St Michael's School (Taita)

St Michael's School (Taita)

Te Ara Huarau | School Profile Report

Background

This Profile Report was written within two years of the Education Review Office and St Michael’s School (Taita) working in Te Ara Huarau, an improvement evaluation approach used in most English Medium State and State Integrated Schools. For more information about Te Ara Huarau see ERO’s website www.ero.govt.nz

Context 

St. Michael’s School is an integrated catholic character school situated in Taita, Lower Hutt providing educational opportunities to students in Years 0 to 8.

St Michael’s School (Taita)’s strategic priorities to improve outcomes for learners are:

  • to maintain a school culture that is inclusive, physically and emotionally safe and intentionally welcoming to all

  • for all students to progress and achieve in relation to their expected levels within the New Zealand Curriculum

  • to enhance teaching practices so that student engagement, progress and success improved for all students.

You can find a copy of the school’s charter, strategic and annual plans on St Michael’s School (Taita)’s website.

ERO and the school are working together to identify and evaluate the impact of strategies that impact positively of the engagement and achievement of students with Pacific heritage. It is looking to further integrate these into the delivery of the school’s local curriculum.

The rationale for selecting this evaluation is a desire to:

  • raise the achievement and mana of Pacific students – over 90% identify as being of Pacific heritage and for many English is a second language

  • identify the teaching strategies that have resulted in a positive shift in student achievement recently

  • evaluate the impact of recent teacher professional development targeted at raising the achievement of students with Pacific heritage.

The school expects to see students are actively engaged in their learning, achieving educational success and who demonstrate pride in their unique identity, language and culture. It also expects to see increased integration of effective teaching strategies into classrooms and throughout the school by staff. 

Strengths

The school can draw from the following strengths to support the school in its goal to effectively integrate effective teaching practices into the delivery of its local curriculum:

  • provision of a caring and culturally appropriate environment where the culture of all students is valued and celebrated, especially that of Pacific students

  • a local curriculum that is strongly aligned to the culture and wellbeing of students

  • leadership that brings out the strengths and builds on the potential of all

  • strong teacher/student relationships that are well established and support student wellbeing.

Where to next?

Moving forward, the school will prioritise:

  • provision of support to staff to identify teaching strategies that have most impact on Pacific students

  • development of a shared understanding of these effective practices among staff

  • the implementation of key strategies into teaching and learning programmes throughout St Michael’s School to raise attendance and achievement levels.

ERO’s role will be to support the school in its evaluation for improvement cycle to improve outcomes for all learners. ERO will support the school in reporting their progress to the community. The next public report on ERO’s website will be a Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report and is due within three years.

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

7 June 2023

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement.  educationcounts.govt.nz/home

St Michael's School (Taita)

Board Assurance with Regulatory and Legislative Requirements Report 2022 to 2025

As of May 2022, the St Michael’s School (Taita) Board of Trustees has attested to the following regulatory and legislative requirements:

Board Administration

Yes

Curriculum

Yes

Management of Health, Safety and Welfare

Yes

Personnel Management

Yes

Finance

Yes

Assets

Yes

Further Information

For further information please contact St Michael’s School (Taita) Board of Trustees.

The next Board of Trustees assurance that it is meeting regulatory and legislative requirements will be reported, along with the Te Ara Huarau | School Evaluation Report, within three years.

Information on ERO’s role and process in this review can be found on the Education Review Office website.

Shelley Booysen
Director of Schools

7 June 2023

About the School

The Education Counts website provides further information about the school’s student population, student engagement and student achievement. educationcounts.govt.nz/home

St Michael's School (Taita) - 27/04/2017

Summary

At the time of this external evaluation 118 students were enrolled at St Michael’s School. Eight identify as Māori and 101 as Pacific. Most students enter with low early literacy and numeracy knowledge. Approximately a third of the roll is English Language Learners (ELLs).

