Seeds and Sprouts Childcare Ltd

Education institution number:
46096
Service type:
Education and Care Service
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
45
Telephone:
Address:

15 Moody Avenue, Whau Valley, Whangarei

View on map

Seeds and Sprouts Childcare Ltd

ERO’s Akanuku | Assurance Review reports provide information about whether a service meets and maintains regulatory standards. Further information about Akanuku | Assurance Reviews is included at the end of this report.

ERO’s Judgement

Regulatory standards

ERO’s judgement

Curriculum

Meeting

Premises and facilities

Meeting

Health and safety

Not meeting

Governance, management and administration

Not meeting

At the time of the review, ERO identified areas of non-compliance with regulatory standards that are an unacceptable risk to children.

Background

Seeds and Sprouts Childcare Ltd is a privately owned service. Since ERO’s previous review in 2018, there has been a change of ownership. One of the new owners oversees daily operations in the role of centre manager. At the time of the review a third of the children enrolled are of Māori heritage.

Summary of Review Findings

The service’s curriculum is inclusive and responsive to children as confident and competent learners. Children’s preferences are respected, and they are involved in decision making about their learning.

Adults engage in meaningful, positive interactions to enhance children’s learning and nurture reciprocal relationships. They provide a language rich environment which supports learning.  The place of Māori as tangata whenua is acknowledged. Children are provided with opportunities to develop their knowledge and understanding of the cultural heritages of both parties to Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Regular opportunities are provided to parents to be involved in decision making concerning their children’s learning. Leaders now need to strengthen monitoring processes to ensure compliance against regulatory standards is maintained.

Actions for Compliance

ERO found areas of non-compliance in the service relating to:

  • ensuring adults providing education and care carry out relevant emergency drills on an, at least,
    three-monthly basis

  • ensuring equipment and premises are checked on every day of operation for hazards to children that include all requirements of this criterion and that hazards are mitigated

  • having a written procedure for safety checking children’s workers and a record of safety checks which shows periodic rechecking of staff every three years.

[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, HS8, HS12, GMA7A]

Since the onsite visit, the service has provided ERO with evidence that shows it has addressed the following non-compliances:

  • Ensuring first aid kits comply with the requirements of Appendix 1 (PF28).

  • Having a space for sleeping children under the age of two which allows for adequate supervision (PF37).

  • When children leave the premises on an excursion, parents have given prior written approval of the proposed ratios and a person responsible signature is sought (HS17).

  • Having a record of training and/or information provided to adults who administer medication to children other than their own while at the service (HS29).

  • Documenting an annual plan which identifies the ‘who’ in relation to key tasks undertaken each year (GMA8).

  • Ensuring attendance records are maintained which meets the requirements outlined in the Early Childhood Education Funding Handbook (GMA11).

Recommendation to Ministry of Education

ERO recommends that the Ministry reassess the licence issued to this service provider. ERO will not undertake a further review of this service until the Ministry of Education is satisfied that the service meets regulatory standards.

Next ERO Review

The next ERO review will be in consultation with the Ministry of Education.

Filivaifale Jason Swann
Director Review and Improvement Services (Northern)
Northern Region | Te Tai Raki

28 March 2023

Information About the Service

Early Childhood Service Name

Seeds and Sprouts Childcare Ltd

Profile Number

46096

Location

Whau Valley, Whangarei

Service type

Education and care service

Number licensed for

40 children, including up to 10 aged under 2

Percentage of qualified teachers

80-99%

Service roll

67

Review team on site

January 2023

Date of this report

28 March 2023

Most recent ERO report(s)

Previously reviewed as: BJ’s Childcare (Ltd):

Education Review, August 2018
Education Review, October 2014

General Information about Assurance Reviews

All services are licensed under the Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008. The legal requirements for early childhood services also include the Licensing Criteria for Education and Care Services 2008.

Services must meet the standards in the regulations and the requirements of the licensing criteria to gain and maintain a licence to operate.

