Totara Park Playcentre

Education institution number:
60025
Service type:
Playcentre
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
43
Telephone:
Address:

128 California Drive, Upper Hutt CBD, Upper Hutt

View on map

Totara Park Playcentre - 21/02/2020

1 Evaluation of Totara Park Playcentre

How well placed is Totara Park Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Totara Park Playcentre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children.

Background

Totara Park Playcentre is one of 17 playcentres in the Hutt Valley region. The service operates for five sessions each week and is licensed for 30 children, including up to 15 aged under two years. Families enrolled represent a number of diverse cultures. Ten of the children identified as Māori.

At the time of its May 2016 ERO review, the centre was one of 17 administered by the Lower Hutt Playcentre Association, under the umbrella of The New Zealand Playcentre Federation Inc. In June 2019, the 32 associations nationwide amalgamated into one new entity, a charitable trust called Playcentre Aotearoa. Hutt Valley playcentres are now managed as part of a regional hub (the organisation) within the new entity.

A centre support worker (CSW), employed by the organisation, regularly visits the playcentre and provides professional advice and feedback to strengthen the programme for children. A centre administrator (CA) works with parents and caregivers (members) to support compliance with regulations. Day-to-day management is the role of centre-elected office holders. At the time of this review, many families were new to the service. A session supervisor, with recognised levels of training, provides ongoing support for the implementation of the daily programme.

Playcentre philosophy recognises the importance of parents working together, alongside their children, to support their self-initiated play and promote their learning.

The previous ERO report identified areas for improvement. These included appraisal and culturally responsive strategies to support Māori children. Appropriate appraisal systems are now in place. Though responsiveness to Māori remains a next step for the service, some progress is evident.

This review was one of eight in Playcentre Aotearoa, Hutt Valley region.

The Review Findings

Child-led learning is very well supported in a calm, engaging learning environment. Older and younger children are empowered to make choices and work together. Adults play responsively alongside children and use deliberate strategies to challenge them and extend their thinking, oral language and friendships. Families demonstrate a strong sense of belonging. Members take collective responsibility for the learning and wellbeing of all children and know them well. The playcentre's community-focused philosophy is clearly evident in practice.

Improving the bicultural curriculum has been a centre priority. Positive changes to practices, the environment and resources are providing increased opportunities for all children to engage with te reo me ngā tikanga Māori. Members should now focus on monitoring children's learning outcomes in this area, including through assessment documentation. In addition, the organisation should continue to support members to understand and enact specific, culturally responsive strategies for Māori children.

Members know children well, and document how they provide engaging experiences that support their interests. Assessment, planning and evaluation should be strengthened, to focus on extending children’s learning characteristics, rather than their activities. Exploring the goals of Te Whāriki, the early learning curriculum, and considering how these could guide planning for ‘where to next’ for children, would be a useful first step.

Collaborative internal evaluation processes are becoming embedded in centre practice, with organisation support and guidance. ERO and leaders agree that this is an area for ongoing development. The process would benefit from an increased focus on measurable success indicators, based on positive learning outcomes for children. This would better support members to know the impact of their practices.

Centre members are focused on quality provision for children and work well as a team. Long-serving members model playcentre philosophy and expectations and offer valuable support to newer members. A strong sense of collective ownership of the centre fosters regular improvements, for the benefit of children.

The CSWs work collaboratively to support centre members in their roles. Relational trust is prioritised. They offer useful guidance, support and encouragement to foster members’ understanding and engagement. At times, written feedback does not include sufficient detail about next steps to strengthen centre practices. The organisation should establish consistent reporting expectations, with a particular focus on promoting the next steps outlined in this ERO report and monitoring necessary improvements.

Across the organisation, children and their families would benefit from increased clarity around identifying and supporting children with diverse learning needs, including speech and language. This should involve proactive, timely information-sharing and guidance for all playcentres.

The restructure of playcentre operation is being carefully worked through to support a new and more sustainable future for the organisation. The regional office provides a range of support for centres. Regional leaders agree that key next steps are to embed the recently reviewed policy framework and appraisal systems.

Key Next Steps

Organisation leaders should prioritise support for Totara Park Playcentre members in the following areas:

  • continuing to grow culturally responsive practices, particularly for Māori children

  • focusing assessment, planning and evaluation on deliberately extending children’s learning

  • using measurable, child-focused success indicators in internal evaluation

  • embedding new policies and procedures, including appraisal, in centre practice.