Since the 2014 ERO evaluation, new trustees have been elected and a new principal started in term 4, 2016. The co-assistant principals/directors of religious studies acted in the principal’s role in term 3, 2016. Staff members are long serving and know the students and their families well.

The school’s National Standards data over the last few years shows fluctuations in progress as children move through year levels, with disparity between boys and girls. Annual targets have been set to accelerate boys’ achievement, with some positive outcomes.

Teachers have undertaken professional learning and development related to: literacy and numeracy with a focus on the achievement of boys; Pacific cultures; positive behaviour for learning; ELLs; and the use of information technologies.

How well is the school achieving equitable outcomes for all children?

Most students make good progress, with examples of accelerated progress for some over time. Teachers clearly identify and plan targeted programmes for those below National Standards. Early intervention is promoted with very good provision for students requiring additional learning support, including ELLs, and those with high needs.

At the time of this ERO review, 74% of the students were at or above National Standards for reading, 70% for mathematics and 64% for writing. School leaders are aware of the need to strengthen moderation to ensure greater reliability of National Standard information.

Trustees plan to gain better knowledge about their role and responsibilities. The school’s curriculum requires reviewing and further developing to ensure it meets the diverse needs of learners.

The school agrees to:

  • develop more targeted planning to accelerate learning for all children

  • monitor targeted planning, improved teaching, and children’s progress

  • discuss the progress with ERO. 

ERO will provide an internal evaluation workshop in response to a request by the school.

Gaining shared understandings about, and making better use of, internal evaluation will help the board and leaders gain knowledge about school effectiveness to achieve equitable outcomes for students.

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Equity and excellence

How effectively does this school respond to Māori and other children whose learning and achievement need acceleration?

The school is increasing its effectiveness to respond to students whose learning and achievement needs acceleration. Approximately three quarters were at and above the National Standards for reading at the end of 2016, with around two thirds for writing and mathematics. The focus on raising achievement for boys in reading and numeracy resulted in further improvement for them last year.

School leaders want to strengthen moderation practices, within and outside the school, to ensure greater reliability of the National Standards data. Students are regularly assessed using an appropriate range of national tools, however, their use is not yet maximised. Data from a range of assessments informs teaching and learning, reporting to families and to the board.

Very good provision is made for students requiring additional learning support, including ELLs. Their needs are identified early, targeted plans are prepared for each child and interventions put in place. Progress is thoroughly monitored to inform teaching, share with children, families and the board. Further consideration needs to be given to ensuring written reports to families are in plain language.

School tone is positive. This is supported by the special Catholic Character, Christian principles and the strong focus on respect for oneself, others and the environment.

School conditions supporting equity and excellence

What school processes are effective in enabling achievement of equity and excellence?

Key emphasis is given to strengthening the quality of teaching to better respond to the diverse needs of learners. Teachers support each other in syndicate groups and work well as a team. Classrooms are welcoming, settled environments. Students are beginning to take greater responsibility for their learning.

The school’s curriculum appropriately prioritises numeracy and literacy, including oral language. Effective leadership, clear school-wide expectations and support for teachers is provided in these areas. The school continues to develop inquiry-based learning that is integrated across all curriculum areas, including religious education. The curriculum includes a Pacific focus based on students’ needs and interests.

Families are welcomed, involved in school activities and valued as partners in learning. A high level of parent participation in sporting activities and cultural performances is apparent. The school has found that when family members are actively involved in their child’s learning there is a greater likelihood of accelerated progress. Teachers and teacher aides who speak Pacific languages often interpret for families.

Teachers regularly reflect on their practice. They are using inquiry and regularly engage in planned conversations to promote continuous improvement to enhance outcomes for students.

The board is becoming increasingly aware of the expectations for good stewardship. Trustees are presently considering their training needs and have begun to review school policies and procedures.

Sustainable development for equity and excellence

What further developments are needed in school processes to achieve equity and excellence?

