeri

Ministry of Education profile number

11207

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children, including up to 12 aged under 2

Service roll

48

Gender composition

Boys      29
Girls       19

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
other

14
30
  4

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49%       50-79%       80%+

Based on funding rates

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

1:3

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

June 2017

Date of this report

31 August 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

 

Education Review

March 2014

Education Review

February 2011

Education Review

September 2007

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau. 

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.