ERO undertakes an Akanuku | Assurance Review process in any centre-based service:

  • having its first ERO review – including if it is part of a governing organisation

  • previously identified as ‘not well placed’ or ‘requiring further development’

  • that has moved from a provisional to a full licence

  • that have been re-licenced due to a change of ownership

  • where an Akanuku | Assurance Review process is determined to be appropriate.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

All early childhood services are required to promote children’s health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements. Before the review, the staff and management of a service completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO assesses whether the regulatory standards are being met. In particular, ERO looks at a service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; safety checking; teacher certification; ratios)

  • relevant evacuation procedures and practices.

As part of an Akanuku | Assurance Review ERO also gathers and records evidence through:

  • discussions with those involved in the service

  • consideration of relevant documentation, including the implementation of health and safety systems

  • observations of the environment/premises, curriculum implementation and teaching practice.

BJ's Childcare (Ltd) - 07/08/2018

1 Evaluation of BJ's Childcare (Ltd)

How well placed is BJ's Childcare (Ltd) to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

BJ's Childcare (Ltd) in Whau Valley, Whāngarei, caters for up to 40 children from two to six years of age. Māori children make up 70 percent of the roll.

The centre's philosophy aims to provide opportunities for children to become confident in their cultural identity, particularly Māori children. It recognises the development of the whole child as important to establishing a positive attitude and approach to learning. It promotes respectful relationships with children and their families in a homely setting.

The centre manager leads a team of three registered and two untrained teachers, including one teacher in-training. She is responsible for the planning and provision of teaching and learning programmes. Together with the director/owner, she oversees the day-to-day operation of the centre and teaches alongside staff.

Positive features identified in the 2014 ERO report continue to be evident. Very good progress has been made towards the recommendations from that report, particularly in professional leadership, teacher appraisal processes, and teachers fostering individual children's interests.

The Review Findings

Children are happy and confident in the centre where their cultural identity and language are affirmed. They have very good relationships with teachers and consistently engage in play that interests them. Children's independence is fostered through many opportunities to make choices, develop self-help skills and use their musical talents.

Children enthusiastically explore the environment, often playing in small groups, communicating respectfully with each other and responding well to adult support. They benefit from uncluttered indoor spaces and a good variety of natural and open-ended resources.

Teachers know children very well. They respond to individual interests and are sensitive and responsive to children with additional learning needs. Adults' conversations with children encourage them to share their ideas and sustain their play for long periods. Teachers often integrate te reo Māori and foster the use of children's first languages. They support children to develop early literacy and numeracy skills in meaningful ways.

Leaders and teachers maintain strong, trusting relationships with families. They are highly responsive to the social, emotional and physical needs of the centre community. Respect for Māori culture and taonga provides a sense of belonging for all. Leaders consult families informally and through surveys about teachers' planning and children's learning. The centre provides a digital portal for families to access learning stories.

Teachers purposefully discuss children's interests and learning. They meet regularly to plan responses to children's overarching interests. Teachers have identified the need to strengthen their focus on individual children's interests and use this information to develop continuity in learning stories. They are using Te Whāriki 2017, the revised early childhood curriculum, to support programme planning. Teachers value the ways in which their centre philosophy aligns with Te Whāriki. They recognise that they should become more explicit about learning outcomes for children when they evaluate programmes.

Leaders use a sound policy framework and appropriate health and safety systems to guide centre operations. These key documents are regularly reviewed. Leaders consult with teachers and parents to involve them in decision making. They foster professional development to encourage teachers to undertake individual inquiries into their practice. Leaders recognise the need to further refine processes for teachers' appraisals. Teachers need to document and further develop the processes for the evaluation of their teaching practice.

Centre leaders work collaboratively with staff and parents to develop and monitor the centre's strategic direction. The team is now reviewing the strategic plan to better incorporate Te Tiriti o Waitangi and the centre philosophy.

Key Next Steps

Key next steps to support ongoing improvement include:

  • planning for more deliberate teaching strategies that will challenge children's thinking, add complexity to their learning and focus more on learning and less on activities

  • reviewing the philosophy and strategic plan to develop a clearer alignment with the centre's valued outcomes for children

  • continuing to use Tātaiako, to promote and support the development of teachers' bicultural teaching practices.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of BJ's Childcare (Ltd) completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of BJ's Childcare (Ltd) will be in three years.