The board and school leadership are positive about further developments to improve stewardship, curriculum leadership and internal evaluation practices to achieve equity and excellence. They acknowledge that:

  • trustees are beginning to gain a shared understanding of their role and responsibilities. They are presently undertaking a needs analysis to inform decisions about training requirements

  • with the appointment of a new principal, school leaders are aware of the need to:

    • develop shared understandings about leadership for equity and excellence
    • review the school’s curriculum, with input from the school community, to ensure it is culturally responsive and clearly linked to the principles of the New Zealand Curriculum
    • develop clear expectations for moderation to ensure greater reliability of judgements made about National Standards
    • ensure teaching programmes enable the best possible opportunities for students to achieve at and above National Standards over their eight years of primary schooling
    • ensure that appraisal is robust with processes in place for collecting appropriate evidence about teachers’ practice
    • continue to find different ways to encourage and support more family members to actively engage with teachers to help improve and accelerate children’s learning 
    • trustees, leaders and teachers are working towards gaining a shared understanding of effective internal evaluation for evidence-based decision making. They are unsure about the quality and effectiveness of some programmes and other aspects of school operation.

The above developments should aim to ensure: clear alignment between the board’s strategic goals; annual plans and targets to accelerate the progress of students below National Standards; appraisal for school leaders and teachers; and teaching and learning to achieve equity and excellence.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board and principal of the school completed the ERO board assurance statement and self-audit checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to the following:

  • board administration

  • curriculum

  • management of health, safety and welfare

  • personnel management

  • asset management. 

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student safety and wellbeing:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)

  • physical safety of students

  • teacher registration and certification

  • processes for appointing staff

  • stand down, suspension, expulsion and exclusion of students

  • attendance

  • school policies in relation to meeting the requirements of the Vulnerable Children Act 2014.

Going forward

How well placed is the school to accelerate the achievement of all children who need it?

The school has capacity and capability to accelerate learning for all children. However, disparity in achievement remains.

Leaders and teachers:

  • know the children whose learning and achievement need to be accelerated

  • need to improve the school conditions that support the acceleration of children’s learning and achievement

  • need to build teacher capability to accelerate children’s learning and achievement.

The school agrees to:

  • develop more targeted planning to accelerate learning for children

  • monitor targeted planning, improved teaching, and children’s progress

  • discuss the school’s progress with ERO.

ERO will provide an internal evaluation workshop in response to a request by the school. 

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Patricia Davey

Deputy Chief Review Officer Central (Acting)

27 April 2017

About the school

Location

Lower Hutt

Ministry of Education profile number

3015

School type

Full Primary

School roll

118

Gender composition

Boys, 52% Girls, 48%

Ethnic composition

Māori 7%

Pacific 86%

Other ethnic groups 7%

Provision of Māori medium education

No

Review team on site

February 2017

Date of this report

27 April 2017

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review January 2014

Education Review December 2010

Supplementary Review October 2008

St Michael's School (Taita) - 14/01/2014

1 Context

What are the important features of this school that have an impact on student learning?

St Michael’s School is a state integrated, Years 1 to 8 primary school situated in the suburb of Taita in the Hutt Valley. It is a valued part of its local parish. The Catholic character continues to be an important part of daily classroom routines promoting Christian values and teachings. Classroom environments and interactions reflect the school's special character.

The majority of students are from Pacific families and some have English as their second language. Māori students comprise 10% of the school's roll. Staffing has remained stable. The family atmosphere and a focus on physical health and wellbeing contribute to a settled learning environment.

The school has a study support centre and hosts an after school violin programme for students.

2 Learning

How well does this school use achievement information to make positive changes to learners’ engagement, progress and achievement?

School leaders and teachers use student achievement information well to promote positive outcomes for students.

School leaders gather a wide range of purposeful and useful information about student progress and achievement. Students’ progress is closely monitored. Data reported to the board shows that around 60% of students are achieving at and above in relation to the National Standards in reading, writing and mathematics.

