Glenavy School

Education institution number:
3348
School type:
Full Primary
School gender:
Co-Educational
Definition:
Not Applicable
Total roll:
135
Telephone:
Address:

19 Ruane Street, Glenavy, Waimate

View on map

Glenavy School

 Te Ara Huarau | School Profile Report

Background

This Profile Report was written within six months of the Education Review Office and Glenavy School working in Te Ara Huarau, an improvement evaluation approach used in most English Medium State and State Integrated Schools. For more information about Te Ara Huarau see ERO’s website www.ero.govt.nz

Context 

Glenavy School provides education for students from Years 1 to 8 in a rural area in South Canterbury. The recent rapid roll growth is linked to the local farming industry. This includes a high number of students with English as a second language and a significant number of students moving in and out of the area from year to year. The current school vision is to educate and equip rural students with skills and values to confidently build their own ‘bridge of success’ from the present to their future.

Glenavy School’s strategic priorities for improving outcomes for learners are to:

  • ensure a consistent language of learning and an assessment tool are used across the school

  • further develop and enhance strong and positive learning relationships with the community

  • improve transitions for students into, through and beyond the school

  • strengthen teachers’ knowledge of how best to equip all students to succeed in their learning in New Zealand.

You can find a copy of the school’s strategic and annual plan on Glenavy School’s website.

ERO and the school are working together to evaluate how well a structured literacy approach is supporting positive outcomes for English Language Learners over time.

The rationale for selecting this evaluation is:

  • there are many learners arriving at school with little to no English language

  • the school needs to be sure that the approach is having the desired effect on English Language Learners in particular

  • the school needs to know the specific aspects of the approach that are most effective in supporting these learners.

The school expects to see all students:

  • improving their communication skills with an increasing understanding of the English language

  • meeting or exceeding the school’s expectations in literacy achievement and progress

  • having sufficient literacy skills to successfully support learning in the wider curriculum.

Strengths

The school can draw from the following strengths to support it in its goal to evaluate how well the structured literacy approach is supporting positive outcomes for English Language Learners over time.

  • Warm, caring relationships between all members of the school community support students in their learning.

  • Teachers and teacher aides have strong cultural knowledge and practices in teaching English Language Learners so that students experience success in their learning journey.

  • There are useful systems in place for tracking and monitoring students’ progress and achievement.

  • Assessment information is used well to inform teaching and learning practices so that students are learning at their point of challenge.

  • The principal’s and teachers’ evaluation skills which enable the best practices to be used to support all learners to succeed.

Where to next?

Moving forward, the school will prioritise:

  • staff engaging in ongoing professional learning and development in teaching English Language Learners

  • ongoing professional learning and development for teachers and teacher aides in delivering the ‘Structured Literacy’ programme

  • supporting parents to understand and reinforce their child’s learning at home

  • continued implementation of robust assessment and evaluation of the impact of ‘Structured Literacy’ on English Language Learners

  • continued professional learning and development in the use of a learning progressions assessment tool.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. ERO will support the school in reporting their progress to the community. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

4 July 2023 

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.  educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Glenavy School

Board Assurance with Regulatory and Legislative Requirements Report 2023 to 2026

As of February 2023, the Glenavy School Board has attested to the following regulatory and legislative requirements:

Board Administration

Yes

Curriculum

Yes

Management of Health, Safety and Welfare

Yes

Personnel Management

Yes

Finance

Yes

Assets

Yes

Further Information

For further information please contact Glenavy School Board.

The next School Board assurance that it is meeting regulatory and legislative requirements will be reported, along with the Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report, within three years.

Information on ERO’s role and process in this review can be found on the Education Review Office website.

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

4 July 2023 

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

Glenavy School - 05/06/2020

School Context

Glenavy School is a small rural Years 1 to 8 primary school in South Canterbury. It has a roll of 87 students from culturally diverse backgrounds. This includes an increasing number of English language learners, particularly from the Tongan and Filipino communities.

The school’s fluctuating roll is impacted on significantly by the local dairying industry. However, since ERO’s 2017 review, the school has experienced consistent roll growth.

The vision of the school is represented as the ‘Bridge of Success’ and underpinned by the strategic pillars ‘Rural, Pride, Achievement and Future’. To achieve its valued outcomes, the school aims to support its students to adapt and contribute to the global community and to develop self-respect, integrity and skills for self-management.

Leaders and teachers regularly report to the board, schoolwide information about outcomes for students in the following areas:

  • achievement in reading, writing and mathematics
  • progress and achievement in relation to identified school targets
  • outcomes related to wellbeing for student success.