Julie Foley

Deputy Chief Review Officer Northern (Acting)

Te Tai Raki - Northern Region

7 August 2018

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Whau Valley, Whangarei

Ministry of Education profile number

46096

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

40 children aged 2 years and over

Service roll

33

Gender composition

Girls 17 Boys 16

Ethnic composition

Māori
Pākehā
other

23
9
1

Percentage of qualified teachers

80% +

Reported ratios of staff to children

Over 2

1:8

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2018

Date of this report

7 August 2018

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

October 2014

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

BJ's Childcare (Ltd) - 08/10/2014

1 Evaluation of BJ's Childcare (Ltd)

How well placed is BJ's Childcare (Ltd) to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

BJ’s Childcare (Ltd.) is a newly developed, privately owned service that is aligned with BJ’s Home-Based Childcare Services operating from the same venue. The centre provides full day care for 30 children over the age of two years.

Children mainly come from Māori and Pākehā families. Recently families from the Pacific Islands have been welcomed into the centre. The centre’s philosophy is to promote respectful relationships with children and their families. The philosophy also values children as unique individuals.

Most of the teachers are qualified. As the centre is not yet operating at full capacity, teachers work part-time hours over the week. The owners are responsible for management frameworks for the two services, and a manager has responsibility for this centre.

This is the centre’s first ERO review.

The Review Findings

Children and their families are welcomed when they arrive at the centre. Parents are comfortable to stay with their children and share in their play. Children settle well into exploring the environment with their friends. They have engaging conversations about their interests with teachers. Children help set up the environment and confidently share their ideas for challenges in the playground.

Children learn literacy and mathematical skills in meaningful play contexts. Print-rich displays and literacy resources prompt children to write and enjoy books. Games, resources and language add to children’s understanding about mathematical concepts.

A challenge for teachers has been managing the specific needs of young children, and older children needing extension in their learning experiences. Teachers are working to spend more time settling younger, less confident children. They are also working on extending their conversations with older children nearing school age. These strategies are likely to help teachers to better meet children’s individual learning needs.

Parents appreciate reading about their children’s progress in assessment portfolios and on-line stories about children at play. Electronic links are providing a useful way for parents to comment about their child’s learning. Teachers recognise the need to include parent/whānau aspirations for their children in programme planning. They could also focus more on children’s individual interests in portfolios.

Teachers are strengthening te reo and tikanga Māori understanding for themselves and children. The environment includes reference to Te Ao Māori and teachers are increasingly using te reo Māori with children. External advice could help teachers to create the bicultural programmes and environments they are planning.

A shared leadership model provides opportunities for teachers to take responsibility for projects and programme management. Professional learning is developing individual teachers’ knowledge of theories of early childhood education.

Well-developed management processes are regularly reviewed by teachers. Whānau are also invited to contribute to these reviews. Teachers are becoming more confident in evaluating practices to guide positive changes for children. They could review the centre’s philosophy to create a more considered, agreed and consistent approach to teaching.

Key Next Steps

ERO and managers agree that key next steps are to strengthen:

  • the quality of the learning environment and activities provided for children’s learning
  • strategies for supporting children’s age-related learning needs
  • professional leadership and teacher appraisal processes.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of BJ's Childcare (Ltd) completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)
  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)
  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)
  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of BJ's Childcare (Ltd) will be in three years.

Dale Bailey

National Manager Review Services

Northern Region

8 October 2014

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Whau Valley, Whangarei

Ministry of Education profile number

46096

Licence type

Education & Care Service

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 0 aged under 2

Service roll

22

Gender composition

Girls 15

Boys 7

Ethnic composition

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Tuvalu

other

9

9

2

2

Percentage of qualified teachers

0-49% 50-79% 80%

Based on funding rates

80%

Reported ratios of staff to children

Under 2

NA

 
 

Over 2

1:10

Meets minimum requirements

Review team on site

July 2014

Date of this report

8 October 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

No previous ERO reports

 

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

  • Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children
  • Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children
  • Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children
  • Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.