In addition, the organisation should:

  • establish clear and consistent practices for providing challenging feedback to centres, focusing on priority improvement areas

  • ensure that centres receive clear, useful and timely guidance around identification and support strategies for children with diverse learning needs.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Totara Park Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum
  • premises and facilities
  • health and safety practices
  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Guiding policies and procedures have been recently revised at national level by Playcentre Aotearoa, to reflect current legislation. To improve practice, members should build their understanding of these new documents and ensure they consistently guide centre practice.

ERO identified areas of non-compliance related to health and safety. To meet requirements, the service should ensure that:

  • all equipment that could fall or topple and cause serious injury or damage are secured
  • the written emergency plan is reviewed on at least an annual basis.

Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education Services 2008, HS6, HS7

Since the onsite phase of this review, the playcentre has taken steps to address these.

Dr Lesley Patterson
Director Review and Improvement Services 
Southern Region - Te Tai Tini

21 February 2020

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Upper Hutt

Ministry of Education profile number

60025

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

53

Gender composition

Male 28, Female 25

Ethnic composition

Māori
NZ European/Pākehā
Other ethnic groups

10
37
6

Reported ratios of adults to children

Under 2

1:2

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:5

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

November 2019

Date of this report

21 February 2020

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

May 2016

Education Review

June 2013

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement

The overall judgement that ERO makes will depend on how well the service promotes positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed

  • Well placed

  • Requires further development

  • Not well placed

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.

Totara Park Playcentre - 09/05/2016

1 Evaluation of Totara Park Playcentre

How well placed is Totara Park Playcentre to promote positive learning outcomes for children?

Not well placed

Requires further development

Well placed

Very well placed

Totara Park Playcentre is well placed to promote positive learning outcomes for children. 

ERO's findings that support this overall judgement are summarised below.

Background

Totara Park Playcentre is one of 17 centres administered by the Lower Hutt Playcentre Association (the association). The association is made up of elected volunteer representatives from its member centres. It provides the parent committee at Totara Park with governance and management support. A kaitautoko, a centre support person, is employed by the association to provide guidance.

The centre is licensed to provide mixed-age sessional education and care for 30 children four days a week. This includes 15 children up to the age of two. There is one afternoon session for older children.

Curriculum planning and implementation is a shared responsibility. Each session is supported by a team of parent educators who hold playcentre training certificates. When necessary they employ a supervisor with the level of training that meets the legislative requirements for group supervision.

Almost all centre members are involved in the adult education training programme provided by the association. The centre has sustained the good numbers of parents taking advantage of this opportunity for active involvement in their child's education.

The securing of a silver Healthy Heart Award has added emphasis to implementing a programme that supports children making healthy active choices and consuming appropriate food for healthy development.

The service and the association has a positive reporting history with ERO. Effective centre practice identified in the June 2013 ERO report has been sustained.

This review was part of a cluster of eight services within the Hutt Playcentre Association.

The Review Findings

Children's active exploration through play and their learning is well supported by attentive parent educators. Respectful relationships between all positively contributes to children's strong sense of belonging.

The service's philosophy strongly reflects the playcentre philosophy of parent-led education, learning through play and the principles and strands of Te Whāriki, the early childhood curriculum. A culture of care, respect and shared responsibility for leading children's play is evident.

Children participate enthusiastically in a varied range of planned and spontaneous activities. They are able to lead their own learning and benefit from the wide range of skills and interests of adults. These positive aspects of practice are celebrated in assessment, planning and evaluation records.

Centre members continually seek ways to improve their practice. They share information in many ways, including a closed portal of social media.

The inclusion of te ao Māori and acknowledgement of children's cultures, languages and identities continues to evolve. Children who identify as Māori are empowered to be confident in their own culture. Adults are committed to learn about promoting educational success for Māori children.

Adults skilfully manage interactions to maximise children's learning and growing independence. Children aged up to two years old experience freedom to make choices about their play. A positive social and emotional climate results from a responsive curriculum. The recently redeveloped outside playground is the outcome of deliberate planning to challenge and support all children's physical development.

The association is an improvement focused organisation committed to providing timely and relevant support for its centre members. ERO's June 2013 reviews found the support provided at the centre level by kaitautoko was appreciated and supportive. ERO also recognised that formalising this arrangement to promote a more effective approach to responding to the needs of individual centres was a next step for development. An evaluation of the effectiveness of changes to kaitautoko practice in improving outcomes for centre members and children is planned for.

The previous ERO report identified that members should strengthen the approach to assessment, planning and evaluation. It reported a need to further develop understanding and use of self review. These aspects of practice have been addressed.