Some trustees have joined the board since the school’s January 2017 ERO review. Teaching staff has remained the same for a number of years. The school is an active participant in the Whitestone Kāhui Ako | Community of Learning.

Evaluation Findings

1 Equity and excellence – achievement of valued outcomes for students

1.1 How well is the school achieving equitable and excellent outcomes for all its students?

At the end of 2019, the majority of students achieved at national curriculum expectations in writing and mathematics. Most achieved at expected curriculum levels in reading. Given the movement of students in and out of the school it is not meaningful to comment on achievement trends over time.

Māori students achieved very well in relation to their peers at the school, with most at expectations for reading and writing. The majority of Filipino and Pacific students achieved at expectations in reading, writing and mathematics.

School achievement data showed a gender disparity in reading and writing for boys in 2019. However, this disparity has reduced over time.

Students with additional learning needs make very good progress in relation to their learning goals.

Students achieved well in relation to the school’s broader valued outcomes. Reports to the board showed students:

  • have a strong sense of pride in their school and local community
  • have respect for others and themselves
  • have positive relationships with adults
  • feel safe and know the school values.

1.2 How well is the school accelerating learning for those students who need this?

The school is successful in accelerating the progress of the majority of students who need this.

A significant number of boys have made accelerated progress in reading and writing. As a result, there is a reduced disparity for boys in literacy.

School achievement information indicates that most students who have English as an additional language make accelerated progress in literacy and mathematics over time.

2 School conditions for equity and excellence – processes and practices

2.1 What school processes and practices are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

Students benefit from a broad, rich curriculum that is inclusive, authentic and relevant to their diverse cultures. A strong emphasis is placed on integrating literacy and mathematics and building students’ oral language. Students access a diverse range of learning opportunities that support their engagement and wellbeing, including the development of leadership skills.

Leaders and teachers use effective strategies to engage and accelerate the learning of students who need additional support. This includes detailed assessment and monitoring of their progress and specific planning of next learning steps. School staff are highly responsive to students with special learning needs, ensuring individual goals are achieved. The school has deliberate practices and interventions to assist students whose learning has been disrupted, such as transient students.

As a result, students develop a strong sense of belonging to their school and show improved levels of achievement and engagement.

School leaders have established a collaborative school culture and implemented useful schoolwide systems and processes. They ensure that teachers’ professional learning and inquiry align well to the school’s vision and strategic priorities, including deepening professional practice in order to better support students. A useful appraisal system and clear teaching and learning expectations contribute to effective teaching practices.

Trustees represent and serve the school and its community well in their stewardship role. They scrutinise learning information regularly to inform resourcing decisions that contribute positively to equitable outcomes for all students.

2.2 What further developments are needed in school processes and practices for achievement of equity and excellence, and acceleration of learning?

The school and ERO have identified the need to refine and extend leaders’ and teachers’ analysis and use of assessment and achievement data. This will provide a more accurate picture of rates of acceleration and sufficiency of progress for students at risk of not achieving.

Aspects of internal evaluation could be further strengthened. Presently, useful processes are in place for gathering and making sense of teaching and learning, wellbeing and other information. Some of the outcomes of this information could be better used to inform future planning. This includes the subsequent evaluation of the impact of changes made.

3 Board Assurance on Legal Requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • finance
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration and certification
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students
  • attendance
  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Children’s Act 2014.

4 ERO’s Overall Judgement

On the basis of the findings of this review, ERO’s overall evaluation judgement of Glenavy School’s performance in achieving valued outcomes for its students is: Well placed.

ERO’s Framework: Overall Findings and Judgement Tool derived from School Evaluation Indicators: Effective Practice for Improvement and Learner Success is available on ERO’s website.

5 Going forward

Key strengths of the school

For sustained improvement and future learner success, the school can draw on existing strengths in:

  • school systems, processes and practices that are focused on achieving equity and excellence, and accelerating students’ progress
  • an inclusive and responsive localised school curriculum that effectively uses students’ interests, teachers’ skills and knowledge, the environment and wider community to make learning engaging and relevant
  • the principal’s collaborative approach that establishes and models high expectations
  • a caring and inclusive learning environment that promotes equity and excellence.

Next steps

For sustained improvement and future learner success, priorities for further development are to continue to:

  • strengthen aspects of internal evaluation to better inform school development
  • strengthen analysis of achievement information to better know about the rates and sufficiency of progress students make.

Dr Lesley Patterson

Director Review and Improvement Services (Southern)

Southern Region - Te Tai Tini

5 June 2020

About the school

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.