Those students who are not achieving well are identified. Appropriate support programmes and adapted teaching strategies are aimed at improving outcomes for these students. Progress is monitored. In mid-2013, information shows that more priority learners are achieving at or above National Standards than at the end of 2012.

Most students are engaged in learning. They are confident to contribute their ideas and opinions. Learning conversations and affirming relationships between staff and students are evident.

Parents are well informed. Reports to parents provide clear, comprehensive information about their child’s progress and achievement in relation to the National Standards in reading, writing and mathematics. Students share and discuss portfolios of work with their parents during parent interviews.

Students' transition into school is well supported by good partnerships with parents. Information sharing with local schools helps to prepare students for secondary school.

3 Curriculum

How effectively does this school’s curriculum promote and support student learning?

This school's curriculum is generally effective in promoting and supporting learning.

The curriculum is closely linked to the principles and key competencies of The New Zealand Curriculum. It meaningfully reflects the school’s community and its Christian values. It provides clear expectations for effective teaching. The principal acknowledges that it is timely to review the curriculum to ensure that it meets the needs of the increasingly diverse community.

Teachers know the students and their families well. They have high expectations for learning. They use effective strategies to engage students. Cooperative learning is a strong feature of the school. Learning environments that celebrate students’ diverse cultures, particularly of Pacific students, is a next step.

Students work well together and support each other. Teachers use questioning well to extend and challenge students. They share the purpose of learning with them. Students are able to talk about the learning task. Senior leaders are aware they need to further develop students’ ownership of learning and have identified this as a next step.

Teachers engage in regular professional learning and development. They work collaboratively and inquire into the effectiveness of their teaching practice. Teachers are strengthening this inquiry process. Appraisal supports the professional growth and development of teachers effectively.

How effectively does the school promote educational success for Māori, as Māori?

A small number of students identify as Māori. School leaders are aware of the need to continue to develop ways to promote educational success for Māori as Māori. They are focused on improving Māori student achievement and have identified those students needing additional support. Midyear data presented to the board show that most of these students are achieving well.

4 Sustainable Performance

How well placed is the school to sustain and improve its performance?

The school is well placed to sustain and improve its performance. The principal provides strong professional leadership and works actively to build the capacity of staff. Very good systems and processes are in place to support teaching and learning.

Trustees are new to their role. They are developing their understanding of governance. They are very well informed about student progress, achievement and school developments. A governance manual supports them with their understanding of the governance role.

The board, senior leaders and teachers involve parents in their child’s learning. Supporting parents and finding ways to involve them in school life is a strength.

A clear cycle of self review assists trustees, leaders and teachers to maintain the focus on improvement.

Board assurance on legal requirements

Before the review, the board of trustees and principal of the school completed the ERO Board Assurance Statement and Self-Audit Checklists. In these documents they attested that they had taken all reasonable steps to meet their legislative obligations related to:

  • board administration
  • curriculum
  • management of health, safety and welfare
  • personnel management
  • financial management
  • asset management.

During the review, ERO checked the following items because they have a potentially high impact on student achievement:

  • emotional safety of students (including prevention of bullying and sexual harassment)
  • physical safety of students
  • teacher registration
  • processes for appointing staff
  • stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions
  • attendance.

When is ERO likely to review the school again?

ERO is likely to carry out the next review in three years.

Joyce Gebbie National Manager Review Services Central Region (Acting)

14 January 2014Image removed.

About the School

Location

Taita

Ministry of Education profile number

3015

School type

Full Primary (Years 1 to 8)

School roll

114

Gender composition

Female 52%, Male 48%

Ethnic composition

Pacific

Māori

NZ European/Pākehā

Other ethnic groups

72%

10%

4%

14%

Review team on site

October 2013

Date of this report

14 January 2014

Most recent ERO report(s)

Education Review

Supplementary Review

Education Review

December 2010

October 2008

October 2007