Key Next Steps

The association:

  • must implement rigorous annual appraisal for the kaitautoko and identify professional development to support them in their leadership roles

should build kaitautoko knowledge and capability to undertake effective internal evaluation. This should include a focus on providing centre members with evaluative feedback that assists them to further develop aspects of the curriculum and centre practice.

Centre members have identified the need to continue to explore ways to support educational success for Māori children at the playcentre.

Management Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the staff and management of Totara Park Playcentre completed an ERO Centre Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklist. In these documents they attested that they have taken all reasonable steps to meet their legal obligations related to:

  • curriculum

  • premises and facilities

  • health and safety practices

  • governance, management and administration.

During the review, ERO looked at the service’s systems for managing the following areas that have a potentially high impact on children's wellbeing:

  • emotional safety (including positive guidance and child protection)

  • physical safety (including supervision; sleep procedures; accidents; medication; hygiene; excursion policies and procedures)

  • suitable staffing (including qualification levels; police vetting; teacher registration; ratios)

  • evacuation procedures and practices for fire and earthquake.

All early childhood services are required to promote children's health and safety and to regularly review their compliance with legal requirements.

Action for compliance

ERO identified areas of non-compliance relating to governance and management practices. To meet requirements the service needs to improve its performance in the following area:

  • fully implementing a system of regular appraisal.[Licensing Criteria for Early Childhood Education and Care Centres 2008, GMA7]

Next ERO Review

When is ERO likely to review the service again?

The next ERO review of Totara Park Playcentre will be in three years.

Joyce Gebbie

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central

9 May 2016

The Purpose of ERO Reports

The Education Review Office (ERO) is the government department that, as part of its work, reviews early childhood services throughout Aotearoa New Zealand. ERO’s reports provide information for parents and communities about each service’s strengths and next steps for development. ERO’s bicultural evaluation framework Ngā Pou Here is described in SECTION 3 of this report. Early childhood services are partners in the review process and are expected to make use of the review findings to enhance children's wellbeing and learning.

2 Information about the Early Childhood Service

Location

Upper Hutt

Ministry of Education profile number

60025

Licence type

Playcentre

Licensed under

Education (Early Childhood Services) Regulations 2008

Number licensed for

30 children, including up to 15 aged under 2

Service roll

36

Gender composition

Girls 20, Boys 16

Ethnic composition

Māori

Pākehā

4

32

Reported ratios of adults to children

Under 2

1:1

Better than minimum requirements

Over 2

1:2

Better than minimum requirements

Review team on site

March 2016

Date of this report

9 May 2016

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

June 2013

Education Review

August 2009

Education Review

June 2006

3 General Information about Early Childhood Reviews

ERO’s Evaluation Framework

ERO’s overarching question for an early childhood education review is ‘How well placed is this service to promote positive learning outcomes for children?’ ERO focuses on the following factors as described in the bicultural framework Ngā Pou Here:

Pou Whakahaere – how the service determines its vision, philosophy and direction to ensure positive outcomes for children

Pou Ārahi – how leadership is enacted to enhance positive outcomes for children

Mātauranga – whose knowledge is valued and how the curriculum is designed to achieve positive outcomes for children

Tikanga whakaako – how approaches to teaching and learning respond to diversity and support positive outcomes for children.

Within these areas ERO considers the effectiveness of arotake – self review and of whanaungatanga – partnerships with parents and whānau.

ERO evaluates how well placed a service is to sustain good practice and make ongoing improvements for the benefit of all children at the service.

A focus for the government is that all children, especially priority learners, have an opportunity to benefit from quality early childhood education. ERO will report on how well each service promotes positive outcomes for all children, with a focus on children who are Māori, Pacific, have diverse needs, and are up to the age of two.

For more information about the framework and Ngā Pou Here refer to ERO’s Approach to Review in Early Childhood Services.

ERO’s Overall Judgement and Next Review

The overall judgement that ERO makes and the timing of the next review will depend on how well placed a service is to promote positive learning outcomes for children. The categories are:

  • Very well placed – The next ERO review in four years
  • Well placed – The next ERO review in three years
  • Requires further development – The next ERO review within two years
  • Not well placed - The next ERO review in consultation with the Ministry of Education

ERO has developed criteria for each category. These are available on ERO’s website.

Review Coverage

ERO reviews are tailored to each service’s context and performance, within the overarching review framework. The aim is to provide information on aspects that are central to positive outcomes for children and useful to the service.