GMA304 Operational review

Licensing criterion and guidance for GMA304 Operational review.

On this page

Criterion GMA304

There is an ongoing review process that supports the service to maintain and implement operational policies and practices. 

The process supports improvements where changes are needed.  

Documentation required (written or digital):

  • A process for reviewing the service’s delivery of operational policies and practices;

  • the process is consistent with criterion GMA303; and

  • recorded outcomes from the review process.

Guidance

How to show you are complying

Operational policies and practices are the documented and day-to-day procedures that guide how your service runs. To comply with criterion, you must have an  ongoing process of review of these operational policies and practices. 

This review process should be structured to make sure your service’s policies and practices are:

  • up to date

  • relevant

  • implemented

  • aligned with regulatory standards

This usually includes scheduled reviews at set times (like once a year) and extra reviews when something changes—such as new legislation, updated information such as government bulletins, incidents or complaints, or feedback from staff or service users suggests a need for change.

Use insights from your reviews and feedback to refine policies and practices over time.

A documented operational review process 

You will need a document that explains how your service reviews its operational policies and practices. 

As an example, this could include: 

  • scope – what areas or policies are covered

  • frequency – how often reviews happen

  • triggers – what types of incidents or complaints prompt an unscheduled review

  • roles – who is responsible for leading and contributing to the review

  • how families are invited to take part in the review

  • methods – how reviews are carried out (for example surveys, meetings)

  • tracking changes – how updates are recorded (for example version control, review dates)

  • implementation – how changes are shared with staff and put into practice

  • the recorded outcomes of the review – keep clear, up-to-date records of policy reviews, including who was involved, what changes were made and why, and regularly check if those changes are having the intended impact.

Stakeholder involvement

To demonstrate the process is consistent with criterion GMA302, you will need to include input from:

  • adults providing education and care who use the policies and implement practices and

  • parents and whānau of children using your service.

Documentation (written or digital)

Keep records of reviews, including what feedback informed changes, what changes (or decisions not to change) were made and the reasons behind them. 

Written or digital in this context refers to any recorded information—whether on paper or in electronic format—that captures decisions, actions, reflections, or evidence. This can include:

  • a policy review calendar or schedule

  • a template showing how each policy is reviewed

  • meeting minutes or reports

  • online forms, databases

  • on-line surveys or records

  • flowcharts or diagram of the review process.

  • evidence of staff training or communication (for example emails, video blogs, online modules).

When assessing whether you comply with GMA304

Questions we are likely to ask

  • How is feedback from adults providing education and care or service users used to improve policies?

  • Are there mechanisms in place to monitor how policies are being followed?

  • What events or changes prompt an unscheduled review of policies?

  • Can you give an example of a policy that was updated due to a complaint, incident, or legislative change?

We are likely to look at, measure or count

How the parents and whānau of children attending the service and adults providing education and care are engaged in current reviews.

We are likely to request

Evidence of your system of on-going review including the outcome of reviews which have been completed.

An on-going operational review process is part of good governance and management practices. It helps keep policies relevant and makes sure your service is maintaining regulatory compliance.

Doing more than the minimum helps make things better for children and easier for staff. Below are some ideas you can consider.

When done well, review processes are clearly linked to your service’s goals, involve input from the right people, lead to meaningful improvements, and are understood and supported by everyone involved. Recording scheduled operational reviews in your annual plan is a good way to ensure they are prioritised and embedded in your service’s ongoing practice.

Operational review vs internal evaluation

It’s important to distinguish between operational review and internal evaluation. Operational review makes sure your service maintains regulatory compliance, while internal evaluation are quality assurance processes aimed at improving the quality of education and outcomes for children. You are not required to undertake internal evaluation to meet this criterion.

Strengthen quality by continuously improving

Ongoing reflection and internal evaluation help services strengthen the quality of education and care they provide. We have developed review approaches, frameworks and evaluation indicators that can support services to understand their practice, identify strengths, and focus on areas for improvement. These resources complement our external review process and support continuous quality improvement and positive outcomes for children and mokopuna.

 

Explore the resources available for your service and learn how they can support effective self-review and ongoing improvement Understanding reviews in ECE and kōhungahunga

Strategies and action plans

The strategies and action plan documents below may help your service consider culture, language, and identity in your reviews.

Ka Hikitia – Ka Hāpaitia

Tau Mai Te Reo

Action Plan for Pacific Education 2020–2030